EDIT

moving unresolved tickets to next milestone after release of 3.8.0

Andreas Kohlbecker wrote:

itextpdf/5.0.6 has the AGPL3 license which is a free license https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.itextpdf/itextpdf/5.0.6

Also version version 5.5.8 that we currently use has AGPL3 https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.itextpdf/itextpdf/5.5.8

As we had no problems with missing codehouse for years now I think we can close this ticket without further checking. I remove milestone as it does not really belong to any milestone

There are still the repository definition in cdmlib/pom.xml:

./pom.xml-227-      <name>JBoss Repository</name>
./pom.xml-228-      <url>http://repository.jboss.com</url>
./pom.xml-229-    </repository>
./pom.xml:230:    <!-- codehaus mule repository needed for yourkit -->
./pom.xml-231- <!--   <repository>
./pom.xml-232-      <id>CodehausMuleRepository</id>
./pom.xml:233:      <url>http://dist.codehaus.org/mule/dependencies/maven2/</url>
./pom.xml-234-    </repository>    -->
./pom.xml-235-    <!-- current spring source repositories -->
./pom.xml-236- <!--   <repository>

As this code is commented since 2015 I did not consider it as a real repository definition. It does not contradict "As we had no problems with missing codehouse for years now I think we can close this ticket without further checking".

However, as this special repository seems to be used only for yourkit which we use very seldom I did not want to completely remove this information that yourkit was at sometime available in CodehausMuleRepository (is this the same as the standard codehaus.org repo?).

As you are using yourkit most of us please decide if this is still needed or not or if any other change is required. Otherwise I would suggest to close the ticket again because except for yourkit maybe there definetly does not seem to be any dependency to codehaus.org anymore which is the topic of this ticket.