feature request #8014: Label wording im UI Name Editor - Edit - Redmine

feature request #8014

Label wording im UI Name Editor

Added by Wolf-Henning Kusber over 1 year ago. Updated 10 months ago.

Status:

Closed

Priority:

Highest

Assignee:

Andreas Kohlbecker

Category:

cdm-vaadin

Target version:

Release 5.10

Start date:

01/23/2019

Due date:

% Done:

100%

Severity:

normal

Tags:

phycobank

Description

Minor correctiones

is also related to #7899

picture001-1.png View (28.7 KB) Wolf-Henning Kusber, 01/23/2019 06:21 PM

picture001-2.png View (43.7 KB) Wolf-Henning Kusber, 01/23/2019 06:21 PM

picture387-1.png View (29.9 KB) Andreas Kohlbecker, 09/10/2019 11:16 AM

Associated revisions

Revision 218b286e (diff)
Added by Andreas Kohlbecker 10 months ago

fix #8014 improving lables related to validation and replaced basionyms, fixing labeling issue in NameRelationField and harmonizing add/remove button

History

#1 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 1 year ago

Parent task set to #7866

#2 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 1 year ago

Target version changed from Unassigned CDM tickets to Release 5.6
Parent task deleted (~~#7866~~)

#3 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 1 year ago

Target version changed from Release 5.6 to Release 5.7

#4 Updated by Andreas Müller about 1 year ago

Target version changed from Release 5.7 to Release 5.8

#5 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 1 year ago

Priority changed from New to Highest

#6 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker 12 months ago

Target version changed from Release 5.8 to Release 5.10

#7 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker 10 months ago

Status changed from New to Resolved
% Done changed from 0 to 50

Applied in changeset cdm-vaadin|218b286e1ebf5a962c239f2bd726df714652257e.

#8 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker 10 months ago

Assignee changed from Andreas Kohlbecker to Wolf-Henning Kusber

done, please review.

#9 Updated by Wolf-Henning Kusber 10 months ago

Assignee changed from Wolf-Henning Kusber to Andreas Kohlbecker
% Done changed from 50 to 100

"Replaced synonym" as decided, fine.
"Validation of": the idea was "Validation of designation" this would be the correct wording with respect to ICN, but the version "Validation of" is may be more user oriented. Validation of [Field to type in reference and designation]

This ticket can be closed