Project

General

Profile

Actions

feature request #7975

closed

Implement a block to display name relations

Added by Andreas Kohlbecker about 4 years ago. Updated about 2 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
New
Category:
cdm-dataportal
Target version:
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Estimated time:
(Total: 0:00 h)
Severity:
normal
Tags:

Description

Currently all name relations are displayed as if they where homonyms (non ... nec ...)

Bei Basionym und replaced synonym wird die Beziehung in den taxonomischen Datenbanken einfach nur so dargestellt:

Cichorium spinosum L., Sp. Pl.: 813. 1753
≡ Acanthophyton spinosum (L.) Less., Syn. Gen. Compos.: 128. 1832

≡ ist gleichbedeutend mit "Basionym" oder "Replaced synonym"


Take the following tickets into account: #6678, #5857, #5856, #4177, #5697 (check master ticket for more?)

Oder of name relations by type:

  1. Basionym icon: ≡
  2. Replaced synonym icon: ≡
  3. Validation icon: –
  4. Homonyms [non ... nec ...]
  5. Orthographic variants (named corrections for phycobank) these are displayed in a special way, see #8196 and #6678

The name is always followesd by a footnote key for the footnote which contains the *${ruleConsidered} ${reference}:${referenceDetail}`

Examples:


Files

picture156-1.png (60 KB) picture156-1.png Andreas Kohlbecker, 03/20/2019 04:41 PM
picture764-1.png (30 KB) picture764-1.png Wolf-Henning Kusber, 05/24/2019 07:07 PM

Subtasks 1 (0 open1 closed)

feature request #8196: display ortographic corrections in name relations as 'corrected name: <nameCache>'ClosedAndreas Kohlbecker

Actions

Related issues

Related to EDIT - task #7890: Display of name relations in the data portal [master ticket]NewAndreas Kohlbecker

Actions
Related to EDIT - feature request #8320: Links to reference page as appendend icon instead of having the whole citation as link ClosedAndreas Kohlbecker

Actions
Related to EDIT - bug #8399: show nomenclatural code edition for NameRelationship and NomenclaturalStatusNewAndreas Kohlbecker

Actions
Has duplicate EDIT - bug #7884: Replacement name not shown in PortalDuplicateAndreas Kohlbecker

Actions
Has duplicate EDIT - bug #8231: Name relation nonWorksformeWolf-Henning Kusber

Actions
Copied to EDIT - feature request #8398: Add nomenclatural code edition to ruleConsideredClosedAndreas Müller

Actions
Actions #1

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 4 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)
Actions #2

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 4 years ago

  • Target version changed from Release 5.5 to Release 5.6
Actions #3

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker almost 4 years ago

  • Related to task #7890: Display of name relations in the data portal [master ticket] added
Actions #4

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker almost 4 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)
Actions #5

Updated by Wolf-Henning Kusber almost 4 years ago

Examples correctly in PhycoBank as use case for output improvement:

Example Validation
https://www.phycobank.org/cdm_dataportal/taxon/bccff19e-11e1-4bab-8d91-47032278bce6
Navicula adminensis D.Roberts & A.McMinn

Example: replacement name
https://www.phycobank.org/cdm_dataportal/registration/http%253A%252F%252Fphycobank.org%252F100154
Cosmarium sublundellii Kenins

Example: Orthographical correction
https://www.phycobank.org/cdm_dataportal/registration/http%253A%252F%252Fphycobank.org%252F100465
Mastogloia wulffiae Al-Handal & Pennesi

Actions #6

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker almost 4 years ago

Validation:

Replacement name:

Wie Validation behandeln,

Zudem wird

  1. beim Widget für Replaced Synonym die Eingabemöglichkeit für RuleConsidered angeboten.
  2. Der NameEditor um eine Checkbox für nom. illeg. erweitert. .... neues Ticket
Actions #7

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker almost 4 years ago

  • Related to feature request #8196: display ortographic corrections in name relations as 'corrected name: <nameCache>' added
Actions #8

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker almost 4 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)
Actions #9

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker almost 4 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)
Actions #10

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker almost 4 years ago

  • Target version changed from Release 5.6 to Release 5.7
Actions #11

Updated by Andreas Müller almost 4 years ago

  • Target version changed from Release 5.7 to Release 5.8
Actions #12

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 3 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)
Actions #13

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 3 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)
Actions #14

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 3 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)
Actions #15

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 3 years ago

  • Subject changed from improve display of name relations to Implement a block to display name relations

This is rather a request for a new feature than an improvement for the existing implementation which creates an inline representation of name relations to be appended to the taxon name cache.
What is being requested here is a block displaying a list of relations. Therefore I am changing the subject of this ticket

Actions #16

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 3 years ago

  • Related to deleted (feature request #8196: display ortographic corrections in name relations as 'corrected name: <nameCache>')
Actions #17

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 3 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Resolved
  • % Done changed from 0 to 50
Actions #18

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 3 years ago

  • Assignee changed from Andreas Kohlbecker to Wolf-Henning Kusber

fully implemented an ready for review

Actions #19

Updated by Wolf-Henning Kusber over 3 years ago

  1. the main issue is perfectly implemented, clear & correct wording

  2. minor issue of the display: no separating character between Articles, reason and bibliographic citation of the relevant ICN

  3. In this bibliographic reference we need the bibliographic authors, not the nomenclatural ones.

  4. no separating character between Title and series (this seems to be a general issue).

