|
1
|
/**
|
|
2
|
* Copyright (C) 2007 EDIT
|
|
3
|
* European Distributed Institute of Taxonomy
|
|
4
|
* http://www.e-taxonomy.eu
|
|
5
|
*
|
|
6
|
* The contents of this file are subject to the Mozilla Public License Version 1.1
|
|
7
|
* See LICENSE.TXT at the top of this package for the full license terms.
|
|
8
|
*/
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
package eu.etaxonomy.cdm.model.taxon;
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
import java.util.HashMap;
|
|
13
|
import java.util.HashSet;
|
|
14
|
import java.util.List;
|
|
15
|
import java.util.Map;
|
|
16
|
import java.util.Set;
|
|
17
|
import java.util.UUID;
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
import javax.persistence.Entity;
|
|
20
|
import javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlAccessType;
|
|
21
|
import javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlAccessorType;
|
|
22
|
import javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlRootElement;
|
|
23
|
import javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlType;
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
import org.apache.log4j.Logger;
|
|
26
|
import org.hibernate.envers.Audited;
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
import eu.etaxonomy.cdm.model.common.DefinedTermBase;
|
|
29
|
import eu.etaxonomy.cdm.model.common.RelationshipTermBase;
|
|
30
|
import eu.etaxonomy.cdm.model.common.TermType;
|
|
31
|
import eu.etaxonomy.cdm.model.common.TermVocabulary;
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
/**
|
|
35
|
* The class representing categories of {@link TaxonRelationship taxon relationships}
|
|
36
|
* (like "is congruent to" or "is misapplied name for").
|
|
37
|
* <P>
|
|
38
|
* A standard (ordered) list of taxon relationship type instances will be
|
|
39
|
* automatically created as the project starts. But this class allows to extend
|
|
40
|
* this standard list by creating new instances of additional taxon
|
|
41
|
* relationship types if needed.
|
|
42
|
* <P>
|
|
43
|
* This class corresponds in part to: <ul>
|
|
44
|
* <li> TaxonRelationshipTerm according to the TDWG ontology
|
|
45
|
* <li> RelationshipType according to the TCS
|
|
46
|
* </ul>
|
|
47
|
*
|
|
48
|
* @author m.doering
|
|
49
|
* @since 08-Nov-2007 13:06:17
|
|
50
|
*/
|
|
51
|
@XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD)
|
|
52
|
@XmlType(name = "TaxonRelationshipType")
|
|
53
|
@XmlRootElement(name = "TaxonRelationshipType")
|
|
54
|
@Entity
|
|
55
|
//@Indexed disabled to reduce clutter in indexes, since this type is not used by any search
|
|
56
|
//@Indexed(index = "eu.etaxonomy.cdm.model.common.DefinedTermBase")
|
|
57
|
@Audited
|
|
58
|
public class TaxonRelationshipType extends RelationshipTermBase<TaxonRelationshipType> {
|
|
59
|
private static final long serialVersionUID = 6575652105931691670L;
|
|
60
|
@SuppressWarnings("unused")
|
|
61
|
private static final Logger logger = Logger.getLogger(TaxonRelationshipType.class);
|
|
62
|
|
|
63
|
protected static Map<UUID, TaxonRelationshipType> termMap = null;
|
|
64
|
|
|
65
|
@Deprecated //will be removed in future versions. Use Classification/TaxonNode instead
|
|
66
|
private static final UUID uuidTaxonomicallyIncludedIn = UUID.fromString("d13fecdf-eb44-4dd7-9244-26679c05df1c");
|
|
67
|
|
|
68
|
private static final UUID uuidMisappliedNameFor = UUID.fromString("1ed87175-59dd-437e-959e-0d71583d8417");
|
|
69
|
private static final UUID uuidProParteMisappliedNameFor = UUID.fromString("b59b4bd2-11ff-45d1-bae2-146efdeee206");
|
|
70
|
private static final UUID uuidPartialMisappliedNameFor = UUID.fromString("859fb615-b0e8-440b-866e-8a19f493cd36");
|
|
71
|
public static final UUID uuidProParteSynonymFor = UUID.fromString("8a896603-0fa3-44c6-9cd7-df2d8792e577");
|
|
72
|
public static final UUID uuidPartialSynonymFor = UUID.fromString("9d7a5e56-973c-474c-b6c3-a1cb00833a3c");
|
|
73
|
private static final UUID uuidInvalidDesignationFor = UUID.fromString("605b1d01-f2b1-4544-b2e0-6f08def3d6ed");
|
|
74
|
|
|
75
|
private static final UUID uuidContradiction = UUID.fromString("a8f03491-2ad6-4fae-a04c-2a4c117a2e9b");
