Project

General

Profile

Actions

feature request #8178

closed

Auto-create absence/presence character for every structure

Added by Patrick Plitzner over 4 years ago. Updated over 4 years ago.

Status:
Rejected
Priority:
New
Assignee:
Patrick Plitzner
Category:
taxeditor
Target version:
-
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Severity:
normal
Tags:

Description

Presence/Absence Property (PA)

  • Jede Strukture muss in Kombination mit PA-Property einen Character bilden.
  • Beim Erzeugen des ersten Character mit einer neuen Struktur wird automatisch der PA-Character dieser Struktur zusätzlich erzeugt.
  • Dadurch wird der Character-Tree hierarchisch: Jeder PA-Character ist ein Knoten im Baum, die direkten Kinder sind dann Character, die die Struktur des PA-Characters haben.

Related issues

Has duplicate EDIT - feature request #8033: Add/Enable absent/present state for every characterDuplicatePatrick Plitzner

Actions
Blocked by EDIT - feature request #8180: Add property term "Presence/Absence" to CDM default termsClosedAndreas Müller

Actions
Actions #1

Updated by Patrick Plitzner over 4 years ago

  • Target version changed from Unassigned CDM tickets to Release 5.6
Actions #2

Updated by Patrick Plitzner over 4 years ago

Actions #3

Updated by Patrick Plitzner over 4 years ago

Actions #4

Updated by Patrick Plitzner over 4 years ago

  • Target version changed from Release 5.6 to Release 5.7

still experimental feature which will be fully implemented in next release

Actions #5

Updated by Patrick Plitzner over 4 years ago

  • Target version changed from Release 5.7 to Release 5.8
Actions #6

Updated by Andreas Müller over 4 years ago

  • Target version changed from Release 5.8 to Release 5.10
Actions #7

Updated by Patrick Plitzner over 4 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Rejected
  • Target version deleted (Release 5.10)

Rejecting ticket -> It does not always make sense to auto-create the "presence" character e.g. "Tepal Tip" is a structure that is always present if the tepal is present thus "tepal tip presence" would not make sense as a character.

Decision from https://wiki.bgbm.org/additivity/index.php/Additivity_62

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF