Project

General

Profile

feature request #6712

[DISCUSS] Should we remove anamorph from TaxonName (Fungi)

Added by Andreas Müller almost 2 years ago. Updated 11 months ago.

Status:
New
Priority:
New
Category:
cdm
Target version:
Start date:
06/09/2017
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Severity:
normal

Description

According to Melbourne Code anamorph should not be used anymore, or do we need it for older data.

"One fungus, one name" and "one fossil, one name" are important changes for fungi and for fossils; the concepts of anamorph and teleomorph (for fungi) as well as morphotaxa (for fossils) have been eliminated.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Code_of_Nomenclature_for_algae,_fungi,_and_plants


Related issues

Related to Edit - bug #6297: [Overview] BGBM User group wishes 2017 New 05/29/2017

History

#1 Updated by Andreas Müller almost 2 years ago

  • Related to bug #6297: [Overview] BGBM User group wishes 2017 added

#2 Updated by Andreas Müller 11 months ago

  • Target version changed from CDM UML 5.0 to CDM UML 5.5

Also available in: Atom PDF

Add picture from clipboard (Maximum size: 40 MB)