|
|
76
|
private static final UUID uuidCongruentTo = UUID.fromString("60974c98-64ab-4574-bb5c-c110f6db634d");
|
|
77
|
private static final UUID uuidIncludes = UUID.fromString("0501c385-cab1-4fbe-b945-fc747419bb13");
|
|
78
|
private static final UUID uuidOverlaps = UUID.fromString("2046a0fd-4fd6-45a1-b707-2b91547f3ec7");
|
|
79
|
private static final UUID uuidExcludes = UUID.fromString("4535a63c-4a3f-4d69-9350-7bf02e2c23be");
|
|
80
|
private static final UUID uuidDoesNotExclude = UUID.fromString("0e5099bb-87c0-400e-abdc-bcfed5b5eece");
|
|
81
|
private static final UUID uuidDoesNotOverlap = UUID.fromString("ecd2382b-3d94-4169-9dd2-2c4ea1d24605");
|
|
82
|
private static final UUID uuidNotIncludedIn = UUID.fromString("89dffa4e-e004-4d42-b0d1-ae1827529e43");
|
|
83
|
private static final UUID uuidNotCongruentTo = UUID.fromString("6c16c33b-cfc5-4a00-92bd-a9f9e448f389");
|
|
84
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
86
|
private static final UUID uuidCongruentToOrIncludes = UUID.fromString("b55cb3a2-6e20-4ca3-95bc-12b59d3235b0");
|
|
87
|
private static final UUID uuidIncludedInOrIncludes = UUID.fromString("c3ed5089-6779-4051-bb24-f5ea0eca80d5");
|
|
88
|
private static final UUID uuidCongruentIncludedInOrIncludes = UUID.fromString("0170cd83-93ad-43c2-9ad1-7ac879300e2f");
|
|
89
|
private static final UUID uuidCongruentToOrOverlaps = UUID.fromString("78355cfa-5200-432f-8e00-82b97afad0ed");
|
|
90
|
private static final UUID uuidIncludesOrOverlaps = UUID.fromString("f1ec567b-3c73-436b-8625-b4fd53588abb");
|
|
91
|
|
|
92
|
private static final UUID uuidCongruentToOrIncludesOrOverlaps = UUID.fromString("2d923b1a-6c0f-414c-ac9b-bbc502e18078");
|
|
93
|
private static final UUID uuidIncludedInOrIncludesOrOverlaps = UUID.fromString("43466aa9-e431-4f37-8bca-febfd9f63716");
|
|
94
|
private static final UUID uuidCongruentToOrExcludes = UUID.fromString("758e6cf3-05a0-49ed-9496-d8c4a9fd02ae");
|
|
95
|
private static final UUID uuidIncludesOrExcludes = UUID.fromString("6ee440bc-fd3d-4da2-ad85-906d35a94731");
|
|
96
|
private static final UUID uuidCongruentToOrIncludesOrExcludes = UUID.fromString("d5c6953d-aa53-46f8-aafc-ebc6428ad5d0");
|
|
97
|
private static final UUID uuidIncludedInOrIncludesOrExcludes = UUID.fromString("43d8492c-8bd5-4f38-a633-f1ad910a34dd");
|
|
98
|
private static final UUID uuidOverlapsOrExcludes = UUID.fromString("623ecdeb-ff1f-471d-a8dc-0d75b2fe8d94");
|
|
99
|
private static final UUID uuidCongruentToOrOverlapsOrExcludes = UUID.fromString("6fabef72-5264-44f1-bfc0-8e2e141375f2");
|
|
100
|
private static final UUID uuidIncludesOrOverlapsOrExcludes = UUID.fromString("b7153c89-cc6c-4f8c-bf74-216f10feac46");
|
|
101
|
|
|
102
|
private static final UUID uuidAllRelationships = UUID.fromString("831fcd88-e5c9-49e0-b06e-bbb67d1c05c9");
|
|
103
|
|
|
104
|
private static final UUID uuidUnclear = UUID.fromString("4c48ba25-c1d0-4bdd-9260-c1fa2e42a5d3");
|
|
105
|
private static final UUID uuidNotYetWorkedOn = UUID.fromString("8d47e59a-790d-428f-8060-01d443519166");
|
|
106
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
111
|
public static TaxonRelationshipType NewInstance(String term, String label, String labelAbbrev, boolean symmetric, boolean transitive) {
|
|
112
|
return new TaxonRelationshipType(term, label, labelAbbrev, symmetric, transitive);
|
|
113
|
}
|
|
114
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
116
|
//********************************** CONSTRUCTOR *********************************/
|
|
117
|
|
|
118
|
/**
|
|
119
|
* @deprecated for inner (hibernate) use only
|
|
120
|
*/
|
|
121
|
@Deprecated
|
|
122
|
protected TaxonRelationshipType() {
|
|
123
|
super(TermType.TaxonRelationshipType);
|
|
124
|
}
|
|
125
|
/**
|
|
126
|
* Class constructor: creates an additional taxon relationship type
|
|
127
|
* instance with a description (in the {@link eu.etaxonomy.cdm.model.common.Language#DEFAULT() default language}), a label,
|
|
128
|
* a label abbreviation and the flags indicating whether this new taxon
|
|
129
|
* relationship type is symmetric and/or transitive.
