feature request #7975
closedImplement a block to display name relations
Added by Andreas Kohlbecker over 5 years ago. Updated over 3 years ago.
100%
Description
Currently all name relations are displayed as if they where homonyms (non ... nec ...)
Bei Basionym und replaced synonym wird die Beziehung in den taxonomischen Datenbanken einfach nur so dargestellt:
Cichorium spinosum L., Sp. Pl.: 813. 1753 ≡ Acanthophyton spinosum (L.) Less., Syn. Gen. Compos.: 128. 1832
≡ ist gleichbedeutend mit "Basionym" oder "Replaced synonym"
Take the following tickets into account: #6678, #5857, #5856, #4177, #5697 (check master ticket for more?)
Oder of name relations by type:
- Basionym icon: ≡
- Replaced synonym icon: ≡
- Validation icon: –
- Homonyms [non ... nec ...]
- Orthographic variants (named corrections for phycobank) these are displayed in a special way, see #8196 and #6678
The name is always followesd by a footnote key for the footnote which contains the *${ruleConsidered} ${reference}:${referenceDetail}`
Examples:
- Phycobank:
- Navicula adminensis:
Files
picture156-1.png (60 KB) picture156-1.png | Andreas Kohlbecker, 03/20/2019 04:41 PM | ||
picture764-1.png (30 KB) picture764-1.png | Wolf-Henning Kusber, 05/24/2019 07:07 PM |
Related issues
Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 5 years ago
- Target version changed from Release 5.5 to Release 5.6
Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 5 years ago
- Related to task #7890: Display of name relations in the data portal [master ticket] added
Updated by Wolf-Henning Kusber over 5 years ago
Examples correctly in PhycoBank as use case for output improvement:
Example Validation
https://www.phycobank.org/cdm_dataportal/taxon/bccff19e-11e1-4bab-8d91-47032278bce6
Navicula adminensis D.Roberts & A.McMinn
Example: replacement name
https://www.phycobank.org/cdm_dataportal/registration/http%253A%252F%252Fphycobank.org%252F100154
Cosmarium sublundellii Kenins
Example: Orthographical correction
https://www.phycobank.org/cdm_dataportal/registration/http%253A%252F%252Fphycobank.org%252F100465
Mastogloia wulffiae Al-Handal & Pennesi
Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 5 years ago
- File picture156-1.png picture156-1.png added
Validation:
Replacement name:
Wie Validation behandeln,
Zudem wird
- beim Widget für Replaced Synonym die Eingabemöglichkeit für RuleConsidered angeboten.
- Der NameEditor um eine Checkbox für nom. illeg. erweitert. .... neues Ticket
Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 5 years ago
- Related to feature request #8196: display ortographic corrections in name relations as 'corrected name: <nameCache>' added
Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 5 years ago
- Target version changed from Release 5.6 to Release 5.7
Updated by Andreas Müller over 5 years ago
- Target version changed from Release 5.7 to Release 5.8
Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 5 years ago
- Subject changed from improve display of name relations to Implement a block to display name relations
This is rather a request for a new feature than an improvement for the existing implementation which creates an inline representation of name relations to be appended to the taxon name cache.
What is being requested here is a block displaying a list of relations. Therefore I am changing the subject of this ticket
Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 5 years ago
- Related to deleted (feature request #8196: display ortographic corrections in name relations as 'corrected name: <nameCache>')
Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 5 years ago
- Status changed from New to Resolved
- % Done changed from 0 to 50
Applied in changeset cdm-dataportal|ef686dd8e7c670f958e414ee6809803cc4807882.
Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 5 years ago
- Assignee changed from Andreas Kohlbecker to Wolf-Henning Kusber
fully implemented an ready for review
Updated by Wolf-Henning Kusber over 5 years ago
- File picture764-1.png picture764-1.png added
- Assignee changed from Wolf-Henning Kusber to Andreas Kohlbecker
the main issue is perfectly implemented, clear & correct wording
minor issue of the display: no separating character between Articles, reason and bibliographic citation of the relevant ICN
In this bibliographic reference we need the bibliographic authors, not the nomenclatural ones.
no separating character between Title and series (this seems to be a general issue).
Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 5 years ago
- Has duplicate bug #7884: Replacement name not shown in Portal added
Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 5 years ago
- Has duplicate bug #8231: Name relation non added
Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 5 years ago
- Assignee changed from Andreas Kohlbecker to Wolf-Henning Kusber
now the bibliographic authors are being used, please review again.
The missing separating character between Title and series is already in the database like this: "Turland, N.J., Wiersema, J.H., Barrie, F.R. & al., International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code) adopted by the Nineteenth International Botanical Congress Shenzhen, China, July 2017Regnum Vegetabile, 159" This is clearly an issue in the titlteCache, the reference has no in-reference.
Updated by Wolf-Henning Kusber about 5 years ago
- Status changed from Resolved to Feedback
Review: the bibliographic authors are used. This part is resolved, fine.
"Turland, N.J., Wiersema, J.H., Barrie, F.R. & al., ..."
the bibliographic author team is shortened by replathing the fourth til the nth author by "& al.".
This is only acceptable if there is a link to the complete reference in the system.
Updated by Wolf-Henning Kusber about 5 years ago
- Assignee changed from Wolf-Henning Kusber to Andreas Kohlbecker
Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 5 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Closed
I created a ticket (#8320) to discuss the linking of references.
Closing this issue as there is nothing else to do about it.
Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 5 years ago
- Related to feature request #8320: Links to reference page as appendend icon instead of having the whole citation as link added
Updated by Andreas Müller about 5 years ago
As discussed the reference of a nom. status or name relationship is meant to say who says that this status/relationship exists. It is not meant to cite the nomenclatoral code taken into account. Code information can be added freetext to the rule considered field.
Therefore I think we need to reopen this ticket.
Updated by Wolf-Henning Kusber about 5 years ago
"the reference of a nom. status or name relationship is meant to say who says that this status/relationship exists. It is not meant to cite the nomenclatoral code taken into account."
The Code cannot say that a concrete name is invalid or illegitimate. But the Code is the better reference in conjunction with the rule considered, than any other reference. I do not understand, why we should reopen the ticket.
Or do you mean "PhycoBank" is the reference and rule considered is "Turland et al. 2018, Art. 60"?? And if so, why we have just a freetext and do not have a reference for the referenced code there???
Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 5 years ago
- Status changed from Closed to Feedback
- Assignee changed from Andreas Kohlbecker to Andreas Müller
I think that adding a second reference to the NameRelationship
and to NomenclaturalStatus
would not hurt but would be helpful in a couple of ways:
- makes the meaning of the reference field clear
- consistency in referencing the code publications. Without this field consistency would need to be realized through the UI which is not the best way to deal with these things.
The ruleConsidered
field would be a citation detail to the nomenclaturalCodeReference
field
Updated by Wolf-Henning Kusber about 5 years ago
Thanks, Andreas K.
@ Andreas M.: please keep in mind that some rules and/or article numbers of the ICN may change. If we want to run Information Systems for ten years or longer, it is essential to know which (correct cited) Code is referred to.
Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 5 years ago
In the developer standup today we almost already decided for adding an enumeration field to NameRelationship
and to NomenclaturalStatus
to allow expressing the code exactly.
The enumeration type should offer string representations for the full citation, and appreciated citation, key of code (ICBN, ICZN, .....) for filtering and publication year, for ordering.
Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 5 years ago
- Copied to feature request #8398: Add nomenclatural code edition to ruleConsidered added
Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 5 years ago
- Related to bug #8399: show nomenclatural code edition for NameRelationship and NomenclaturalStatus added
Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 5 years ago
- Assignee changed from Andreas Müller to Wolf-Henning Kusber
Andreas Kohlbecker wrote:
In the developer standup today we almost already decided for adding an enumeration field to
NameRelationship
and toNomenclaturalStatus
to allow expressing the code exactly.The enumeration type should offer string representations for the full citation, and appreciated citation, key of code (ICBN, ICZN, .....) for filtering and publication year, for ordering.
There is now new tickets for this #8398 (model change) and #8399 (dataportal)
I think that we can close this issue, agreed?
Updated by Wolf-Henning Kusber over 3 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Worksforme
- Assignee changed from Wolf-Henning Kusber to Andreas Kohlbecker
can be closed
Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 3 years ago
- Status changed from Worksforme to Closed