Actions
task #6610
closedThe according pyhcobcankID should be used as nameInSourceID for each name registered
Status:
Rejected
Priority:
New
Assignee:
Category:
Model
Target version:
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:
0%
Estimated time:
Related issues
Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 6 years ago
- Category set to Model
- Assignee set to Andreas Kohlbecker
- Target version set to Registry prototype available
- Parent task deleted (
#6592)
Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 6 years ago
- Subject changed from use according pyhcobcankID should be used as nameInSourceID for each name registered to The according pyhcobcankID should be used as nameInSourceID for each name registered
Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 6 years ago
I guess this idea of using the pyhcobcankID should be used as nameInSourceID is wrong. The nameInSourceID should be the identifier for a name. The phycobankID however is an identifier for the nomenclatural act not for the name. The only option to reuse it as identifier for name name is to append /name
to it:
http://phycobank.org/1298390/name
see #6592
Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 6 years ago
- Related to task #6944: Scheme for persistent name identifiers added
Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 4 years ago
- Status changed from New to Rejected
Actions