|
|
130
|
*
|
|
131
|
* @param term the string (in the default language) describing the
|
|
132
|
* new taxon relationship type to be created
|
|
133
|
* @param label the string identifying the new taxon relationship
|
|
134
|
* type to be created
|
|
135
|
* @param labelAbbrev the string identifying (in abbreviated form) the
|
|
136
|
* new taxon relationship type to be created
|
|
137
|
* @param symmetric the boolean indicating whether the new taxon
|
|
138
|
* relationship type to be created is symmetric
|
|
139
|
* @param transitive the boolean indicating whether the new taxon
|
|
140
|
* relationship type to be created is transitive
|
|
141
|
* @see #TaxonRelationshipType()
|
|
142
|
*/
|
|
143
|
private TaxonRelationshipType(String term, String label, String labelAbbrev, boolean symmetric, boolean transitive) {
|
|
144
|
super(TermType.TaxonRelationshipType, term, label, labelAbbrev, symmetric, transitive);
|
|
145
|
}
|
|
146
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
148
|
//************************** METHODS ********************************
|
|
149
|
|
|
150
|
@Override
|
|
151
|
public void resetTerms(){
|
|
152
|
termMap = null;
|
|
153
|
}
|
|
154
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
156
|
protected static TaxonRelationshipType getTermByUuid(UUID uuid){
|
|
157
|
if (termMap == null || termMap.isEmpty()){
|
|
158
|
return getTermByClassAndUUID(TaxonRelationshipType.class, uuid);
|
|
159
|
} else {
|
|
160
|
return termMap.get(uuid);
|
|
161
|
}
|
|
162
|
}
|
|
163
|
|
|
164
|
/**
|
|
165
|
* <code>true</code> if this relationship type is {@link #isAnyMisappliedName()
|
|
166
|
* any of the misapplied name relationship types} or an
|
|
167
|
* {@link #INVALID_DESIGNATION_FOR() invalid designation}
|
|
168
|
*
|
|
169
|
* @see #isAnyMisappliedName()()
|
|
170
|
*/
|
|
171
|
public boolean isMisappliedNameOrInvalidDesignation(){
|
|
172
|
if (this.isAnyMisappliedName()){
|
|
173
|
return true;
|
|
174
|
}else if (isInvalidDesignation()){
|
|
175
|
return true;
|
|
176
|
}
|
|
177
|
return false;
|
|
178
|
}
|
|
179
|
|
|
180
|
/**
|
|
181
|
* <code>true</code> if this relationship type is an
|
|
182
|
* {@link #INVALID_DESIGNATION_FOR() invalid designation}
|
|
183
|
*
|
|
184
|
* @see #isAnyMisappliedName()()
|
|
185
|
*/
|
|
186
|
public boolean isInvalidDesignation(){
|
|
187
|
if (this.equals(INVALID_DESIGNATION_FOR())){
|
|
188
|
return true;
|
|
189
|
}
|
|
190
|
return false;
|
|
191
|
}
|
|
192
|
|
|
193
|
/**
|
|
194
|
* <code>true</code> if this relationship type is any
|
|
195
|
* of the misapplied name relationships such as
|
|
196
|
* {@link #MISAPPLIED_NAME_FOR()} or {@link #PRO_PARTE_MISAPPLIED_NAME_FOR()}
|
|
197
|
*
|
|
198
|
* @see #isMisappliedNameOrInvalidDesignation()
|
|
199
|
*/
|
|
200
|
public boolean isAnyMisappliedName(){
|
|
201
|
return (allMisappliedNameTypes().contains(this));
|
|
202
|
}
|
|
203
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
205
|
/**
|
|
206
|
* <code>true</code> if this relationship type is any
|
|
207
|
* of the pro parte or partial synonym relationship types
|
|
208
|
* {@link #PRO_PARTE_SYNONYM_FOR()} or {@link #PARTIAL_SYNONYM_FOR()}
|
|
209
|
*
|
|
210
|
* @see #isAnyMisappliedName()
|
|
211
|
*/
|
|
212
|
public boolean isAnySynonym(){
|
|
213
|
return (allSynonymTypes().contains(this));
|
|
214
|
}
|
|
215
|
|
|
216
|
/**
|
|
217
|
* <code>true</code> if this relationship type is either
|
|
218
|
* a pro parte synonym or a pro parte misapplied name relationship type
|
|
219
|
* {@link #PRO_PARTE_SYNONYM_FOR()} or {@link #PRO_PARTE_MISAPPLIED_NAME_FOR}
|
|
220
|
*/
|
|
221
|
public boolean isProParte(){
|
|
222
|
return (allProParteTypes().contains(this));
|
|
223
|
}
|
|
224
|
|
|
225
|
/**
|
|
226
|
* <code>true</code> if this relationship type is either
|
|
227
|
* a partial synonym or a partial misapplied name relationship type
|
|
228
|
* {@link #PARTIAL_SYNONYM_FOR()} or {@link #PARTIAL_MISAPPLIED_NAME_FOR}
|
|
229
|
*
|
|
230
|
* @see #isProParte()
|
|
231
|
*/
|
|
232
|
public boolean isPartial(){
|
|
233
|
return (allPartialTypes().contains(this));
|
|
234
|
}
|
|
235
|
|
|
236
|
/**
|
|
237
|
* Returns a list of all misapplied name relationship
|
|
238
|
* types such as "misapplied name for" and
|
|
239
|
* "pro parte misapplied name for".
