feature request #7947
closedregistration page shows name relations
100%
Description
Display of name relations in the reference page is urgently required
Related issues
Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 5 years ago
- Status changed from New to Feedback
- Assignee changed from Andreas Kohlbecker to Wolf-Henning Kusber
this has already been implemented. Are there any issues with the implementations any registrations for which the name relations are not shown?
Updated by Wolf-Henning Kusber about 5 years ago
- Assignee changed from Wolf-Henning Kusber to Andreas Kohlbecker
Check in production and test portal, please try these examples. There is no taxonomic relation entered.
IAPT-data:
Example: Phacus smulkowskianus(Zakryś) Kusber
Vaadin shows Basionym: Euglena smulkowskiana Zakryś, this is missing in Portal even though it is part of the registration.
PhycoBank Neudaten:
Halamphora semperpalorum (Wachn. & E.E.Gaiser) Rimet & R.Jahn
Vaadin shows Basionym: Amphora semperpalorum Wachn. & E.E.Gaiser
Hint: there is no blocking registration shown for Amphora semperpalorum.
Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 5 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Resolved
- Assignee changed from Andreas Kohlbecker to Wolf-Henning Kusber
- % Done changed from 0 to 50
Wolf-Henning Kusber wrote:
Check in production and test portal, please try these examples. There is no taxonomic relation entered.
IAPT-data:
Example: Phacus smulkowskianus(Zakryś) Kusber
Vaadin shows Basionym: Euglena smulkowskiana Zakryś, this is missing in Portal even though it is part of the registration.PhycoBank Neudaten:
Halamphora semperpalorum (Wachn. & E.E.Gaiser) Rimet & R.Jahn
Vaadin shows Basionym: Amphora semperpalorum Wachn. & E.E.Gaiser
Hint: there is no blocking registration shown for Amphora semperpalorum.
You can not yet test this feature on the production server since the release 5.5 i not out yet. So I only took a look at edit-test:
- Halamphora semperpalorum: the name has a basionym relationship to Amphora semperpalorum which is visible in the dataportal - This is OK
- the blocking registration is missing because blocking registrations where not created when the name relationship has been created.
- Phacus smulkowskianus(Zakryś) Kusber shows Euglena smulkowskiana Zakryś, in the portal - OK
I guess the basionym relation was hidden via the dataportal settings when you did the review.
The better formatting of the relations should be handled in a new ticket : #7975
I think we can close this ticket now, do you agree?
Updated by Wolf-Henning Kusber about 5 years ago
- Status changed from Resolved to Closed
- Assignee changed from Wolf-Henning Kusber to Andreas Kohlbecker
- % Done changed from 50 to 100
with respect to the open ticket #7975, we can close the current one.
Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 5 years ago
- Related to feature request #8048: Selenium test for Registration page added