bug #7766
closed
Remaining issues for using relationship DTO webservice in portal
Added by Andreas Kohlbecker over 5 years ago.
Updated about 4 years ago.
Description
for details see #7658
- taxonrelation footnotes missing (see #7658#note-51 for details)
- sort order of the relations (see #7658#note-46 for details) The expected sort order is:
- pro parte/partial synonyms,
- then invalid designations,
- then MANs
- followed (or including?) pro parte/partial MAN
- and finally concept relationships.
- links to related taxa (new) - before the refactoring the related concepts were linked, at least for real concept relationships we should again do this, needs discussion if we also want this for ppSyns, MANs, and inval desigs. (maybe configurable?)
- related issue for formatting MAN search results: #7771
- identifier links missing when footnote is created in MANs code part: #7778
- Subject changed from taxonrelation footnotes missing after using relationship DTO webservice in portal to Remaining issues for using relationship DTO webservice in portal
- Description updated (diff)
- Description updated (diff)
- Related to feature request #7771: Format Misapplication search results as MAN, not as accepted taxa added
- Description updated (diff)
- Copied to bug #7778: identifier links missing in taxon relations footnotes added
- Description updated (diff)
- Description updated (diff)
- Status changed from Feedback to Closed
this issue seems complete, since #7771 is in it's own ticket.
- Status changed from Closed to Resolved
- Assignee changed from Andreas Kohlbecker to Andreas Müller
- % Done changed from 0 to 90
- Description updated (diff)
- Status changed from Resolved to In Progress
- Assignee changed from Andreas Müller to Andreas Kohlbecker
- % Done changed from 90 to 70
The sort order seem to have problems. Is this an regression or has this point be missed?
- Target version changed from Release 5.4 to Release 5.11
- Target version changed from Release 5.11 to Release 5.12
- Target version changed from Release 5.12 to Release 5.13
- Status changed from In Progress to Closed
- % Done changed from 70 to 100
Andreas Kohlbecker wrote:
The sort order seem to have problems. Is this an regression or has this point be missed?
The sort order is fixed now. The correctness is approved by the test which has been adapted to meet the requirements from the ticket description.
Also available in: Atom
PDF