bug #8584

Appended phrase should be shown on top level for misapplied names

Added by Andreas Müller 10 months ago. Updated 9 months ago.

Target version:
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:


Found in Version:


Currently when editing misapplied name relationships in details view the details view has a subsection for taxon information of the misapplied taxon. This is

  • titleCache
  • appended phrase
  • published
  • original taxon doubtful

while the sec reference (callend "sensu" here) and its detail are visible in the main section.

Appended phrase is similar to "sensu" an essential field for misapplied names as you may enter importantant information like "aucts.", "auct. europ." here. So it should be on same level like.

We may also discuss if the publish flag should be top level. As this is usually the only place where MAN are edited it is essential to see if the MAN is publish or not. This is similar to the handling of ordinary synonyms then.

Doubtful and cache may stay in the subsection as they are rarely used.

Related issues

Related to Edit - feature request #8649: Layout issues for misapplied name/pro parte synonyms New 11/05/2019

Associated revisions

Revision 9ca58dbb (diff)
Added by Katja Luther 9 months ago

ref #8584: move appended phrase and publish flag


#1 Updated by Andreas Müller 10 months ago

Was there a ticket which decided to create a subsection? If yes, please relate it to this ticket.

#2 Updated by Katja Luther 9 months ago

  • Status changed from New to Resolved
  • Assignee changed from Katja Luther to Andreas Müller

please have a look whether the order of the fields make sense. Now all taxon related fields are at the top of the section and the taxonrelation related field behind.

#3 Updated by Andreas Müller 9 months ago

Yes the order is correct now and also the selection for top level controls makes sense.

Some open minor issues (open new ticket if not immediately fixable):

  • Add identation (whitespace at beginning) for both "Detail" controls. They belong to the above controls "Sensu" and "Misappl. Sec.". In future they wil be part of a source sub-subcontrol so they really closely belong together.
  • Also the distance of the labels of these both should be closer. "Sensu" is not in the middle of the follwoing text field but more in the upper part. Therefore there is much distance between "Sensu" and "Detail" though they belong together.
  • At the same time there is very little distance between the first "Detail" and Misapplication Type though these do not belong together. WIth the later field the relationship part starts. If possible we should have some extra distance between these 2 controls. This way the UI may make clear what is taxon related and what is relationship related

#4 Updated by Andreas Müller 9 months ago

  • Status changed from Resolved to Feedback
  • Assignee changed from Andreas Müller to Katja Luther

#5 Updated by Andreas Müller 9 months ago

  • % Done changed from 0 to 70

#6 Updated by Katja Luther 9 months ago

#7 Updated by Katja Luther 9 months ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to Closed

created new ticket for the layout issues (#8649) and close this ticket

#8 Updated by Katja Luther 9 months ago

  • % Done changed from 70 to 100

Also available in: Atom PDF

Add picture from clipboard (Maximum size: 40 MB)