feature request #7715: Description sources should be handled same as DescriptionElement - EDIT - EDIT Project Management

Custom queries

5.33
cdm-dataportal (open)
last 7 days tickets
mine in current release
phycobank
phycobank-index-closed
phycobank-registration-closed
potentially missed issues
recently updated
Release3.7
Release3.8
Release4.0
Release4.1
Release4.10
Release4.11
Release4.12
Release4.13
Release4.14
Release4.16
Release4.2
Release4.3
Release4.4
Release4.5
Release4.6
Release4.7
Release4.8
Release4.9
Release4.9
Release5.0
Release5.1
Release5.10
Release5.11
Release5.12
Release5.13
Release5.14
Release5.15
Release5.16
Release5.17
Release5.18
Release5.19
Release5.2
Release5.20
Release5.21
Release5.22
Release5.23
Release5.24
Release5.25
Release5.26
Release5.27
Release5.28
Release5.29
Release5.3
Release5.30
Release5.31
Release5.32
Release5.33
Release5.34
Release5.35
Release5.36
Release5.37
Release5.38
Release5.39
Release5.4
Release5.40
Release5.41
Release5.5
Release5.6
Release5.7
Release5.8
Release5.9
Remoting-Versions
Taxeditor-UX (Platform Etablierung)

Actions

Copy link

feature request #7715

closed

Description sources should be handled same as DescriptionElement

Added by Andreas Müller over 5 years ago. Updated over 5 years ago.

Status:

Closed

Priority:

Highest

Assignee:

Patrick Plitzner

Category:

taxeditor

Target version:

Release 5.3

Start date:

Due date:

% Done:

50%

Estimated time:

Severity:

normal

Tags:

additivity

Description

Description sources are currently in supplemental data, DescriptionElement in Details view.

Both should be in Details view.

Related issues

Related to EDIT - feature request #1847: Apply description sources (references) for a DescriptionBase to all included description elements

Rejected

Andreas Müller

Actions

Related to EDIT - bug #7716: Apply description sources (references) for a DescriptionBase to all included description elements

In Progress

Andreas Müller

Actions

Issue # Delay: days Cancel

History
Notes
Property changes
Associated revisions

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Andreas Müller over 5 years ago

Related to feature request #1847: Apply description sources (references) for a DescriptionBase to all included description elements added

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Andreas Müller over 5 years ago

Related to bug #7716: Apply description sources (references) for a DescriptionBase to all included description elements added

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Patrick Plitzner over 5 years ago

Status changed from New to Resolved
% Done changed from 0 to 50

Applied in changeset taxeditor|472f773b8ac025f074ab28f5ef674533cda95717.

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Patrick Plitzner over 5 years ago

Assignee changed from Patrick Plitzner to Andreas Müller

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Andreas Müller over 5 years ago

Status changed from Resolved to Feedback
Assignee changed from Andreas Müller to Katja Luther
% Done changed from 50 to 70

Generally it works, but there comes a selection dialog for choosing the source type. This needs to be removed as for now PrimaryTaxonomicSource should be the default type. Within additivity we may discuss if under certain circumstances this should not be the case.

Katja, could you do this as PP is on holidays?

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Andreas Müller over 5 years ago

Generally we need to discuss if moving the sources from Supplemental Data to Details View means removing them at first place or cloning them. But this may be discussed together with general discussion on handling supplemental data in details view.

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Andreas Müller over 5 years ago

The section is called "Description Sources" we should either relabel them "References" as in DescriptionElementDetailsView or relabel them "Sources" as in SupplementalDataView. If doing the later we should also relabel them in DescriptionElementDetailsView accordingly.

I prefer the later as it is more correct and more consistent throughout the application and according to the data model. Also "source" is less ambigous then "reference".

We should definitely remove "Description" from label as this becomes clear from the DetailsView label already and is ambigous because the term Description is ambigous.

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Katja Luther over 5 years ago

Status changed from Feedback to Resolved
% Done changed from 70 to 50

Applied in changeset taxeditor|d2c62a2b15901df2b03ad04d2f384f523d781492.

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Andreas Müller over 5 years ago

Assignee changed from Katja Luther to Patrick Plitzner

Actions

Copy link

#10

Updated by Andreas Müller over 5 years ago

Assignee changed from Patrick Plitzner to Andreas Müller

Actions

Copy link

#11

Updated by Andreas Müller over 5 years ago

Status changed from Resolved to Feedback
Assignee changed from Andreas Müller to Katja Luther

Andreas Müller wrote:

The section is called "Description Sources" we should either relabel them "References" as in DescriptionElementDetailsView or relabel them "Sources" as in SupplementalDataView. If doing the later we should also relabel them in DescriptionElementDetailsView accordingly.

I prefer the later as it is more correct and more consistent throughout the application and according to the data model. Also "source" is less ambigous then "reference".

Is there a reason for using "Reference" now, not "Source" as suggested. If yes can you please leave a note why you think this is preferable?

Actions

Copy link

#12