|
|
240
|
*
|
|
241
|
* @see #MISAPPLIED_NAME_FOR()
|
|
242
|
* @see #PRO_PARTE_MISAPPLIED_NAME_FOR()
|
|
243
|
*/
|
|
244
|
public static Set<TaxonRelationshipType> allMisappliedNameTypes(){
|
|
245
|
Set<TaxonRelationshipType> result = new HashSet<>();
|
|
246
|
result.add(MISAPPLIED_NAME_FOR());
|
|
247
|
result.add(PRO_PARTE_MISAPPLIED_NAME_FOR());
|
|
248
|
result.add(PARTIAL_MISAPPLIED_NAME_FOR());
|
|
249
|
return result;
|
|
250
|
}
|
|
251
|
|
|
252
|
public static Set<TaxonRelationshipType> allSynonymTypes(){
|
|
253
|
Set<TaxonRelationshipType> result = new HashSet<>();
|
|
254
|
result.add(PRO_PARTE_SYNONYM_FOR());
|
|
255
|
result.add(PARTIAL_SYNONYM_FOR());
|
|
256
|
return result;
|
|
257
|
}
|
|
258
|
|
|
259
|
public static Set<TaxonRelationshipType> allProParteTypes(){
|
|
260
|
Set<TaxonRelationshipType> result = new HashSet<>();
|
|
261
|
result.add(PRO_PARTE_SYNONYM_FOR());
|
|
262
|
result.add(PRO_PARTE_MISAPPLIED_NAME_FOR());
|
|
263
|
return result;
|
|
264
|
}
|
|
265
|
|
|
266
|
public static Set<TaxonRelationshipType> allPartialTypes(){
|
|
267
|
Set<TaxonRelationshipType> result = new HashSet<>();
|
|
268
|
result.add(PARTIAL_SYNONYM_FOR());
|
|
269
|
result.add(PARTIAL_MISAPPLIED_NAME_FOR());
|
|
270
|
return result;
|
|
271
|
}
|
|
272
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
274
|
/**
|
|
275
|
* Returns <code>true</code>, if this relationship type is not a <i>misapplied name for<i>
|
|
276
|
* and also no <i>taxonomically included in</i> relationship.<BR>
|
|
277
|
* It assumes that all other relationships are concept relationships.
|
|
278
|
* @return
|
|
279
|
*/
|
|
280
|
public boolean isConceptRelationship(){
|
|
281
|
if (this.isMisappliedNameOrInvalidDesignation()){
|
|
282
|
return false;
|
|
283
|
}else if (this.equals(TAXONOMICALLY_INCLUDED_IN())){
|
|
284
|
return false;
|
|
285
|
}
|
|
286
|
return true;
|
|
287
|
}
|
|
288
|
|
|
289
|
/**
|
|
290
|
* Returns the taxon relationship type "is taxonomically included in". This
|
|
291
|
* indicates that the {@link TaxonRelationship#getFromTaxon() source taxon}
|
|
292
|
* in such a {@link TaxonRelationship taxon relationship} has the target {@link Taxon taxon}
|
|
293
|
* as immediate next higher parent within the classification. Generally
|
|
294
|
* the {@link Taxon#getSec() concept reference} of both taxa are the same
|
|
295
|
* except if the concept reference follows the taxonomical opinion of
|
|
296
|
* another reference.<BR>
|
|
297
|
* This type is neither symmetric nor transitive.
|
|
298
|
* @deprecated will be removed in version 3.0
|
|
299
|
*/
|
|
300
|
@Deprecated
|
|
301
|
public static final TaxonRelationshipType TAXONOMICALLY_INCLUDED_IN(){
|
|
302
|
return getTermByUuid(uuidTaxonomicallyIncludedIn);
|
|
303
|
}
|
|
304
|
/**
|
|
305
|
* Returns the taxon relationship type "is misapplied name for". This
|
|
306
|
* indicates that the {@link eu.etaxonomy.cdm.model.name.TaxonName taxon name}
|
|
307
|
* of the {@link TaxonRelationship#getFromTaxon() source taxon}
|
|
308
|
* in such a {@link TaxonRelationship taxon relationship} has been erroneously used by
|
|
309
|
* the {@link TaxonBase#getSec() concept reference} to denominate the same real taxon
|
|
310
|
* as the one meant by the target {@link Taxon taxon}.<BR>
|
|
311
|
* This type is neither symmetric nor transitive.
|
|
312
|
*/
|
|
313
|
public static final TaxonRelationshipType MISAPPLIED_NAME_FOR(){
|
|
314
|
return getTermByUuid(uuidMisappliedNameFor);
|
|
315
|
}
|
|
316
|
/**
|
|
317
|
* Returns the taxon relationship type "is pro parte misapplied name for". This
|
|
318
|
* indicates that the {@link eu.etaxonomy.cdm.model.name.TaxonName taxon name} of the
|
|
319
|
* {@link TaxonRelationship#getFromTaxon() source taxon}
|
|
320
|
* in such a {@link TaxonRelationship taxon relationship} has been erroneously used by
|
|
321
|
* the {@link TaxonBase#getSec() concept reference} to (partly) denominate the same real taxon
|
|
322
|
* as the one meant by the target {@link Taxon taxon}. Additionaly another real taxon
|
|
323
|
* is (partly) denominated by the given name in the concept reference. Therefore it is called
|
|
324
|
* pro parte. <BR>
|
|
325
|
* This type is neither symmetric nor transitive.
