bug #9920
closedTypeDesignations appear mixed up in Registration Workingset Editor
100%
Description
Example Registration http://phycobank.org/102736 in test system:
- Collections:
- "Coll. Reichardt" sub-collection in "B - Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin"
- "Privatsammlung Ringel"
- Types (both with the same FieldUnit) for the name : "Abas xxxxxxxx Kusber in Zeitschrift für Tümpelkunde 1"
- Holotype: Åland Islands, xxxx (Coll. Reichardt 123).
- Isotype: Åland Islands, xxxx (Privatsammlung Ringel 456).
These data is displayed correctly in the data portal:
But the types are mixed up in the Registration Workingset Editor:
Files
Related issues
Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 2 years ago
- Tags set to phycobank
- Category set to cdm-vaadin
- Assignee set to Andreas Kohlbecker
- Priority changed from New to Highest
- Target version changed from Unassigned CDM tickets to Release 5.45
Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 2 years ago
- Subject changed from TypeDesignations in collection and sub-collections are mixed up in TypeDesignationWorkingSet to TypeDesignations appear mixed up in Registration Workingset Editor
Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 2 years ago
- Status changed from New to Resolved
- % Done changed from 0 to 50
Applied in changeset cdm-vaadin|a52dca4aceec75b445717c5d42deb045c8694abe.
Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 2 years ago
- Assignee changed from Andreas Kohlbecker to Wolf-Henning Kusber
fixed, please review once the test server is updated (tomorrow)
Updated by Wolf-Henning Kusber over 2 years ago
- Assignee changed from Wolf-Henning Kusber to Andreas Kohlbecker
- % Done changed from 50 to 70
TypeDesignations appear mixed up in Registration Workingset Editor is fixed.
But the wording ...type vs. ...types depends from the number of entries in the Collection part.
One collection in name field or one Code or one institution = ...type (if one accession number).
One collection in name field AND and one Institution OR
One collection in name field AND and one Collection
AND one accession number = typeS
Comment: because Collection and Institution are repeatable fields too many combination of fields are possible to fill.
Comment 2: The expected display might include the institution of collection and/or Town of a subcollection. To be discussed.
Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 2 years ago
- Assignee changed from Andreas Kohlbecker to Wolf-Henning Kusber
- % Done changed from 70 to 90
Wolf-Henning Kusber wrote in #note-6:
TypeDesignations appear mixed up in Registration Workingset Editor is fixed.
But the wording ...type vs. ...types depends from the number of entries in the Collection part.
The plural form problem is solved
Updated by Wolf-Henning Kusber about 2 years ago
- Assignee changed from Wolf-Henning Kusber to Andreas Kohlbecker
- % Done changed from 90 to 100
Both issues (mix, plural/singular) are fixed. The ticket can be closed.
Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 2 years ago
- Status changed from Resolved to Closed
Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 2 years ago
- Related to bug #9913: TypeDesignationEditor: Sub collections without code show blank in the collection select added
Updated by Andreas Müller about 2 years ago
- Target version changed from Release 5.45 to Release 5.29