feature request #4682
open
[DISCUSS] Do we need an explanation/reason field in RelationBase
Added by Andreas Müller about 9 years ago.
Updated about 2 years ago.
Description
Some relations such as TaxonRelations are opinion. We may want to have a field to verbally explain why an author thinks that this relation exists/is correct.
Needed e.g. by Moose #4670
Currently we use Annotations for this. But this may not be enough.
It needs to be discussed which RelationBase classes do need such a field.
see also #4681
- Subject changed from [DISCUSS] Do we need an explanation field in RelationBase to [DISCUSS] Do we need an explanation/reason field in RelationBase
- Target version deleted (
CDM UML 3.6)
- Target version changed from CDM UML 4.0 to CDM UML 4.1
- Priority changed from New to Priority14
- Description updated (diff)
- Target version changed from CDM UML 4.1 to CDM UML 4.7
- Target version changed from CDM UML 4.7 to CDM UML 5.0
- Target version changed from CDM UML 5.0 to CDM UML 5.5
- Priority changed from Priority14 to Priority13
- Target version changed from CDM UML 5.5 to CDM UML 5.15
- Target version changed from CDM UML 5.15 to CDM UML 5.43
- Due date set to 03/29/2022
- Priority changed from Priority13 to Highest
- Target version changed from CDM UML 5.43 to Release 5.31
- Start date set to 03/24/2022
- Estimated time set to 3:00 h
- Parent task set to #2934
- Severity changed from normal to major
Dicussion/implementation should be done in 5.31 to have it available for RL import in case we implement it.
- Private changed from Yes to No
- Description updated (diff)
- Target version changed from Release 5.31 to CDM UML - Next major release
- % Done changed from 0 to 10
- Parent task deleted (
#2934)
- Severity changed from major to normal
We will not implement this for "Moose" therefore remove it from parent and link it instead. Move to UML milestone
- Due date deleted (
03/29/2022)
- Start date deleted (
03/24/2022)
Also available in: Atom
PDF