|
|
326
|
*
|
|
327
|
* @see #MISAPPLIED_NAME_FOR()
|
|
328
|
* @see #PRO_PARTE_SYNONYM_FOR()
|
|
329
|
*/
|
|
330
|
public static final TaxonRelationshipType PRO_PARTE_MISAPPLIED_NAME_FOR(){
|
|
331
|
return getTermByUuid(uuidProParteMisappliedNameFor);
|
|
332
|
}
|
|
333
|
/**
|
|
334
|
* Returns the taxon relationship type "is partial misapplied name for". This
|
|
335
|
* indicates that the {@link eu.etaxonomy.cdm.model.name.TaxonName taxon name} of the
|
|
336
|
* {@link TaxonRelationship#getFromTaxon() source taxon}
|
|
337
|
* in such a {@link TaxonRelationship taxon relationship} has been erroneously used by
|
|
338
|
* the {@link TaxonBase#getSec() concept reference} to (partly) denominate the same real taxon
|
|
339
|
* as the one meant by the target {@link Taxon taxon}. In contrary to a
|
|
340
|
* {@link #PRO_PARTE_MISAPPLIED_NAME_FOR() pro parte misapplied name} no other real taxon
|
|
341
|
* is (partly) demoninated by the given name in the concept reference. Therefore it is called
|
|
342
|
* partial.<BR>
|
|
343
|
* This type is neither symmetric nor transitive.
|
|
344
|
*
|
|
345
|
* @see #MISAPPLIED_NAME_FOR()
|
|
346
|
* @see #PRO_PARTE_MISAPPLIED_NAME_FOR()
|
|
347
|
* @see #PARTIAL_SYNONYM_FOR()
|
|
348
|
* @see #INCLUDES()
|
|
349
|
*/
|
|
350
|
public static final TaxonRelationshipType PARTIAL_MISAPPLIED_NAME_FOR(){
|
|
351
|
return getTermByUuid(uuidPartialMisappliedNameFor);
|
|
352
|
}
|
|
353
|
/**
|
|
354
|
* Returns the taxon relationship type "is pro parte synonym for". This
|
|
355
|
* indicates that the {@link eu.etaxonomy.cdm.model.name.TaxonName taxon name} of the
|
|
356
|
* {@link TaxonRelationship#getFromTaxon() source taxon}
|
|
357
|
* in such a {@link TaxonRelationship taxon relationship} has been used as a
|
|
358
|
* pro parte synonym.<BR>
|
|
359
|
* This type is neither symmetric nor transitive.
|
|
360
|
*
|
|
361
|
* @see #PRO_PARTE_MISAPPLIED_NAME_FOR()
|
|
362
|
*/
|
|
363
|
public static final TaxonRelationshipType PRO_PARTE_SYNONYM_FOR(){
|
|
364
|
return getTermByUuid(uuidProParteSynonymFor);
|
|
365
|
}
|
|
366
|
/**
|
|
367
|
* Returns the taxon relationship type "is partial synonym for". This
|
|
368
|
* indicates that the {@link eu.etaxonomy.cdm.model.name.TaxonName taxon name} of the
|
|
369
|
* {@link TaxonRelationship#getFromTaxon() source taxon}
|
|
370
|
* in such a {@link TaxonRelationship taxon relationship} has been used as a
|
|
371
|
* partial synonym.<BR>
|
|
372
|
* This type is neither symmetric nor transitive.
|
|
373
|
*
|
|
374
|
* @see #PRO_PARTE_SYNONYM_FOR()
|
|
375
|
* @see #PARTIAL_MISAPPLIED_NAME_FOR()
|
|
376
|
*/
|
|
377
|
public static final TaxonRelationshipType PARTIAL_SYNONYM_FOR(){
|
|
378
|
return getTermByUuid(uuidPartialSynonymFor);
|
|
379
|
}
|
|
380
|
|
|
381
|
/**
|
|
382
|
* Returns the taxon relationship type "is invalid designation for". This
|
|
383
|
* indicates that the {@link eu.etaxonomy.cdm.model.name.TaxonName taxon name} of the {@link TaxonRelationship#getFromTaxon() source taxon}
|
|
384
|
* in such a {@link TaxonRelationship taxon relationship} has
|
|
385
|
* {@link eu.etaxonomy.cdm.model.name.NomenclaturalStatusType#isInvalidType() not been validly published} but was intended to denominate
|
|
386
|
* a real taxon which is the same as the one meant by the target {@link Taxon taxon}.<BR>
|
|
387
|
* According to the nomenclature codes a not validly published taxon name is
|
|
388
|
* not a taxon name at all.<BR>
|
|
389
|
* This type is neither symmetric nor transitive.
|
|
390
|
*/
|
|
391
|
public static final TaxonRelationshipType INVALID_DESIGNATION_FOR(){
|
|
392
|
return getTermByUuid(uuidInvalidDesignationFor);
|
|
393
|
}
|
|
394
|
/**
|
|
395
|
* Returns the (concept) taxon relationship type "is impossible"
|
|
396
|
* (contradiction). This is a concept relationship type which means that the
|
|
397
|
* circumscriptions (the set of organisms/specimens that belong to a {@link Taxon taxon}
|
|
398
|
* according to the -maybe implicit- opinion of the {@link TaxonBase#getSec() concept reference})
|
|
399
|
* of both taxa involved in such a {@link TaxonRelationship taxon relationship} are
|
|
400
|
* beeing compared. In a concept relationship the concept references of the
|
|
401
|
* involved taxa must be distinct. <BR>
|
|
402
|
* The "is impossible" (contradiction) taxon relationship type arises
|
|
403
|
* logically if two or more incompatible (concept) taxon relationships
|
|
404
|
* between the two taxa already exist (for instance with the types
|
|
405
|
* "is congruent to" and "excludes").<BR>
|
|
406
|
* This type is symmetric but not transitive.
