Project

General

Profile

Actions

feature request #9755

open

Open issues for cultivar handling

Added by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago. Updated over 1 year ago.

Status:
In Progress
Priority:
Priority14
Category:
cdmlib
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

30%

Estimated time:
Severity:
normal

Description

Cultivar names, groups and grex are currently not parsable (#9757)

Cultivar names, groups and grex need to be formatted correctly (#9754)

Decide on related ranks (see also #6387)

Add "Group" or "Gp" and "grex" or "gx" as abbreviation to the according rank terms (similar to #5981 - but not fully correct there)

Handling of cultivars in TaxEditor needs improvement (see #9762)

  • Show cultivar ranks only when ICNCP is selected, do not show any other ranks then #9762
  • Make it possible to select only from certain Codes in NomCode field (e.g. only ICN and ICNCP), alternatively remove ICNCP from Codes as selecting one of the cultivar ranks (#6387) may be enough to decide that ICNCP is meant (ask taxonomists for correctness of this idea)

Handle cultivars correctly in publication

  • cultivar part should not be put in italics (see also formatting)

Questions:

  • is grex only used for cultivars? What about existing grex names in current databases
  • what exactly is rank "denomination class" (see Art. 6), usually it is a genus, should it be moved there?
  • Should graft-chimera be handled similar to hybrids (or general: how to handle them)
  • what is rank convar (see #6387)
  • Should a cultivar name link to the scientific name it is derived from? (see IOPI model https://archive.bgbm.org/biodivinf/docs/iopi_model/iopi_model.pdf page 295)
  • How to handle cultivars using infraspecific scientific name part (the rank can not be defined here as the rank is used for setting the cultivar rank), should rank marker be entered into the infaspecific epi field as this is a rare case, maybe change label in TaxEditor in this case?

What about grex names like "Amblysellus grex" (https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/4880)? Is this a simple species or a cultivated plant name? Similar: Parthenicus grex Van Duzee, 1925

Code: http://www.actahort.org/chronica/pdf/sh_10.pdf

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internationaler_Code_der_Nomenklatur_der_Kulturpflanzen

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grex_(horticulture)


Related issues

Related to EDIT - feature request #9754: Adapt cache strategy to support cultivar namesClosedAndreas Müller

Actions
Related to EDIT - feature request #6387: [Rule] Rank rule for CultivarPlantNamesClosedAndreas Müller

Actions
Related to EDIT - feature request #5981: Add abbreviation to Rank "Cultivar"ClosedAndreas Müller

Actions
Related to EDIT - feature request #9757: Make cultivars, cultivar groups and grexes parsableClosedAndreas Müller

Actions
Related to EDIT - feature request #6963: Implement cache strategy for cultivar plant names (done), bacterial names, fungi, etc.In ProgressAndreas Müller

Actions
Related to EDIT - feature request #9761: Add cultivarGroup as field for handling cultivar groups and grexClosedAndreas Müller

Actions
Related to EDIT - bug #9762: Handle cultivars correctly in TaxEditorClosedKatja Luther

Actions
Actions #1

Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago

  • Description updated (diff)
  • Category set to cdmlib
  • Assignee set to Andreas Müller
  • Target version changed from Unassigned CDM tickets to Release 5.37
Actions #2

Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago

  • Description updated (diff)
Actions #3

Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago

  • Description updated (diff)
Actions #4

Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago

Actions #5

Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago

Actions #6

Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago

Actions #7

Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago

  • Tags set to cultivar, mexico
Actions #8

Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago

  • Description updated (diff)
Actions #9

Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago

  • Description updated (diff)
Actions #10

Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago

  • Description updated (diff)
Actions #11

Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago

Actions #12

Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago

  • Related to feature request #6963: Implement cache strategy for cultivar plant names (done), bacterial names, fungi, etc. added
Actions #13

Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago

  • Status changed from New to In Progress

Existing cases:

