feature request #5640
[DISCUSS] Do we need a general "non" name relationship
Some name relationships do not really match the existing relationships.
E.g. “Andropogon wrightii” nom. nud. (non Andropogon wrightii Hack.) can probably not be handled with the current name relationships. Also the blocking name relationship needs to be discussed as we usually have only the original name, the replacement name and the blocking name. The blocked name usually does not exist as it is illegitimate and therefore never published. However we often want to show that the replacement name is a non-blocking name