|
|
407
|
*/
|
|
408
|
public static final TaxonRelationshipType CONTRADICTION(){
|
|
409
|
return getTermByUuid(uuidContradiction);
|
|
410
|
}
|
|
411
|
/**
|
|
412
|
* Returns the (concept) taxon relationship type "is congruent to".
|
|
413
|
* This is a concept relationship type which means that the circumscriptions
|
|
414
|
* (the set of organisms/specimens that belong to a {@link Taxon taxon} according
|
|
415
|
* to the -maybe implicit- opinion of the {@link TaxonBase#getSec() concept reference})
|
|
416
|
* of both taxa involved in such a {@link TaxonRelationship taxon relationship} are
|
|
417
|
* beeing compared. In a concept relationship the concept references of the
|
|
418
|
* involved taxa must be distinct. <BR>
|
|
419
|
* The "is congruent to" taxon relationship type indicates that the
|
|
420
|
* circumscriptions of both taxa involved in the taxon relationship are
|
|
421
|
* identical.<BR>
|
|
422
|
* This type is symmetric and transitive.
|
|
423
|
*/
|
|
424
|
public static final TaxonRelationshipType CONGRUENT_TO(){
|
|
425
|
return getTermByUuid(uuidCongruentTo);
|
|
426
|
}
|
|
427
|
/**
|
|
428
|
* Returns the (concept) taxon relationship type "includes".
|
|
429
|
* This is a concept relationship type which means that the circumscriptions
|
|
430
|
* (the set of organisms/specimens that belong to a {@link Taxon taxon} according
|
|
431
|
* to the -maybe implicit- opinion of the {@link TaxonBase#getSec() concept reference})
|
|
432
|
* of both taxa involved in such a {@link TaxonRelationship taxon relationship} are
|
|
433
|
* beeing compared. In a concept relationship the concept references of the
|
|
434
|
* involved taxa must be distinct. <BR>
|
|
435
|
* The "includes" taxon relationship type indicates that each element
|
|
436
|
* belonging to the circumscription of the target taxon involved in the
|
|
437
|
* taxon relationship belongs to the circumscription of the source taxon,
|
|
438
|
* but that some elements belonging to the circumscription of the source
|
|
439
|
* taxon do not belong to the circumscription of the target taxon.<BR>
|
|
440
|
* This type is not symmetric but transitive.
|
|
441
|
*/
|
|
442
|
public static final TaxonRelationshipType INCLUDES(){
|
|
443
|
return getTermByUuid(uuidIncludes);
|
|
444
|
}
|
|
445
|
/**
|
|
446
|
* Returns the (concept) taxon relationship type "overlaps".
|
|
447
|
* This is a concept relationship type which means that the circumscriptions
|
|
448
|
* (the set of organisms/specimens that belong to a {@link Taxon taxon} according
|
|
449
|
* to the -maybe implicit- opinion of the {@link TaxonBase#getSec() concept reference})
|
|
450
|
* of both taxa involved in such a {@link TaxonRelationship taxon relationship} are
|
|
451
|
* beeing compared. In a concept relationship the concept references of the
|
|
452
|
* involved taxa must be distinct. <BR>
|
|
453
|
* The "overlaps" taxon relationship type indicates that both
|
|
454
|
* circumscriptions have common elements but that some elements belonging
|
|
455
|
* to the circumscription of the source taxon do not belong to the
|
|
456
|
* circumscription of the target taxon and vice-versa.<BR>
|
|
457
|
* This type is symmetric but not transitive.
|
|
458
|
*/
|
|
459
|
public static final TaxonRelationshipType OVERLAPS(){
|
|
460
|
return getTermByUuid(uuidOverlaps);
|
|
461
|
}
|
|
462
|
/**
|
|
463
|
* Returns the (concept) taxon relationship type "excludes".
|
|
464
|
* This is a concept relationship type which means that the circumscriptions
|
|
465
|
* (the set of organisms/specimens that belong to a {@link Taxon taxon} according
|
|
466
|
* to the -maybe implicit- opinion of the {@link TaxonBase#getSec() concept reference})
|
|
467
|
* of both taxa involved in such a {@link TaxonRelationship taxon relationship} are
|
|
468
|
* beeing compared. In a concept relationship the concept references of the
|
|
469
|
* involved taxa must be distinct. <BR>
|
|
470
|
* The "excludes" taxon relationship type indicates that both
|
|
471
|
* circumscriptions have no common elements.<BR>
|
|
472
|
* This type is symmetric but not transitive.
|
|
473
|
*/
|
|
474
|
public static final TaxonRelationshipType EXCLUDES(){
|
|
475
|
return getTermByUuid(uuidExcludes);
|
|
476
|
}
|
|
477
|
/**
|
|
478
|
* Returns the (concept) taxon relationship type "does not exclude".
