Project

General

Profile

task #7935

Discuss new solution to establish the communication between submitter and curator

Added by Andreas Kohlbecker 3 months ago. Updated about 1 month ago.

Status:
In Progress
Priority:
Highest
Category:
cdm-vaadin
Target version:
Start date:
11/14/2018
Due date:
% Done:

10%

Severity:
normal
Tags:

Description

As stated in #7785 the checking for messaged in the Redmine instance serving as communication hub slows down the display of registration working sets a lot (43%)

--> decide for another solution to establish the communication between submitter and curator

The concept of using redmine as communication and messaging hub has been discussed during the last playday session. Result of this discussion was that this concept is not fulfilling the requirements. We should expect a lot of direct communication between submitter and curation which will often pass by any messaging system/hub. Therefor it might not make much sense to have such hub for controlled communication.


Related issues

Related to Edit - bug #7936: Consider complete removal of redmine communication hub code New 02/06/2019
Related to Edit - bug #8069: RegistrationUI: remove all messaging related code and message indicators from all views Closed 02/06/2019
Related to Edit - task #7269: Use redmine as message hub for submitter curator communication Resolved 02/20/2018
Copied from Edit - bug #7908: Redmine communication hub slows down RegistrationWorkingSets Closed 11/14/2018

History

#1 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker 3 months ago

  • Copied from bug #7908: Redmine communication hub slows down RegistrationWorkingSets added

#2 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker 3 months ago

  • Description updated (diff)

#3 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker 3 months ago

  • Related to bug #7936: Consider complete removal of redmine communication hub code added

#4 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker 3 months ago

[Henning]

Normaler Weise würde man auf normalen E-Mail-Kontakt ausweichen und eine Funktions-Email einrichten, z.B. phycobankcuration@bgbm.org, allerdings werden zurzeit von der Zedat Funktionsmails auf den Prüfstand gestellt, um den Bestand drastisch zu senken...

#5 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker 3 months ago

curation@phycobank.org wäre noch besser

#6 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker 3 months ago

  • Priority changed from New to Highest
  • Target version set to Release 5.5
  • % Done changed from 0 to 10

We agreed on a pure email solution without any messaging system:

curation@phycobank.org sollte auf eine bgbm interne Adresse verweisen: curation.phycobank@bgbm.org

#7 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker 3 months ago

  • Status changed from New to In Progress

#8 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker 3 months ago

  • Target version changed from Release 5.5 to Release 5.6

#9 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 1 month ago

  • Related to bug #8069: RegistrationUI: remove all messaging related code and message indicators from all views added

#10 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 1 month ago

  • Subject changed from Discussion new solution to establish the communication between submitter and curator to Discuss new solution to establish the communication between submitter and curator

#11 Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 1 month ago

  • Related to task #7269: Use redmine as message hub for submitter curator communication added

Also available in: Atom PDF

Add picture from clipboard (Maximum size: 40 MB)