Actions
feature request #5640
closed[DISCUSS] Do we need a general "non" name relationship
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:
0%
Estimated time:
Severity:
normal
Description
Some name relationships do not really match the existing relationships.
E.g. “Andropogon wrightii” nom. nud. (non Andropogon wrightii Hack.) can probably not be handled with the current name relationships. Also the blocking name relationship needs to be discussed as we usually have only the original name, the replacement name and the blocking name. The blocked name usually does not exist as it is illegitimate and therefore never published. However we often want to show that the replacement name is a non-blocking name
duplicates #5655
Related issues
Updated by Andreas Müller about 3 years ago
- Is duplicate of feature request #5655: [DISCUSS] Do we need further "non xxx" relations? added
Updated by Andreas Müller about 3 years ago
- Target version changed from Unassigned CDM tickets to Release 5.25
Updated by Andreas Müller about 3 years ago
- Related to feature request #9698: Make name relationship filter a DB preference added
Updated by Andreas Müller about 3 years ago
- Status changed from New to Duplicate
- Priority changed from New to Highest
Actions