|
|
479
|
* This is a concept relationship type which means that the circumscriptions
|
|
480
|
* (the set of organisms/specimens that belong to a {@link Taxon taxon} according
|
|
481
|
* to the -maybe implicit- opinion of the {@link TaxonBase#getSec() concept reference})
|
|
482
|
* of both taxa involved in such a {@link TaxonRelationship taxon relationship} are
|
|
483
|
* beeing compared. In a concept relationship the concept references of the
|
|
484
|
* involved taxa must be distinct. <BR>
|
|
485
|
* The "does not exclude" taxon relationship type indicates that both
|
|
486
|
* circumscriptions have common elements. This type is a generalisation of
|
|
487
|
* {@link #CONGRUENT_TO() "is congruent to"}, {@link #INCLUDES() "includes"} and {@link #OVERLAPS() "overlaps"}.<BR>
|
|
488
|
* This type is symmetric but not transitive.
|
|
489
|
*
|
|
490
|
* @see #EXCLUDES()
|
|
491
|
*/
|
|
492
|
public static final TaxonRelationshipType DOES_NOT_EXCLUDE(){
|
|
493
|
return getTermByUuid(uuidDoesNotExclude);
|
|
494
|
}
|
|
495
|
/**
|
|
496
|
* Returns the (concept) taxon relationship type "does not overlap".
|
|
497
|
* This is a concept relationship type which means that the circumscriptions
|
|
498
|
* (the set of organisms/specimens that belong to a {@link Taxon taxon} according
|
|
499
|
* to the -maybe implicit- opinion of the {@link TaxonBase#getSec() concept reference})
|
|
500
|
* of both taxa involved in such a {@link TaxonRelationship taxon relationship} are
|
|
501
|
* beeing compared. In a concept relationship the concept references of the
|
|
502
|
* involved taxa must be distinct. <BR>
|
|
503
|
* The "does not overlap" taxon relationship type is a generalisation of
|
|
504
|
* {@link #CONGRUENT_TO() "is congruent to"}, {@link #INCLUDES() "includes"} and {@link #EXCLUDES() "excludes"}.<BR>
|
|
505
|
* This type is symmetric but not transitive.
|
|
506
|
*
|
|
507
|
* @see #OVERLAPS()
|
|
508
|
*/
|
|
509
|
public static final TaxonRelationshipType DOES_NOT_OVERLAP(){
|
|
510
|
return getTermByUuid(uuidDoesNotOverlap);
|
|
511
|
}
|
|
512
|
/**
|
|
513
|
* Returns the (concept) taxon relationship type "is not included in".
|
|
514
|
* This is a concept relationship type which means that the circumscriptions
|
|
515
|
* (the set of organisms/specimens that belong to a {@link Taxon taxon} according
|
|
516
|
* to the -maybe implicit- opinion of the {@link TaxonBase#getSec() concept reference})
|
|
517
|
* of both taxa involved in such a {@link TaxonRelationship taxon relationship} are
|
|
518
|
* beeing compared. In a concept relationship the concept references of the
|
|
519
|
* involved taxa must be distinct. <BR>
|
|
520
|
* The "is not included in" taxon relationship type indicates that at least
|
|
521
|
* one element belonging to the circumscription of the source taxon involved
|
|
522
|
* in the taxon relationship does not belong to the circumscription of the
|
|
523
|
* target taxon. <BR>
|
|
524
|
* This type is neither symmetric nor transitive.
|
|
525
|
*
|
|
526
|
* @see #INCLUDES()
|
|
527
|
*/
|
|
528
|
public static final TaxonRelationshipType NOT_INCLUDED_IN(){
|
|
529
|
return getTermByUuid(uuidNotIncludedIn);
|
|
530
|
}
|
|
531
|
/**
|
|
532
|
* Returns the (concept) taxon relationship type "is not congruent to".
|
|
533
|
* This is a concept relationship type which means that the circumscriptions
|
|
534
|
* (the set of organisms/specimens that belong to a {@link Taxon taxon} according
|
|
535
|
* to the -maybe implicit- opinion of the {@link TaxonBase#getSec() concept reference})
|
|
536
|
* of both taxa involved in such a {@link TaxonRelationship taxon relationship} are
|
|
537
|
* beeing compared. In a concept relationship the concept references of the
|
|
538
|
* involved taxa must be distinct. <BR>
|
|
539
|
* The "is not congruent to" taxon relationship type indicates that at least
|
|
540
|
* one element belonging to one of both circumscriptions does not belong to
|
|
541
|
* the other circumscription. This type is a generalisation of
|
|
542
|
* {@link #INCLUDES() "includes"}, {@link #OVERLAPS() "overlaps"} and {@link #EXCLUDES() "excludes"}.<BR>
|
|
543
|
* This type is symmetric but not transitive.
