Project

General

Profile

Actions

bug #7447

open

ERS: Fix misapplied name issues for E+M common names.

Added by Andreas Müller almost 6 years ago. Updated almost 5 years ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Priority11
Category:
data
Target version:
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

90%

Estimated time:
0:30 h
Severity:
normal
Found in Version:
Tags:

Description

Fix misapplied name issues for E+M common names.

There are 2 issues:

  1. BerlinModelCommonNamesImport:341 - Misapplied name for common name was not found related to the accepted taxon. Created new relationship. CommonNameId: xxxx
  2. BerlinModelCommonNamesImport:316 - MisappliedName not found for misappliedTaxonId 415470; commonNameId: 44
  3. ~Also attaching the cn to both taxa and source handling does not yet fully work and should be fixed within this ticket.~ => I did not find a problem here, I checked for 2 records, in both cases 2 common names were created with sources attached and correct nameInSource, so this seems to be fxied

===

For 1 only the relation between the misapplied name and the accepted taxon does not exist. It is unclear why because they in generell seem to exist but are not found by the algorithm which looks into the set of existing misapplied names and tests if the expected misName is contained.

SELECT n.nameId, accn.NameCache acc, n.FullNameCache sourceName, cn.MisNameRefFk misRef, misRef.RefCache,
   pt_n.RIdentifier, pt_n.PTNameFk, pt_n.PTRefFk,  
   cn.*
FROM emCommonName cn 
  LEFT OUTER JOIN Name accn ON accn.nameId = cn.PTNameFk
  LEFT OUTER JOIN Name n ON n.nameId = cn.NameInSourceFk
  LEFT OUTER JOIN Reference misRef ON misRef.RefId = cn.MisNameRefFk
  LEFT OUTER JOIN PTaxon pt_n ON cn.NameInSourceFk = pt_n.PTNameFk AND cn.MisNameRefFk = pt_n.PTRefFk
WHERE CommonNameId IN (
2280,5358,7869,8056,8057,8230,8237,8238,8287,8304,8310,8354,8372,8396,8410,8473,8506,8536,8543,8550,
8789,8859,8860,9118,9126,9191,9470,9499,9523,9541,9610,9816,9865,9914,10051,10075,10081,10090,10094,
10785,10925,11968,12003,12130,12150,12184,12280,12331,12396,12445,12446,12447,12453,12469,12492,
12495,12498,12506,12510,12514,12658,13041,13325,13404,13406,13556,13667,13721,14122,14175,14655,
17314,17315,17317,17320,17380,17427,17428,17432,17562,17585,17630,137620,141872,142653,142957,143006,
143018,143064,143072,143301,143809,144062,144975,145189,145295,145319,145327,146211,146539,146981,148786,148802,
149389,149662,149774,149808,150389,150751,150831,150841,150959,150996,151006)
ORDER BY cn.CommonNameId, pt_n.RIdentifier

For 2 the relation ship realy does not exist. Need to ask ERS if we shouldn't add it.

SELECT accn.NameCache acc, cn.PTRefFk, n.nameId misNameId, n.FullNameCache misappliedName, cn.MisNameRefFk misRef, misRef.RefCache,
   pt_n.RIdentifier, pt_n.PTNameFk, pt_n.PTRefFk,  
   cn.*
FROM emCommonName cn 
  LEFT OUTER JOIN Name accn ON accn.nameId = cn.PTNameFk
  LEFT OUTER JOIN Name n ON n.nameId = cn.NameInSourceFk
  LEFT OUTER JOIN Reference misRef ON misRef.RefId = cn.MisNameRefFk
  LEFT OUTER JOIN PTaxon pt_n ON cn.NameInSourceFk = pt_n.PTNameFk AND cn.MisNameRefFk = pt_n.PTRefFk
WHERE CommonNameId IN (
44,9861,9882,12178,17318,17327,17446,17447,151113)
ORDER BY CommonNameId, pt_n.RIdentifier;

SELECT *
FROM PTaxon pt
WHERE pt.RIdentifier IN (415470);

SELECT *
FROM RelPTaxon rel
WHERE rel.PTNameFk1 = 7521920 AND rel.PTRefFk1 = 6593;

Related issues

Related to EDIT - task #7341: [Check] CommonName import issuesResolvedAndreas Müller

Actions
Actions #1

Updated by Andreas Müller almost 6 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)
Actions #2

Updated by Andreas Müller almost 6 years ago

  • Subject changed from E+M: fix to E+M: Fix misapplied name issues for E+M common names.
  • Description updated (diff)
Actions #3

Updated by Andreas Müller almost 6 years ago

  • Related to task #7341: [Check] CommonName import issues added
Actions #4

Updated by Andreas Müller almost 6 years ago

  • Estimated time changed from 4:00 h to 2:00 h
Actions #5

Updated by Andreas Müller almost 6 years ago

  • % Done changed from 0 to 30
Actions #6

Updated by Andreas Müller almost 6 years ago

  • Priority changed from New to Highest
Actions #7

Updated by Andreas Müller almost 6 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)
  • Status changed from New to In Progress
Actions #8

Updated by Andreas Müller almost 6 years ago

es gibt einige wenige Common Names, die im Zusammenhang mit einem Misapplied Name genannt werden, bei dem aber der Bezug des Misapplied Names zu dem akzeptierten Taxon fehlt.

Wenn der MAN in der Common Name Referenz vorkommt müsste es ja eigentlich auch Misapplied Name für das akzeptierte Taxon sensu dieser Referenz sein, oder?
Können wir in den 8 Fällen (1 Duplikat) die Misapplied Name Referenz hinzufügen?

Actions #9

Updated by Andreas Müller almost 6 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)
Actions #10

Updated by Andreas Müller over 5 years ago

  • Target version changed from Euro+Med Portal Release to Euro+Med Migration
  • % Done changed from 30 to 70
Actions #11

Updated by Andreas Müller over 5 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)
  • % Done changed from 70 to 80
Actions #12

Updated by Andreas Müller over 5 years ago

  • % Done changed from 80 to 90
  • Estimated time changed from 2:00 h to 0:30 h

AM:

...

Lediglich für den letzten Fall „Hieracium glaucinum subsp. glaucinum“ bräuchte ich noch Feedback von dir, wie hier das Zusammenspiel von Autonym, Spezies und Misapplikation wirklich sein soll.

Actions #13

Updated by Andreas Müller over 5 years ago

  • Subject changed from E+M: Fix misapplied name issues for E+M common names. to ERS: Fix misapplied name issues for E+M common names.
  • Priority changed from Highest to Priority11
Actions #14

Updated by Andreas Müller almost 5 years ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF