feature request #7715
closedDescription sources should be handled same as DescriptionElement
50%
Description
Description sources are currently in supplemental data, DescriptionElement in Details view.
Both should be in Details view.
Related issues
Updated by Andreas Müller over 5 years ago
- Related to feature request #1847: Apply description sources (references) for a DescriptionBase to all included description elements added
Updated by Andreas Müller over 5 years ago
- Related to bug #7716: Apply description sources (references) for a DescriptionBase to all included description elements added
Updated by Patrick Plitzner over 5 years ago
- Status changed from New to Resolved
- % Done changed from 0 to 50
Applied in changeset taxeditor|472f773b8ac025f074ab28f5ef674533cda95717.
Updated by Patrick Plitzner over 5 years ago
- Assignee changed from Patrick Plitzner to Andreas Müller
Updated by Andreas Müller over 5 years ago
- Status changed from Resolved to Feedback
- Assignee changed from Andreas Müller to Katja Luther
- % Done changed from 50 to 70
Generally it works, but there comes a selection dialog for choosing the source type. This needs to be removed as for now PrimaryTaxonomicSource should be the default type. Within additivity we may discuss if under certain circumstances this should not be the case.
Katja, could you do this as PP is on holidays?
Updated by Andreas Müller over 5 years ago
Generally we need to discuss if moving the sources from Supplemental Data to Details View means removing them at first place or cloning them. But this may be discussed together with general discussion on handling supplemental data in details view.
Updated by Andreas Müller over 5 years ago
The section is called "Description Sources" we should either relabel them "References" as in DescriptionElementDetailsView or relabel them "Sources" as in SupplementalDataView. If doing the later we should also relabel them in DescriptionElementDetailsView accordingly.
I prefer the later as it is more correct and more consistent throughout the application and according to the data model. Also "source" is less ambigous then "reference".
We should definitely remove "Description" from label as this becomes clear from the DetailsView label already and is ambigous because the term Description is ambigous.
Updated by Katja Luther over 5 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Resolved
- % Done changed from 70 to 50
Applied in changeset taxeditor|d2c62a2b15901df2b03ad04d2f384f523d781492.
Updated by Andreas Müller over 5 years ago
- Assignee changed from Katja Luther to Patrick Plitzner
Updated by Andreas Müller over 5 years ago
- Assignee changed from Patrick Plitzner to Andreas Müller
Updated by Andreas Müller over 5 years ago
- Status changed from Resolved to Feedback
- Assignee changed from Andreas Müller to Katja Luther
Andreas Müller wrote:
The section is called "Description Sources" we should either relabel them "References" as in DescriptionElementDetailsView or relabel them "Sources" as in SupplementalDataView. If doing the later we should also relabel them in DescriptionElementDetailsView accordingly.
I prefer the later as it is more correct and more consistent throughout the application and according to the data model. Also "source" is less ambigous then "reference".
Is there a reason for using "Reference" now, not "Source" as suggested. If yes can you please leave a note why you think this is preferable?
Updated by Andreas Müller over 5 years ago
Generally this ticket is ready and can be closed.
Updated by Katja Luther over 5 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Resolved
- % Done changed from 90 to 50
Applied in changeset taxeditor|b717449e43d02a06fe22849e383f8a6e922682aa.
Updated by Katja Luther over 5 years ago
- Assignee changed from Katja Luther to Andreas Müller
changed the label of descriptions and descriptionelements sources to sources
Updated by Andreas Müller over 5 years ago
- Status changed from Resolved to Closed
- Assignee changed from Andreas Müller to Patrick Plitzner