bug #6136
feature request #6041: Change the label of "Set as basionym of homotypical group"
Implement type providing name in homotypical group
0%
Description
For discussion see #6041.
Still need to decide if this is really the best solution.
Ask Greuther.
Is there always only 1 type providing name? What about multiple syntypes, illegal names with different types, etc.
What is the exact meaning? Currently we say it is "the oldest legal name in the group.
Related issues
History
#1 Updated by Andreas Müller over 4 years ago
- Blocks feature request #6041: Change the label of "Set as basionym of homotypical group" added
#2 Updated by Andreas Müller over 4 years ago
- Parent task set to #6041
#3 Updated by Andreas Müller over 4 years ago
- Target version changed from CDM UML 4.1 to Release 4.6
#4 Updated by Andreas Müller over 4 years ago
- Target version changed from Release 4.6 to CDM UML 4.7
#5 Updated by Andreas Müller about 4 years ago
AM: In anderem Zusammenhang habe ich dich so verstanden, dass es pro homotypische Gruppe immer nur einen type providing name geben darf/sollte":
NK: Eigentlich ja, im vorliegenden Fall ist es nur so, dass Crepis gracilis und Crepis atripappa durch identische Lectotypisierung erst homotypisch gemacht wurden. Wie stellt man das jetzt dar? Liefert C. atrripappa dann nun den Typus für C. gracilis (oder umgekehrt?), oder gibt es zwei type providing names mit demselben Typus?? Es gibt Fälle, in denen 2 Namen nachträglich homotypisch werden und jeder war vorher Basionym für mehrere Kombinationen. In solchen Fällen ist es darstellungstechnisch wahrscheinlich sinnvolller zwei getrennte homotypische Blöcke zu bauen und beiden eben denselben Typus zuzuweisen ...
#6 Updated by Andreas Müller about 4 years ago
- Related to feature request #6187: [DISCUSS] Ask W.Greuter about "type providing name" added
#7 Updated by Andreas Müller about 4 years ago
- Related to deleted (feature request #6187: [DISCUSS] Ask W.Greuter about "type providing name")
#8 Updated by Andreas Müller about 4 years ago
- Blocked by feature request #6187: [DISCUSS] Ask W.Greuter about "type providing name" added
#9 Updated by Andreas Müller almost 4 years ago
- Priority changed from Highest to Priority14
#10 Updated by Andreas Müller almost 4 years ago
- Target version changed from CDM UML 4.7 to CDM UML 5.0
#11 Updated by Andreas Müller almost 3 years ago
- Target version changed from CDM UML 5.0 to CDM UML 5.5
#12 Updated by Andreas Müller over 2 years ago
- Priority changed from Priority14 to Priority13
#13 Updated by Andreas Müller almost 2 years ago
- Target version changed from CDM UML 5.5 to CDM UML 5.15
#14 Updated by Andreas Müller 10 months ago
- Target version changed from CDM UML 5.15 to CDM UML 5.22
