ZoologicalAdaptation » History » Version 1
Anonymous, 07/24/2007 03:41 PM
| 1 | 1 | The Berlin Model was developed for botanical data initially. Zoological and botanical data are surprisingly similar though and even the lates nomenclatural codes ( [ICZN](http://www.iczn.org/iczn/index.jsp,[ICBN":http://www.bgbm.org/iapt/nomenclature/code/SaintLouis/0001ICSLContents.htm) do not diverge too much. The "BioCODE](http://www.bgbm.org/IAPT/biocode/biocode.html)) give a good overview of all coes too. |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | |||
| 3 | |||
| 4 | The zoological adaptation has partly been done, but zoological requirements are still not known completely. |
||
| 5 | |||
| 6 | |||
| 7 | |||
| 8 | ##### Zoological requirements |
||
| 9 | |||
| 10 | * change the formatting routine for names so that: |
||
| 11 | |||
| 12 | * authors are not abbreviated |
||
| 13 | |||
| 14 | * the authorstring contains the year of publication (preferably provided by the nomencl.reference) |
||
| 15 | |||
| 16 | * NOT DONE: display subgenus in paranethesis between genus and species epitheton |
||
| 17 | |||
| 18 | * changes to webeditor forms |
||
| 19 | |||
| 20 | * hybrid name forms hidden rarely needed in zoology |
||
| 21 | |||
| 22 | * ex-(basionym)authors are not needed |
||
| 23 | |||
| 24 | * use different or additional terminology for: |
||
| 25 | |||
| 26 | * [[NameRelations]] |
||
| 27 | |||
| 28 | * [[TaxonRelations]] |
||
| 29 | |||
| 30 | * [[NomenclaturalStatus]] (Remark: In the Diptera database (and OSF?) nomenclatural status and name relations are combined. In the Diptera database "synonym" is a status,"nomen nudum" another. The relationship between names is only expressed by citing the original name as well as the valid name) |