Project

General

Profile

Actions

feature request #8657

closed

Order description element in portal according to CharacterTree

Added by Patrick Plitzner over 4 years ago. Updated about 4 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
New
Assignee:
Patrick Plitzner
Category:
cdm-dataportal
Target version:
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Estimated time:
Severity:
normal
Tags:

Files

picture552-1.png (2.5 KB) picture552-1.png Andreas Müller, 04/22/2020 06:12 PM

Related issues

Related to EDIT - feature request #8798: description page: Show character hierarchyResolvedAndreas Müller

Actions
Related to EDIT - bug #10195: Character data should be ordered by character treeNewKatja Luther

Actions
Copied to EDIT - task #8973: [DISCUSS] Should description tables reflect the feature tree hierarchy and/or empty feature nodes?NewAndreas Kohlbecker

Actions
Copied to EDIT - task #8974: [DISCUSS] Should freetext descriptions reflect the feature tree hierarchy and/or empty feature nodes?NewAndreas Kohlbecker

Actions
Actions #1

Updated by Patrick Plitzner over 4 years ago

  • Target version changed from Unassigned CDM tickets to 287
Actions #2

Updated by Patrick Plitzner over 4 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Resolved
  • % Done changed from 0 to 50
Actions #3

Updated by Patrick Plitzner over 4 years ago

  • Assignee changed from Patrick Plitzner to Andreas Müller

Assignin to you Andreas M.
But maybe also Andreas K. needs to look at the code

Actions #4

Updated by Andreas Müller over 4 years ago

Can you provide an example url?

Actions #5

Updated by Andreas Müller over 4 years ago

  • Target version changed from 287 to Release 5.12
Actions #7

Updated by Andreas Müller about 4 years ago

Maybe this ticket also covered the "freetext" description ordering like on http://caryophyllales.org/cactaceae/cdm_dataportal/taxon/b15ec01d-b909-4143-b197-e752b6f34d5b

Actions #8

Updated by Andreas Müller about 4 years ago

Currently only a flat list is created. I opened a new ticket to discuss if also the hierarchical structure should be reflected: #8973

Actions #9

Updated by Andreas Müller about 4 years ago

  • Copied to task #8973: [DISCUSS] Should description tables reflect the feature tree hierarchy and/or empty feature nodes? added
Actions #10

Updated by Andreas Müller about 4 years ago

  • Copied to task #8974: [DISCUSS] Should freetext descriptions reflect the feature tree hierarchy and/or empty feature nodes? added
Actions #11

Updated by Andreas Müller about 4 years ago

Andreas K., can you please check if the existing identation is caused by (wrong) handling of tree hierarchy or by a wrong general formatting/css?

I could image that it reflects the 2nd level of hierarchy but in the given case (e.g. http://caryophyllales.org/cactaceae/cdm_dataportal/description/f4fc4b11-90c7-4a02-b236-2d58f5891e6e) it does not make sense as there are no 1st level data. This is also strongly related #8973 then.

This is the only open issue which is not handled in other tickets yet. So we can close this ticket once the indentation is checked.

=> move this to #8798

Actions #12

Updated by Andreas Müller about 4 years ago

  • % Done changed from 50 to 80
Actions #13

Updated by Andreas Müller about 4 years ago

Actions #14

Updated by Andreas Müller about 4 years ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to Closed
  • Assignee changed from Andreas Kohlbecker to Patrick Plitzner
  • % Done changed from 80 to 100

I move the indentation issue to #8798 as it fits better there. And close this ticket.

Actions #15

Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago

  • Related to bug #10195: Character data should be ordered by character tree added
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF