Project

General

Profile

feature request #5640

[DISCUSS] Do we need a general "non" name relationship

Added by Andreas Müller over 5 years ago. Updated 3 months ago.

Status:
Duplicate
Priority:
Highest
Category:
cdm
Target version:
Start date:
04/19/2016
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Severity:
normal

Description

Some name relationships do not really match the existing relationships.

E.g. “Andropogon wrightii” nom. nud. (non Andropogon wrightii Hack.) can probably not be handled with the current name relationships. Also the blocking name relationship needs to be discussed as we usually have only the original name, the replacement name and the blocking name. The blocked name usually does not exist as it is illegitimate and therefore never published. However we often want to show that the replacement name is a non-blocking name

duplicates #5655


Related issues

Related to Edit - feature request #9698: Make name relationship filter a DB preference New 07/06/2021
Duplicates Edit - feature request #5655: [DISCUSS] Do we need further "non xxx" relations? Resolved 03/17/2016

Associated revisions

Revision c7c43b5b (diff)
Added by Andreas Müller 3 months ago

ref #5655, ref #5640 unspecific 'non' NameRelationshipType added

History

#1 Updated by Andreas Müller 4 months ago

  • Description updated (diff)

#2 Updated by Andreas Müller 4 months ago

#3 Updated by Andreas Müller 4 months ago

  • Target version changed from Unassigned CDM tickets to Release 5.25

#4 Updated by Andreas Müller 4 months ago

  • Private changed from Yes to No

#5 Updated by Andreas Müller 3 months ago

#6 Updated by Andreas Müller 3 months ago

  • Status changed from New to Duplicate
  • Priority changed from New to Highest

Also available in: Atom PDF

Add picture from clipboard (Maximum size: 40 MB)