Project

General

Profile

bug #9510

Improve label for descriptions created via DDS matrix

Added by Andreas Müller 4 months ago. Updated 2 months ago.

Status:
New
Priority:
New
Assignee:
Category:
taxeditor
Target version:
Start date:
03/04/2021
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Severity:
normal
Found in Version:
Tags:

Description

The automatically created label for a new "literature" description is something like {name of DDS}: Factual data set for {Taxon name}

"Factual data set" is not fully correct. It could be something like "...: Literature data for {Taxon name}"

Also from the matrix perspective it does not make so much sense to put the DDS name in front as all record visible there belong to this dataset. But from the factual data view perspective it may make sense so I have no better idea.

The same issue exists for taxon descriptions holding individual associations created via the matrix. They also use "Factual data set for {Taxon name}" which is too unspecific.

Maybe we could use something like "Specimen used by {name of DDS} for {taxon name}?

Also we need to think about the existing description relabeling during taxon operations (e.g. syn<->acc swap leads to a new label which has nothing to do with the old label anymore). The new label formatter is defined in the swap function in TaxonService (should be moved to model.format anyway).


Related issues

Related to Edit - bug #9488: Show details of description in character matrix Closed 03/01/2021
Related to Edit - feature request #9511: Move specimens/individual associations for matrix into same description New 03/04/2021
Related to Edit - feature request #8967: Improve label for cloned descriptions New 04/21/2020
Related to Edit - bug #9512: Descriptions being created for individual associations in matrix should have description status "Individual association" Closed 03/05/2021

History

#1 Updated by Andreas Müller 4 months ago

The above suggestion are only meant as first ideas. Please feel free to suggest/find better labels.

#2 Updated by Andreas Müller 4 months ago

  • Related to bug #9488: Show details of description in character matrix added

#3 Updated by Andreas Müller 4 months ago

  • Related to feature request #9511: Move specimens/individual associations for matrix into same description added

#4 Updated by Andreas Müller 4 months ago

  • Description updated (diff)

#5 Updated by Andreas Müller 4 months ago

Auch das Label der Specimen description selber entspricht noch nicht ganz dem, wie wir es mal besprochen haben:

===
Aus alter Mail (2019-11-20):

AM:

Mein Vorschlag wäre „Descriptive Data {Dataset Name} for {Taxon Name}“ oder andersherum. Allerdings wird das natürlich ein bisschen lang. Gleichzeitig sind aber die Bezüge zum Taxon, Dataset und dass es sich um Descriptive Data handelt recht essentiell um in jedem Kontext zu verstehen, worum es sich handelt.

AK:

Finde ich sehr gut!

NK:

ich auch

===

Derzeit scheint es eher sowas wie {Dataset name}: Specimen description for {Specimen titleCache} zu sein.
Oder haben wir uns da nach der Mail nochmal umentschieden.

Ich finde die Variante aus der Mail besser.

#6 Updated by Andreas Müller 4 months ago

... ich sehe gerade, dass die obige Labeldiskussion v.a. fürs Portal gedacht war, dennoch vielleicht auch passend für das Label der Description selber.

#7 Updated by Andreas Müller 4 months ago

#8 Updated by Andreas Müller 4 months ago

  • Description updated (diff)

#9 Updated by Andreas Müller 4 months ago

  • Related to bug #9512: Descriptions being created for individual associations in matrix should have description status "Individual association" added

#10 Updated by Katja Luther 2 months ago

  • Target version changed from Release 5.22 to Release 5.26

Also available in: Atom PDF

Add picture from clipboard (Maximum size: 40 MB)