EDIT

Follow up to ticket bug #8231

https://www.phycobank.org/cdm_dataportal/name/39908030-32e3-400c-b6c0-91aeda1e810a/null/null/
Eunotia krammeri
Eunotia krammeri Kulikovskiy, Lange-Bert., Genkal & Witkowski in Polish Bot. J. 55(1): 102, 103, pl. 7, fig. 1-19. 2010
is replaced synonym for Eunotia kurtkrammeri Kulikovskiy, Lange-Bert., Genkal & Witkowski,
Taxa for this name:
Eunotia krammeri Metzeltin & Lange-Bert. in Iconogr. Diatomol. 5: 64. 1998

The problem: Eunotia krammeri exists two times as name, one time as taxon (IAPT import)
The name Eunotia krammeri Kulikovskiy et al. 2010, nom. illeg. was replaced by Eunotia kurtkrammeri Kulikovskiy et al. 2012?
The taxon of name Eunotia krammeri Metzeltin & Lange-Bert. 1998 is linked. Why? A misuse of CDM or a link by the name string excluding the authors.

To make clear that
Eunotia krammeri Kulikovskiy, Lange-Bert., Genkal & Witkowski in Polish Bot. J. 55(1): 102, 103, pl. 7, fig. 1-19. 2010
is illegitimate, I tried to put in "nom. illeg." with the respective reason.
Unlocking the published registration did not allow to insert a status and status statement.
Switching to "curation" allow to insert a status and status statement and save it.
The Registration was set to the new date :( but the new status was not shown in the protal.
see: Registration Id: http://phycobank.org/101370

We should discuss if this is a single case or an issue.