bug #9369
closed
Reference Detail is missing in MediaSpecimen details view
Added by Andreas Müller over 3 years ago.
Updated about 3 years ago.
Description
but the detail often is important. In general we could also implement as like a (single) source but there is some more discussion on correct modelling needed so for now it is enough to add the ref detail.
Maybe when this is implemented we could also discuss if we should change the order of elements in the view.
My suggestion is to start with the URI which is the most important, followed by
- Kind of Media
- Motif (which is the media title)
----- (some space)
- prepared by
- preparation date
- method
----- (space)
- collection
- accession number
----- (space)
- published in
- published in detail
------- (space)
- publish flag
Files
- Description updated (diff)
- Status changed from New to Resolved
- Assignee changed from Katja Luther to Andreas Müller
- Priority changed from New to Priority14
- Status changed from Resolved to Feedback
- Assignee changed from Andreas Müller to Katja Luther
- % Done changed from 0 to 60
The missing reference detail is fixed.
The spaces between some fields are still missing.
Moving the URI to top as suggested in the ticket is not yet implemented but maybe this is difficult to implement as it is also possible to switch to the advanced view here. In this view the MediaRepresentation data should be at the end as it is now as otherwise it is confusing.
So if moving URI to top is not possible without changing current order in advanced view this is not necessary to do.
Another option is to move it below Motif as Kind of Media, Motiv and URI are the fields usually expected to be filled.
Andreas Müller wrote:
The missing reference detail is fixed.
The spaces between some fields are still missing.
Moving the URI to top as suggested in the ticket is not yet implemented but maybe this is difficult to implement as it is also possible to switch to the advanced view here. In this view the MediaRepresentation data should be at the end as it is now as otherwise it is confusing.
So if moving URI to top is not possible without changing current order in advanced view this is not necessary to do.
Another option is to move it below Motif as Kind of Media, Motiv and URI are the fields usually expected to be filled.
The URI is part of the mediaDetailElement, therefore the SpecimenMediaDetailElement needs to be implemented without reusing the mediaDetailElement.
- Status changed from Feedback to In Progress
- Target version changed from Release 5.19 to Release 5.21
move this ticket to 5.20 because moving the uri needs some more implementation.
- Copied to task #9421: [Discuss] Move URI to top in MediaSpecimen added
- Status changed from In Progress to Feedback
- Target version changed from Release 5.21 to Release 5.19
Katja Luther wrote:
move this ticket to 5.20 because moving the uri needs some more implementation.
Moving URI to top still needs to be discussed and is not really urgent. So I split this ticket which is mostly about the missing detail and move it back to 5.19.
However, the spaces are still open I guess. Can this be easily implemented without "reuse"-problems within this ticket? Move to #9421 otherwise and close this ticket.
- Status changed from Feedback to Resolved
- Assignee changed from Katja Luther to Andreas Müller
Spaces are added, please have a look
- Status changed from Resolved to Closed
- Assignee changed from Andreas Müller to Katja Luther
Also available in: Atom
PDF