EDIT: Issueshttps://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/https://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/redmine/favicon.ico?14691914852020-10-12T11:02:02ZEDIT Project Management
Redmine bug #9248 (New): ABCD import configuration is not fail save for creation of new classificationhttps://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/92482020-10-12T11:02:02ZKatja Luther
<p>When licking on "do not create new classification for new taxa" but missing to define the classification for adding the new taxa, a new classification is created for new taxa.</p>
<p><img src="https://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/attachments/download/1942/picture430-1.png" alt="" /></p>
bug #8817 (New): abcd import gathering date contains T00:00:00 when time is missinghttps://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/88172020-01-20T13:25:45ZKatja Luther
<p>The string comes from biocase and the parser is not able to parse it.<br>
This time information is wrong, this should be fixed in biocase but as a workaround we can remove it in the cdm parser.</p>
bug #8601 (Feedback): checkbox lists in preferences - button to expand, collapse, ... not funct...https://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/86012019-10-17T15:25:49ZAndreas Kohlbecker
<p>The button row on top of checkbox lists (Available Languages, Features) are not functional:</p>
<p><img src="https://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/attachments/download/1731/picture061-1.png" alt="" /></p>
<p>Hide them if there are plans to make them functional in the future otherwise they should be removed. </p>
bug #8586 (New): Feature checkbox lists in perferences can neither be modified nor be scrolled https://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/85862019-10-11T10:15:26ZAndreas Kohlbecker
<p>It is not possible to change the state or to scroll the list of checkbox items in the settings for Features, Languages</p>
<p>Tested in KDE 5.16.5 </p>
<ul>
<li>GTK2 Themes <em>Breeze</em> and <em>Raleigh</em></li>
<li>GTK3 Themes <em>Breeze</em> and <em>Emacs</em></li>
</ul>
<p>So it seems not to be a problem with in GTK or the theme.</p>
<p><strong>Scroll Problem:</strong></p>
<p>The solution to this seems to scroll the whole preference panel instead of the checkbox list itself. In the eclipse preferences it is throughout implemented like this. See for example <em>General -> Startup and Shutdown</em>, <em>Java -> Debug -> step filters</em> </p>
bug #8443 (New): a user with only rights on a subtree can edit taxa and names of another subtreehttps://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/84432019-08-05T10:14:44ZKatja Luther
<p>the user with rights on a subtree is able to edit taxa outside the defined subtree. The only limitation is creation and deleting of nodes.</p>
feature request #7863 (New): /homotypicGroup/{uuid}/homotypicGroupTypeDesignationsDTO webservice ...https://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/78632018-10-24T13:22:53ZAndreas Kohlbecker
<p>for details see <a class="issue tracker-5 status-2 priority-10 priority-lowest" title="feature request: web service providing compact TypeDesignation representation for homotypic groups and individual ... (In Progress)" href="https://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/7695#note-9">#7695#note-9</a></p>
bug #7167 (New): dwca-export-controller documentation issueshttps://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/71672018-01-11T15:00:21ZAndreas Kohlbecker
<ul>
<li>the contoller method exportGetExplanation() which is mapped to <code>/dwca</code> returns an html page which will in future contain the documentation of the webservice. The documentation however is in general produced through swagger. Therefore this method seems to be a concurrent approach to produce webservice documentation. I advocate for removing this method and to add proper swagger annotations where needed.</li>
<li>swagger annotations are at least need for all request parameters of the type <code>UuidList</code>. All these appear as <code>List<String></code> in swagger, so the user does not know what to pass to the web service. </li>
<li>Passing an invalid uuid as <code>classification</code> causes a <em>Error 400 Bad Request</em> with no further information on the cause, better error reporting is neede here</li>
</ul>
bug #7034 (New): 4 busy database connections after application starthttps://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/70342017-10-25T14:06:18ZAndreas Kohlbecker
<p>After a cdmlib-remote instance has started the c3p0 connections pool holds 4 open connections which are reported as being busy. </p>
<p>During the application start these connections are apparently not being closed correcty</p>
<hr>
<p>Current state: 3 open connections</p>
feature request #7004 (New): Adapt save option in specimen hierarchy editor to bulk editorhttps://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/70042017-10-04T09:34:21ZPatrick Plitzner
<p>Andreas:</p>
<p>die erneute Suche im Specimen Tree Editor, nachdem man etwas editiert hat, erlaubt weiterhin nur Save oder Cancel:</p>
<p>Das müssen wir dringend an das Vorgehen bei den Bulk Editoren anpassen, welche Search (Save), Search (No Save) und Cancel zulassen.</p>
bug #6966 (New): "no file found" warning missing in simple media details viewhttps://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/69662017-09-21T12:43:25ZPatrick Plitzner
<p>Copied from <a class="issue tracker-4 status-5 priority-11 priority-default closed" title="bug: The Media details view does not show the full image (Closed)" href="https://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/6949">#6949</a>:</p>