Actions #20

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 3 years ago

  • Has duplicate bug #7884: Replacement name not shown in Portal added
Actions #21

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 3 years ago

  • Has duplicate bug #8231: Name relation non added
Actions #22

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 3 years ago

  • Assignee changed from Andreas Kohlbecker to Wolf-Henning Kusber

now the bibliographic authors are being used, please review again.

The missing separating character between Title and series is already in the database like this: "Turland, N.J., Wiersema, J.H., Barrie, F.R. & al., International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code) adopted by the Nineteenth International Botanical Congress Shenzhen, China, July 2017Regnum Vegetabile, 159" This is clearly an issue in the titlteCache, the reference has no in-reference.

Actions #23

Updated by Wolf-Henning Kusber over 3 years ago

  • Status changed from Resolved to Feedback

Review: the bibliographic authors are used. This part is resolved, fine.

"Turland, N.J., Wiersema, J.H., Barrie, F.R. & al., ..."
the bibliographic author team is shortened by replathing the fourth til the nth author by "& al.".
This is only acceptable if there is a link to the complete reference in the system.

Actions #24

Updated by Wolf-Henning Kusber over 3 years ago

  • Assignee changed from Wolf-Henning Kusber to Andreas Kohlbecker
Actions #25

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 3 years ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to Closed

I created a ticket (#8320) to discuss the linking of references.

Closing this issue as there is nothing else to do about it.

Actions #26

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 3 years ago

  • Related to feature request #8320: Links to reference page as appendend icon instead of having the whole citation as link added
Actions #27

Updated by Andreas Müller over 3 years ago

As discussed the reference of a nom. status or name relationship is meant to say who says that this status/relationship exists. It is not meant to cite the nomenclatoral code taken into account. Code information can be added freetext to the rule considered field.
Therefore I think we need to reopen this ticket.

Actions #28

Updated by Wolf-Henning Kusber over 3 years ago

"the reference of a nom. status or name relationship is meant to say who says that this status/relationship exists. It is not meant to cite the nomenclatoral code taken into account."

The Code cannot say that a concrete name is invalid or illegitimate. But the Code is the better reference in conjunction with the rule considered, than any other reference. I do not understand, why we should reopen the ticket.

Or do you mean "PhycoBank" is the reference and rule considered is "Turland et al. 2018, Art. 60"?? And if so, why we have just a freetext and do not have a reference for the referenced code there???

Actions #29

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 3 years ago

  • Status changed from Closed to Feedback
  • Assignee changed from Andreas Kohlbecker to Andreas Müller

I think that adding a second reference to the NameRelationship and to NomenclaturalStatus would not hurt but would be helpful in a couple of ways:

  • makes the meaning of the reference field clear
  • consistency in referencing the code publications. Without this field consistency would need to be realized through the UI which is not the best way to deal with these things.

The ruleConsidered field would be a citation detail to the nomenclaturalCodeReference field

Actions #30

Updated by Wolf-Henning Kusber over 3 years ago

Thanks, Andreas K.
@ Andreas M.: please keep in mind that some rules and/or article numbers of the ICN may change. If we want to run Information Systems for ten years or longer, it is essential to know which (correct cited) Code is referred to.

Actions #31

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 3 years ago

In the developer standup today we almost already decided for adding an enumeration field to NameRelationship and to NomenclaturalStatus to allow expressing the code exactly.

The enumeration type should offer string representations for the full citation, and appreciated citation, key of code (ICBN, ICZN, .....) for filtering and publication year, for ordering.

Actions #32

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 3 years ago

Actions #33

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 3 years ago

  • Related to bug #8399: show nomenclatural code edition for NameRelationship and NomenclaturalStatus added
Actions #34

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 3 years ago

  • Assignee changed from Andreas Müller to Wolf-Henning Kusber

Andreas Kohlbecker wrote:

In the developer standup today we almost already decided for adding an enumeration field to NameRelationship and to NomenclaturalStatus to allow expressing the code exactly.

The enumeration type should offer string representations for the full citation, and appreciated citation, key of code (ICBN, ICZN, .....) for filtering and publication year, for ordering.

There is now new tickets for this #8398 (model change) and #8399 (dataportal)

I think that we can close this issue, agreed?

Actions #35

Updated by Wolf-Henning Kusber about 2 years ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to Worksforme
  • Assignee changed from Wolf-Henning Kusber to Andreas Kohlbecker

can be closed

Actions #36

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 2 years ago

  • Status changed from Worksforme to Closed
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF