Project

General

Profile

Actions

feature request #6712

open

[DISCUSS] Should we remove anamorph from TaxonName (Fungi)

Added by Andreas Müller over 4 years ago. Updated over 1 year ago.

Status:
New
Priority:
New
Category:
cdm
Target version:
Start date:
06/09/2017
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Severity:
normal

Description

According to Melbourne Code anamorph should not be used anymore, or do we need it for older data.

"One fungus, one name" and "one fossil, one name" are important changes for fungi and for fossils; the concepts of anamorph and teleomorph (for fungi) as well as morphotaxa (for fossils) have been eliminated.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Code_of_Nomenclature_for_algae,_fungi,_and_plants


Related issues

Related to Edit - bug #6297: [Overview] BGBM User group wishes 2017NewAndreas Müller05/29/2017

Actions
Actions #1

Updated by Andreas Müller over 4 years ago

  • Related to bug #6297: [Overview] BGBM User group wishes 2017 added
Actions #2

Updated by Andreas Müller over 3 years ago

  • Target version changed from CDM UML 5.0 to CDM UML 5.5
Actions #3

Updated by Andreas Müller over 2 years ago

  • Target version changed from CDM UML 5.5 to CDM UML 5.15
Actions #4

Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago

  • Target version changed from CDM UML 5.15 to CDM UML 5.29
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF