feature request #7419
closed
Provide example NormalImplicit import file for phycobank higher taxon graph imports
Added by Andreas Kohlbecker almost 6 years ago.
Updated over 5 years ago.
Description
The higher taxon graph as discussed in #6173 will be imported via spreadsheets whereas we will use the normal implicit import format.
The schema of the import will express the classification implicitly. Provide an example spreadsheet to henning on base of the file attached.
- Related to task #6173: Concept for a useful algae registry taxon classification added
- Blocks task #7420: Import for higher taxon graph for phycobank added
- Target version changed from Unassigned CDM tickets to Release 5.1
- Target version changed from Release 5.1 to Release 5.2
- Description updated (diff)
- Tracker changed from bug to feature request
- Status changed from New to Resolved
- Assignee changed from Andreas Müller to Andreas Kohlbecker
As we have decided on the format and an example file exists as attachement to #7420 I think we can close this ticket.
- Status changed from Resolved to Feedback
- Assignee changed from Andreas Kohlbecker to Wolf-Henning Kusber
- Target version changed from Release 5.2 to Release 5.3
There seems to be an open issue: As we decided to create a classification for each reference and create a new taxon per name and reference/classification we need the information which classification/reference a row in the Excel sheet belongs to.
There are 2 possibilities to solve this.
- use a single excel sheet per classification
- add a column for classification/reference to the excel sheet.
Please decide which solution you prefer.
- Target version deleted (
Release 5.3)
prefered: use a single excel sheet per classification
- Status changed from Feedback to Resolved
- Assignee changed from Wolf-Henning Kusber to Andreas Kohlbecker
Wolf-Henning Kusber wrote:
prefered: use a single excel sheet per classification
great, makes it easier
- % Done changed from 0 to 50
- Assignee changed from Andreas Kohlbecker to Wolf-Henning Kusber
Why did you pass this issue to me? From reading the comments I got the impression that this issue is completed. I think the both of you, Andreas & Henning, have deeper insight into the progress of this, so that you can decide if this issue is done or not better that I can.
- Status changed from Resolved to Closed
- % Done changed from 50 to 100
I think we can close this ticket.
Also available in: Atom
PDF