Project

General

Profile

bug #8340

is accepted for Footnotes missing and with wrong index

Added by Andreas Kohlbecker about 1 year ago. Updated about 1 year ago.

Status:
New
Priority:
New
Category:
cdm-dataportal
Target version:
Start date:
06/26/2019
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Severity:
normal
Found in Version:

Description

The option "Display is accepted for ... on taxon pages when coming from a synonym link." needs to be turned on for this (Layout>Taxon>Synonymy)

To reproduce:

  • Use the chichorieae data base
  • Add a footnote to Hypochaeris foliosa Vill. which is a herterotypic synonym to Hypochaeris uniflora

http://edit.test/d7/cichorieae/cdm_dataportal/taxon/e2b2af79-21bc-4a49-98d8-3b716ca26e9b/synonymy?highlite=c661ae18-da75-48c1-bd0d-8955ad2e4b8b&acceptedFor=c661ae18-da75-48c1-bd0d-8955ad2e4b8b#c661ae18-da75-48c1-bd0d-8955ad2e4b8b

This results in the footnote key being shown but the footnote text is missing.

Also the order of the footnotes is not correct here. Since the "is accepted for" page element comes after the synonymy the footnote key should have a value which is higher by 1 than the last footnote key in the synonymy.

picture823-1.png View (88 KB) Andreas Kohlbecker, 07/16/2019 05:23 PM


Related issues

Related to Edit - feature request #8339: Completely remove the potentially redundant 'acceptedFor' parameter from synonym page New 06/25/2019

History

#1 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 1 year ago

  • Description updated (diff)

#2 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 1 year ago

  • Related to feature request #8339: Completely remove the potentially redundant 'acceptedFor' parameter from synonym page added

#3 Updated by Andreas Müller about 1 year ago

I do not really understand the problem. On http://test.e-taxonomy.eu/dataportal/preview/cichorieae/cdm_dataportal/taxon/e2b2af79-21bc-4a49-98d8-3b716ca26e9b/synonymy?highlite=c661ae18-da75-48c1-bd0d-8955ad2e4b8b&acceptedFor=c661ae18-da75-48c1-bd0d-8955ad2e4b8b#c661ae18-da75-48c1-bd0d-8955ad2e4b8b (I use the test server as the above link seems to be a local DB) everything seems to be ok.
What do we need "is accepted for" at all?

#4 Updated by Andreas Müller about 1 year ago

  • Description updated (diff)

#5 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 1 year ago

Andreas Müller wrote:

I do not really understand the problem. On http://test.e-taxonomy.eu/dataportal/preview/cichorieae/cdm_dataportal/taxon/e2b2af79-21bc-4a49-98d8-3b716ca26e9b/synonymy?highlite=c661ae18-da75-48c1-bd0d-8955ad2e4b8b&acceptedFor=c661ae18-da75-48c1-bd0d-8955ad2e4b8b#c661ae18-da75-48c1-bd0d-8955ad2e4b8b (I use the test server as the above link seems to be a local DB) everything seems to be ok.

You need to turn the "is accepted for" as described in the description.

Then the problem becomes obvious:

What do we need "is accepted for" at all?

For the discussion related to this question i created a new ticket: #8339

#6 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 1 year ago

  • Status changed from New to Feedback
  • Assignee changed from Andreas Kohlbecker to Andreas Müller

#7 Updated by Andreas Müller about 1 year ago

  • Assignee changed from Andreas Müller to Andreas Kohlbecker

Don't know what kind of feedback is needed from my side?

#8 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 1 year ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to New

I think there is nothing to do about this ticket as long #8339 is not decided by 100%.

Also available in: Atom PDF

Add picture from clipboard (Maximum size: 40 MB)