* The taxon relationship will also be added to the set of taxon
* relationships to the other (misapplied name) taxon involved in the created relationship.
*
- * @param misappliedNameTaxon the taxon which plays the target role in the new taxon relationship
+ * @param misappliedNameTaxon the taxon which plays the source role in the new taxon relationship
* @param citation the reference source for the new taxon relationship
* @param microcitation the string with the details describing the exact localisation within the reference
* @return
* "pro parte misapplied name for") instance where <i>this</i> taxon plays the target role
* and adds it to the set of {@link #getRelationsToThisTaxon() taxon relationships to <i>this</i> taxon}.
* The taxon relationship will also be added to the set of taxon
- * relationships to the other (misapplied name) taxon involved in the created relationship.
+ * relationships to the other (pro parte misapplied name) taxon involved in the created relationship.
*
- * @param misappliedNameTaxon the taxon which plays the target role in the new taxon relationship
+ * @param proPartemisappliedNameTaxon the taxon which plays the source role in the new taxon relationship
* @param citation the reference source for the new taxon relationship
* @param microcitation the string with the details describing the exact localisation within the reference
* @return
* in such a {@link TaxonRelationship taxon relationship} has been erroneously used by
* the {@link TaxonBase#getSec() concept reference} to (partly) denominate the same real taxon
* as the one meant by the target {@link Taxon taxon}. Additionaly another real taxon
- * is (partly) demoninated by the given name in the concept reference. Therefore it is called
+ * is (partly) denominated by the given name in the concept reference. Therefore it is called
* pro parte. <BR>
* This type is neither symmetric nor transitive.
*