<p>"There is an issue now which I don't know if it is related. If entering an URL which does not link to any file the "No file found" warning is only shown in advanced view. Is this wanted. Also I would expect that it is shown below the according URL of the MediaRepresentationPart but it is shown on bottom of the Media section."</p>
feature request #6644 (New): Adapt sortindex updater and cache updater to new ImportResult infras...https://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/66442017-05-17T14:00:46ZAndreas Müllerbug #6422 (New): 'Specified key was too long' on creating a new database https://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/64222017-02-15T08:13:52ZAndreas Kohlbecker
<p>issue copied from <a class="issue tracker-5 status-5 priority-11 priority-default closed" title="feature request: Problem with writing ehCache folder on network drive using UNC path (net.sf.ehcache.CacheException) (Closed)" href="https://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/5848">#5848</a></p>
<p>Originally reported by Ben Stöver. Had problems when creating a new database from within the taxeditor on a windows machine. Specific to this OS setup is that the user.home is on a network drive which was causing the problems described in <a class="issue tracker-5 status-5 priority-11 priority-default closed" title="feature request: Problem with writing ehCache folder on network drive using UNC path (net.sf.ehcache.CacheException) (Closed)" href="https://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/5848">#5848</a>, which are most probably not related to the problem which is the subject here:</p>
<p><em>When creating a new database on C the following error occurred a number of times: "ERROR [org.hibernate.tool.hbm2ddl.SchemaExport] - Specified key was too long; max key length is 1000 bytes".</em></p>
bug #6217 (New): Adapt colour mapping in dataportalshttps://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/62172016-11-24T10:06:50ZAndreas Müller
<p>Currently there is the possibility to adapt the color of a PresenceAbsenceTerm in a distribution map by using the according experimental feature.</p>
<p>There are 2 issues about it:</p>
<ul>
<li><p>Currently it uses idInVocabulary, which is not necessarily a unique attribute. We should switch to uuid. Even if this is not easy to read for humans, it is exact. As this feature should be used only for exceptional cases (e.g. multiple data portals on one database) this is acceptable.</p></li>
<li><p>The documentation needs to be updated. It should be clearly stated that this feature should be used ONLY if the defaultColor attribute of PresenceAbsenceTerm can not be used. Also the given abbreviations for the terms should be removed as they are partly wrong now (since last model update) and should not be used anymore (see above)</p></li>
</ul>
feature request #4118 (Feedback): @NotPartOf Annotation to exclude properties from the permission...https://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/41182014-03-12T12:04:31ZAndreas Kohlbecker
<p>successor ticket to #4081 (TaxonNodeServiceImpl.makeTaxonNodeASynonymOfAnotherTaxonNode() requires TAXONNAMEBASE.[UPDATE])</p>
<p>The <code>CdmSecurityHibernateInterceptor</code> has a map which defines properties per type that will be excluded from the permission validation. We need new Annotation <code>@NotPartOf</code> to populate this map in a dynamic way. This annotation will indicate that the annotated property is not a crucial part of the type and that this property should be excluded from the permission validation</p>
task #578 (In Progress): @Ignore removed from PersistentTermInitializerTesthttps://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/5782009-02-05T10:57:22ZAndreas Müller
<p>Hi Ben,</p>
<p>Yes probably you right. I didn't really go into the PersistentTermInitializerTest problem but tried it within eclipse with the new override.properties and it worked whereas in maven it doesn't </p>
<p>Caused by: java.lang.ClassCastException: org.hibernate.collection.PersistentSet cannot be cast to java.util.SortedSet</p>
<pre> at eu.etaxonomy.cdm.model.common.OrderedTermVocabulary.addTerm(OrderedTermVocabulary.java:154)
at eu.etaxonomy.cdm.model.common.OrderedTermVocabulary.addTerm(OrderedTermVocabulary.java:1)
at eu.etaxonomy.cdm.database.PersistentTermInitializer.firstPass(PersistentTermInitializer.java:141)
at eu.etaxonomy.cdm.database.PersistentTermInitializer.initialize(PersistentTermInitializer.java:87)
</pre>
<p>I will leave the test as @Ignored for now.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Andreas</p>
<p>----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----</p>
<p>Von: Ben Clark <a href="mailto:B.Clark@kew.org">B.Clark@kew.org</a> </p>
<p>Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. Februar 2009 11:07</p>
<p>An: '<a href="mailto:dev-cdmlib@mnhn.fr">dev-cdmlib@mnhn.fr</a>'</p>
<p>Betreff: RE: [dev-cdmlib] I want to commit some major changes to cdmlib term loading, please could you confirm that this is ok?</p>
<p>Hi Andreas,</p>
<blockquote>
<p>For PersistentTermInitializerTest I had to create a new override.properties because for this test it looks like > we need term initializing. Or do I think the wrong way here?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I'm not sure what to do about PersistentTermInitializerTest, really, as running it side-by-side with the other tests (which use testing term initializer) results in some issues. I think disabling it using override.properties simply checks against the terms initialized by TestingTermInitializer, not actually testing the PersistentTermInitializer at all.</p>
<p>I just @Ignore -ed it, not a perfect solution, but the whole term initialization scenario is quite complex and I couldn't think of a better idea. Running the other tests properly is more of a priority, I think.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<pre> Ben
</pre>