bug #7963
TaxonNamePopEditor: name part field visibility not correct for all ranks
0%
Description
[henning]
I checked the complete list. With some ranks (mostly not relevant for PhycoBank, I have problems).
"species aggegate" should also have an additional uninominal (to link it to a given genus).
"species group" should also have an additional uninominal (to link it to a given genus).
"candidate" is not relevant to PhycoBank, but I would expect that 99-100% of candidates in bacteriology will be a species -> delete "infraspecific epithet" there.
"unknown rank": I would suggest to offer just a "uninominal" because if there are genus and one epithet it should be a species, if it is unknown infraspecific, we have an own entry.
Related issues
History
#1 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 1 month ago
- Copied from bug #7944: TaxonNamePopEditor: name part fields are required added
#2 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 1 month ago
- Status changed from Resolved to Feedback
- Assignee changed from Andreas Kohlbecker to Wolf-Henning Kusber
is there a rank which is highly relevant for phycobank for which this issue needs to be fixed immediately?
#3 Updated by Wolf-Henning Kusber about 1 month ago
"unknown rank" as uninominal might be important. The others are not in use and not expected to use.
#4 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 1 month ago
Why is it "unknown rank" and not "unranked". The other vague rank terms are labled "unranked infraspecific" and "unranked infrageneric"?
#5 Updated by Wolf-Henning Kusber about 1 month ago
"unranked" is fine as long it points to an uninominal.