SELECT *
FROM TaxonName tn INNER JOIN DefinedTermBase r ON r.id = tn.rank_id
WHERE r.uuid = '08dcb4ff-ac58-48a3-93af-efb3d836ac84';

SELECT *
FROM TaxonName tn 
WHERE tn.titleCache LIKE '% grex%' OR tn.fullTitleCache LIKE '% grex%' OR tn.nameCache LIKE '% grex%' 

Most of them are in Hieracium

Currently records exist in Cichorieae, E+M, RL Plantae, RL Standardliste, FdAC, FM

Actions #14

Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago

  • Description updated (diff)
Actions #15

Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago

  • Description updated (diff)
Actions #16

Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago

  • Description updated (diff)
Actions #17

Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago

  • Related to feature request #9761: Add cultivarGroup as field for handling cultivar groups and grex added
Actions #18

Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago

  • Description updated (diff)
Actions #19

Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago

  • Related to bug #9762: Handle cultivars correctly in TaxEditor added
Actions #20

Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago

  • Description updated (diff)
Actions #21

Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Resolved

Not yet fully resolved but set to resolved to not forget

Actions #22

Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago

  • Priority changed from New to Highest
Actions #23

Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago

  • Target version changed from Release 5.37 to Release 5.27
Actions #24

Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago

  • Description updated (diff)
  • Priority changed from Highest to New
  • Target version changed from Release 5.27 to Release 5.37
Actions #25

Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago

  • Priority changed from New to Highest
  • Target version changed from Release 5.37 to Release 5.27
Actions #26

Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago

  • Description updated (diff)
Actions #27

Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago

  • Description updated (diff)
Actions #28

Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago

  • Description updated (diff)
  • % Done changed from 0 to 20
Actions #29

Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago

  • Tracker changed from bug to feature request
Actions #30

Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago

  • Description updated (diff)
Actions #31

Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago

  • Description updated (diff)
Actions #32

Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago

  • Subject changed from Fix and improve cultivar handling to Open issues for cultivar handling
  • Status changed from Resolved to In Progress
  • Priority changed from Highest to Priority14
  • Target version changed from Release 5.27 to Reviewed Next Major Release
  • % Done changed from 20 to 30

The important issues have been fixed with 5.27 mostly using separate tickets.

Actions #33

Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago

AM:

Verwendung von nom. Author and nom. Ref. (und evtl. andere Zusätze):
Article 28.2 verstehe ich so, dass ein Autor angegeben werden kann nach dem Namen (aber weniger zwingend als bei Wildpflanzen), es aber keine Basionym oder Ex-Autoren gibt. Korrekt?
Wie sieht es mit der Angabe von nomenklatorischen Referenzen aus. Erfolgt das genauso wie bei Wildplanzen oder werden nom.Refs. anders oder gar nicht angegeben? (Ich habe keine Beispiele mit nom. ref. gefunden, lediglich die Recommendation 27B.1., die aber allgemeinerer Natur ist)

WGB:

Ich denke, es gelten die gleichen Regeln bei einer Autorenangabe wie im Bot. Code.
Das Literaturzitat wird (vermutlich) eher nicht verwandt.

Actions #34

Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago

AM

Denomination class:
Verstehe ich es richtig, dass das in der Regel Taxa vom Rang „Genus“ sind, und in seltenen Fällen auch andere Ränge? Wie unterscheidet sich die denomination class von der „normalen“ Gattung? Gibt es denomination classes, die nicht Taxa sind, die dem ICNafp folgen? Wenn ja, gibt es Beispiele.
Auch hier müssen wir den Rang nicht unbedingt unterstützen, ich würde ihn aber zumindest gerne kommentieren. Ich nehme an, beim Parsen lässt er sich sowieso nicht von einer Gattung unterscheiden.

WGB:

Muss ich mir ansehen, aber man sollte jemanden aus der Cultivated Plant Community solche Sachen fragen.

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF