Project

General

Profile

task #5857

task #4177: display of name relationships

show nomenclatural status for for representations of TaxonName

Added by Andreas Kohlbecker about 3 years ago. Updated 20 days ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Highest
Category:
cdm-dataportal
Target version:
Start date:
06/02/2016
Due date:
% Done:

80%

Severity:
normal

Description

the related name (name behind "non" does not yet show a status if a status exists). This is probably because it only shows the title cache, not the full title cache. The status is part of the full title cache. Maybe we also need discussion with users, if the status is wanted, before we spend time for implementation

TODO

  1. Discuss with users
  2. show citation, rule considered, and citation detail in footnotes

(split off from #5697)

picture502-1.png View (93 KB) Wolf-Henning Kusber, 05/31/2019 01:43 PM

picture292-1.png View (12.2 KB) Wolf-Henning Kusber, 05/31/2019 01:52 PM

picture890-1.png View (19.2 KB) Wolf-Henning Kusber, 05/31/2019 01:54 PM

picture437-1.png View (36.3 KB) Andreas Kohlbecker, 05/31/2019 10:31 PM

picture437-2.png View (25.1 KB) Andreas Kohlbecker, 05/31/2019 10:31 PM


Related issues

Related to Edit - task #7890: Display of name relations in the data portal [master ticket] New 11/07/2018
Related to Edit - feature request #8108: Name page shows complete name information New 05/26/2019
Related to Edit - feature request #8314: TaxonName provides the FullTitleCache as TaggedText Closed 05/28/2019
Related to Edit - feature request #8319: NomenclaturalStatus webservice implemented Closed 05/31/2019

Associated revisions

Revision a7560a18 (diff)
Added by Andreas Kohlbecker about 2 months ago

fix #5857 implementing display of nomenclatural status data in name page, registration page

Revision 16211a64 (diff)
Added by Andreas Kohlbecker about 2 months ago

ref #5857, ref #8319 adding TypedEntityRefernces to nom status TaggedText and fixing json serialization for EntitiyReferences in taxon.taggedTitle processing

Revision 222784c5 (diff)
Added by Andreas Kohlbecker about 2 months ago

ref #5857 showing show citation, rule considered, and citation of nomenclatural status in footnotes, adapting tests

History

#1 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker 8 months ago

  • Related to task #7890: Display of name relations in the data portal [master ticket] added

#2 Updated by Andreas Müller 8 months ago

  • Tags set to euro+med
  • Description updated (diff)

also relevant for E+M, need to check how this is handled in BM E+M

#3 Updated by Andreas Müller 2 months ago

  • Target version changed from Unassigned CDM tickets to Euro+Med Portal Release

#4 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 2 months ago

  • Private changed from Yes to No

#5 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 2 months ago

  • Assignee changed from Andreas Müller to Andreas Kohlbecker
  • Priority changed from New to Highest
  • Target version changed from Euro+Med Portal Release to Release 5.8

#6 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 2 months ago

  • Tags changed from euro+med to euro+med, phycobank

#7 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 2 months ago

#8 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 2 months ago

#9 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 2 months ago

  • Subject changed from show status for "non" names? to show nomenclatural status for for representations of TaxonName

#10 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 2 months ago

no need to discuss this with the users. The display of the nom status can be configured via the "Name render templates"

#11 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 2 months ago

  • Description updated (diff)

#12 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 2 months ago

#13 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 2 months ago

  • Status changed from New to Resolved
  • % Done changed from 0 to 50

#14 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 2 months ago

  • Assignee changed from Andreas Kohlbecker to Wolf-Henning Kusber

this has been solved completely, please review

#15 Updated by Wolf-Henning Kusber about 2 months ago

  • File picture502-1.png View added
  • Status changed from Resolved to Feedback
  • Assignee changed from Wolf-Henning Kusber to Andreas Kohlbecker
  • % Done changed from 50 to 80

Review: The articles are shown, but for users the content migth be confusing.

How to read this?
Navicula adminii D.Roberts & A.McMinn in Biblioth. Diatomol. 44: 27. 1999 is validated by [Art. 8.2, Art. 9.5 Turland, N.J., Wiersema, J.H., Barrie, F.R. & al., International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code) adopted by the Nineteenth International Botanical Congress Shenzhen, China, July 2017Regnum Vegetabile, 159] Navicula adminensis D.Roberts & A.McMinn ex D.Roberts & A.McMinn in Notulae Algarum 65: 1. 12.6.2018 ["12 Jun 2018"]

This would be kompletely wrong.

is validated by1 Navicula adminensis D.Roberts & A.McMinn ex D.Roberts & A.McMinn in Notulae Algarum 65: 1. 12.6.2018

better:
1 is validated by Navicula adminensis D.Roberts & A.McMinn ex D.Roberts & A.McMinn in Notulae Algarum 65: 1. 12.6.2018

or:
Navicula adminii1 is validated by Navicula adminensis D.Roberts & A.McMinn ex D.Roberts & A.McMinn in Notulae Algarum 65: 1. 12.6.2018

#16 Updated by Wolf-Henning Kusber about 2 months ago

The following output is perfect:

#17 Updated by Wolf-Henning Kusber about 2 months ago

The following output is fine:

#18 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 2 months ago

  • Assignee changed from Andreas Kohlbecker to Wolf-Henning Kusber

so can we close this issue or are you still testing?

#19 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 2 months ago

sorry I missed, comment 15, will respond again later

#20 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 2 months ago

  • Assignee changed from Wolf-Henning Kusber to Andreas Kohlbecker

#21 Updated by Wolf-Henning Kusber about 2 months ago

#15
is changed, but not in a proper way.
The articles are linked to the validating name. The articles refer to the reason why the invalid name is invalid (see above)

#22 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 2 months ago

I don't quite understand the problem.

Navicula adminensis is validating Navicula adminii and this validation is done according to the rule "Art. 8.2" as published in "Turland, at al 2017"

If you are looking at this relation from the side of Navicula adminensis it looks like this:

For Navicula adminii like this

In both cases the reason for the the necessity of validating the name Navicula adminii is made available via the footnote key which follows the label of the relationship. This label is named "is validating" or "is validation for" depending on the side from which you are looking.

The article is not only linked to the validating name it is also linked to the validated name and explains why it has been validated.

I can't see a problem here.

#23 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 1 month ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to In Progress
  • Assignee changed from Wolf-Henning Kusber to Andreas Kohlbecker

we (Andreas & Henning) decided to move the footnote in front of the relationship label depending on direction of the relation currently shown.

In case of N. adminii the footnote should be placed BEFORE the relationship label.

#24 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker 20 days ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
  • Assignee changed from Andreas Kohlbecker to Wolf-Henning Kusber

Andreas Kohlbecker wrote:

we (Andreas & Henning) decided to move the footnote in front of the relationship label depending on direction of the relation currently shown.

In case of N. adminii the footnote should be placed BEFORE the relationship label.

I discussed this suggestion again with Andreas Müller and came to the conclusion that the above suggestion would be confusing as it breaks the commonly accepted convention that foonotes are coming after the text they are referring to. The implementation of will therefore stay as is is.

I suggest to close this issue now.

Also available in: Atom PDF

Add picture from clipboard (Maximum size: 40 MB)