EDIT

The disabling of the fields for two or more elements per feature is implemented.

Actually if one of the fields is empty it is handled the same, this need to be handled in a separate ticket.

Tested with Structured DDS Test:

• For Descripta prima there exist two elements for "bush property", they are greyed and not editable.
• Additional Tests to avoid regressions:
  • adding a new categorical element
  • add a state to an existing element
  • removing one state and all states
  • adding a new quantitative element
  • adding a new value to a quantitative element
  • removing one/all values of a quantitative element

This works as expected. Only a few minor thinks:

• for users it might be unclear why the cell is greyed. So maybe we could add a tooltip saying "Multiple data exist. Editing only possible in factual data view of specimen" or "... taxon" depending on the description type.
  Later we should also add an "open in" for each cell which opens the according factual data view. Can you create a ticket for this if not yet exists. The ticket could be more generic, also for complete rows (specimen description + taxon descriptions and taxa)

• the grey color is the same as for cells covered by a default value, we should distinguish them somehow. Best would be do show for default values simply a light grey text with the defined default value, but this might be not trivial to implement => new ticket, so maybe for now the default value cells could be made light brown or any other color (but not a strong color). This is because grey indicates that a cell is not editable while default cells are actually editable

Please decide what needs to be done in a new ticket and what can be done immediately with not much effort.

Katja Luther wrote:

Andreas Müller wrote:

This works as expected. Only a few minor thinks:

• for users it might be unclear why the cell is greyed. So maybe we could add a tooltip saying "Multiple data exist. Editing only possible in factual data view of specimen" or "... taxon" depending on the description type. Later we should also add an "open in" for each cell which opens the according factual data view. Can you create a ticket for this if not yet exists. The ticket could be more generic, also for complete rows (specimen description + taxon descriptions and taxa)

this is already part of #9800

• the grey color is the same as for cells covered by a default value, we should distinguish them somehow. Best would be do show for default values simply a light grey text with the defined default value, but this might be not trivial to implement => new ticket, so maybe for now the default value cells could be made light brown or any other color (but not a strong color). This is because grey indicates that a cell is not editable while default cells are actually editable

Please decide what needs to be done in a new ticket and what can be done immediately with not much effort.

for this release a tooltip for the disabled field is implemented and the grey of fields with default value is a little bit brighter.

Katja Luther wrote:

Katja Luther wrote:

Andreas Müller wrote:

This works as expected. Only a few minor thinks:

• for users it might be unclear why the cell is greyed. So maybe we could add a tooltip saying "Multiple data exist. Editing only possible in factual data view of specimen" or "... taxon" depending on the description type. Later we should also add an "open in" for each cell which opens the according factual data view. Can you create a ticket for this if not yet exists. The ticket could be more generic, also for complete rows (specimen description + taxon descriptions and taxa)

this is already part of #9800

• the grey color is the same as for cells covered by a default value, we should distinguish them somehow. Best would be do show for default values simply a light grey text with the defined default value, but this might be not trivial to implement => new ticket, so maybe for now the default value cells could be made light brown or any other color (but not a strong color). This is because grey indicates that a cell is not editable while default cells are actually editable

Please decide what needs to be done in a new ticket and what can be done immediately with not much effort.

for this release a tooltip for the disabled field is implemented and the grey of fields with default value is a little bit brighter.

tested with Structured DDS Test for taxon and specimen descriptions

I found an open issue: The literature description of Descripta prima in the test dataset for bush color has 1 record with only "yellow" and another one with "Yellow, Blue" the resulting shown record is "Yellow, Blue" which leads to a strange result in aggregation where both records are countet. So aggregation leads to "Yellow(2), Blue" plus additional values from other records. Do we use different label providers for aggegated data and for greyed data? Or is there another reason?

If not I guess we should try to use the same label provider to avoid confusion.

Katja Luther wrote:

The count is integrated in the description elements and is filled during aggregation, it is not the count of the description elements belonging to a feature in one description.

Ok, I understand. I forgot that we have an explicit count attibute now. However, we should think about a solution. Data like

are confusing for the user (at least for me they were).

However, as such data exist not very often it has not highest priority if difficult to implement.

Please do short review whether we can close this ticket.

Works as expected.