bug #8905
closed
Description Handling in ABCD import
Added by Katja Luther about 4 years ago.
Updated about 4 years ago.
Description
mail AM:
bei der Korrektur der Additivity Daten in caryo_spp fällt mir auf, dass wenn Specimen im Zuge von ABCD-DNA Importen importiert wurden und an ein Taxon gehängt wurden, dies dazu führte, dass vermutlich bereits existierende Descriptions, widerverwendet wurden und ihnen ein neuer Titel gegeben wurde:
Das soll natürlich nicht so sein, da dann ja die Quelle fehlerhaft ist und Titel der Description unschön.
Kannst du mal checken, ob das grundsätzlich so ist beim ABCD (vielleicht auch nur DNA) Import?
Oder ist es konfigurierbar und wurde aus für mich nicht nachvollziehbaren Gründen von Patrick/Tilo so gemacht?
Oder kann es einen anderen Grund geben.
===
The default should be to create a new description, not to reuse it.
Files
- Description updated (diff)
- Description updated (diff)
The description handling is fixed now, but another problem is the titlecache creation. After adding a new source to the description the titleCache is created with all containing sources.
Katja Luther wrote:
The description handling is fixed now, but another problem is the titlecache creation. After adding a new source to the description the titleCache is created with all containing sources.
What exactly is the problem here? It is not incorrect that the titleCache changes if a source is added as long as it is for the new (ABCD based) description.
Andreas Müller wrote:
Katja Luther wrote:
The description handling is fixed now, but another problem is the titlecache creation. After adding a new source to the description the titleCache is created with all containing sources.
What exactly is the problem here? It is not incorrect that the titleCache changes if a source is added as long as it is for the new (ABCD based) description.
That was only the explanation why the titlecache of the description now contains the source of the import.
- Status changed from New to Resolved
- Assignee changed from Katja Luther to Andreas Müller
- Status changed from Resolved to Feedback
- Assignee changed from Andreas Müller to Katja Luther
Can you please add example data (webservice, example specimen) for reviewing?
For testing import:
File -> Import -> Specimen -> Specimen Online -> enter "bgbm*Herbar" in text field for biocase provider -> choose 'Herbarium Berolinense, Berlin (B) - http://ww3.bgbm.org/biocase/pywrapper.cgi?dsa=Herbar'->NEXT -> enter "B 10 0762132" as Accession Number
When Specimen Search view is updated, open the import configuration and select one time "reuse existing description group" and another time deselect it.
For the second test you can use the accession number "B 18 0011654".
Check the taxon Abies alba for newly created descriptions.
- Assignee changed from Katja Luther to Andreas Müller
- Status changed from Feedback to Closed
- Assignee changed from Andreas Müller to Katja Luther
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
This seems to work as expected now (though I still am not convinced that having the option to merge distributions if they have an explicit source makes much sense, but as this is not the default it is ok to leave this to the users and needs to be discussed elsewhere)
Also available in: Atom
PDF