|
|
544
|
*
|
|
545
|
* @see #CONGRUENT_TO()
|
|
546
|
*/
|
|
547
|
public static final TaxonRelationshipType NOT_CONGRUENT_TO(){
|
|
548
|
return getTermByUuid(uuidNotCongruentTo);
|
|
549
|
}
|
|
550
|
|
|
551
|
public static final TaxonRelationshipType CONGRUENT_OR_INCLUDES(){
|
|
552
|
return getTermByUuid(uuidCongruentToOrIncludes);
|
|
553
|
}
|
|
554
|
public static final TaxonRelationshipType INCLUDED_OR_INCLUDES(){
|
|
555
|
return getTermByUuid(uuidIncludedInOrIncludes);
|
|
556
|
}
|
|
557
|
public static final TaxonRelationshipType CONGRUENT_OR_INCLUDED_OR_INCLUDES(){
|
|
558
|
return getTermByUuid(uuidCongruentIncludedInOrIncludes);
|
|
559
|
}
|
|
560
|
public static final TaxonRelationshipType CONGRUENT_OR_OVERLAPS(){
|
|
561
|
return getTermByUuid(uuidCongruentToOrOverlaps);
|
|
562
|
}
|
|
563
|
|
|
564
|
public static final TaxonRelationshipType INCLUDES_OR_OVERLAPS(){
|
|
565
|
return getTermByUuid(uuidIncludesOrOverlaps);
|
|
566
|
}
|
|
567
|
|
|
568
|
public static final TaxonRelationshipType CONGRUENT_OR_INCLUDES_OR_EXCLUDES(){
|
|
569
|
return getTermByUuid(uuidCongruentToOrIncludesOrExcludes);
|
|
570
|
}
|
|
571
|
|
|
572
|
public static final TaxonRelationshipType INCLUDES_OR_EXCLUDES(){
|
|
573
|
return getTermByUuid(uuidIncludesOrExcludes);
|
|
574
|
}
|
|
575
|
|
|
576
|
public static final TaxonRelationshipType CONGRUENT_OR_EXCLUDES(){
|
|
577
|
return getTermByUuid(uuidCongruentToOrExcludes);
|
|
578
|
}
|
|
579
|
|
|
580
|
public static final TaxonRelationshipType INCLUDED_OR_INCLUDES_OR_OVERLAPS(){
|
|
581
|
return getTermByUuid(uuidIncludedInOrIncludesOrOverlaps);
|
|
582
|
}
|
|
583
|
|
|
584
|
public static final TaxonRelationshipType CONGRUENT_OR_INCLUDES_OR_OVERLAPS(){
|
|
585
|
return getTermByUuid(uuidCongruentToOrIncludesOrOverlaps);
|
|
586
|
}
|
|
587
|
|
|
588
|
public static final TaxonRelationshipType INCLUDES_OR_OVERLAPS_OR_EXCLUDES(){
|
|
589
|
return getTermByUuid(uuidIncludesOrOverlapsOrExcludes);
|
|
590
|
}
|
|
591
|
|
|
592
|
public static final TaxonRelationshipType CONGRUENT_OR_OVERLAPS_OR_EXCLUDES(){
|
|
593
|
return getTermByUuid(uuidCongruentToOrOverlapsOrExcludes);
|
|
594
|
}
|
|
595
|
|
|
596
|
public static final TaxonRelationshipType OVERLAPS_OR_EXCLUDES(){
|
|
597
|
return getTermByUuid(uuidOverlapsOrExcludes);
|
|
598
|
}
|
|
599
|
|
|
600
|
public static final TaxonRelationshipType INCLUDED_OR_INCLUDES_OR_EXCLUDES(){
|
|
601
|
return getTermByUuid(uuidIncludedInOrIncludesOrExcludes);
|
|
602
|
}
|
|
603
|
|
|
604
|
public static final TaxonRelationshipType UNCLEAR(){
|
|
605
|
return getTermByUuid(uuidUnclear);
|
|
606
|
}
|
|
607
|
|
|
608
|
public static final TaxonRelationshipType NOT_YET_WORKED_ON(){
|
|
609
|
return getTermByUuid(uuidNotYetWorkedOn);
|
|
610
|
}
|
|
611
|
|
|
612
|
|
|
613
|
@Override
|
|
614
|
protected void setDefaultTerms(TermVocabulary<TaxonRelationshipType> termVocabulary) {
|
|
615
|
termMap = new HashMap<UUID, TaxonRelationshipType>();
|
|
616
|
for (TaxonRelationshipType term : termVocabulary.getTerms()){
|
|
617
|
termMap.put(term.getUuid(), term);
|
|
618
|
}
|
|
619
|
}
|
|
620
|
|
|
621
|
//TODO other relationshipTypes
|
|
622
|
|
|
623
|
public static final TaxonRelationshipType ALL_RELATIONSHIPS(){
|
|
624
|
return getTermByUuid(uuidAllRelationships);
|
|
625
|
}
|
|
626
|
|
|
627
|
@Override
|
|
628
|
public TaxonRelationshipType readCsvLine(Class<TaxonRelationshipType> termClass, List<String> csvLine, TermType termType,
|
|
629
|
Map<UUID,DefinedTermBase> terms, boolean abbrevAsId) {
|
|
630
|
TaxonRelationshipType newInstance = super.readCsvLine(termClass, csvLine, termType, terms, abbrevAsId);
|
|
631
|
|
|
632
|
newInstance.setSymbol(newInstance.getIdInVocabulary());
|
|
633
|
String inverseLabelAbbrev = csvLine.get(7).trim();
|
|
634
|
newInstance.setInverseSymbol(inverseLabelAbbrev);
|
|
635
|
return newInstance;
|
|
636
|
}
|
|
637
|
}
|