task #9624
closedtask #4338: [MASTER] Handle abbreviated title and protected cache correctly in TaxEditor
Centralize team formatting and fix et al. position handling
100%
Description
Formatting of teams is done at many places in cdmlib (TeamDefaultCacheStrategy, NomenclaturalSourceFormatting, TaxonBaseDefaultCacheStrategy, TaxonRelationshipFormatter, CdmLight export, fieldUnit formatting, ...).
As the functionality is more or less always the same (handling of et al. at a certain position or without, handling of hasMoreMembers, selection of best matching field/cache) it should be cetralized. Best place for this is the TeamDefaultCacheStrategy.
Also there are requests to not use et al. for bibliographic references anymore at a certain position (#9326, #7305). This can be fixed together.
Related issues
Updated by Andreas Müller almost 3 years ago
- Has duplicate feature request #9326: Show all authors in bibliographic references added
Updated by Andreas Müller almost 3 years ago
- Has duplicate feature request #7305: [Dicuss] searching for authorteam with more than three members is incomplete added
Updated by Andreas Müller almost 3 years ago
- Related to feature request #6662: Adapt person formatting, set initials behind lastname added
Updated by Andreas Müller almost 3 years ago
- Status changed from New to Resolved
- % Done changed from 0 to 50
This is generally fixed. Fine tuning is still required for correct et al. positions. Email was sent to users.
Updated by Andreas Müller almost 3 years ago
- Subject changed from Cetralize team formatting and fix et al. position handling to Centralize team formatting and fix et al. position handling
Updated by Andreas Müller almost 3 years ago
- Related to bug #6960: Improve reference cachestrategy added
Updated by Andreas Müller almost 3 years ago
- Target version changed from Release 5.25 to Release 5.23
Updated by Andreas Müller almost 3 years ago
AM: ... wird bei den err. sec. (und auch syn. sec. von pp-Synonymen) das „Kurzzitat“ noch mit >2 Autoren angezeigt. Auch hier die Frage, ob es evtl. nur historisch entstanden ist damals und eigentlich das normale Kurzzitat mit max. 2 Autoren verwendet werden kann/soll.
WGB: Es gibt m.A.n. keinen Grund, warum von der 2-Autoren-Regel abgewichen werden sollte (im Output) – ist, wie gesagt aber blöd, wenn in der Bibliographie dann uneindeutig (da helfen 3 Autoren aber auch nicht).
AM: ok, dann passe ich das an. In der Bibliographie erscheint ja sowieso das Vollzitat, das sollte damit eigentlich nichts zu tun haben, oder? Im Portal sowieso nicht, da es da ja verlinkt wird und nicht auf String-Vergleich basiert.
Updated by Andreas Müller almost 3 years ago
- Has duplicate bug #7817: Team caches should not show '& al.' added
Updated by Andreas Müller almost 3 years ago
- Status changed from Resolved to Closed
- % Done changed from 50 to 100
I think we can close this ticket. If there are open issues we should open new tickets.