Actions
feature request #6712
open[DISCUSS] Should we remove anamorph from TaxonName (Fungi)
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:
0%
Estimated time:
Severity:
normal
Description
According to Melbourne Code anamorph should not be used anymore, or do we need it for older data.
"One fungus, one name" and "one fossil, one name" are important changes for fungi and for fossils; the concepts of anamorph and teleomorph (for fungi) as well as morphotaxa (for fossils) have been eliminated.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Code_of_Nomenclature_for_algae,_fungi,_and_plants
Related issues
Updated by Andreas Müller almost 7 years ago
- Related to bug #6297: [Overview] BGBM User group wishes 2017 added
Updated by Andreas Müller almost 6 years ago
- Target version changed from CDM UML 5.0 to CDM UML 5.5
Updated by Andreas Müller almost 5 years ago
- Target version changed from CDM UML 5.5 to CDM UML 5.15
Updated by Andreas Müller almost 4 years ago
- Target version changed from CDM UML 5.15 to CDM UML 5.43
Actions