https://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/https://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/redmine/favicon.ico?14691914852015-03-05T15:03:56ZEDIT Project ManagementEDIT - feature request #4682: [DISCUSS] Do we need an explanation/reason field in RelationBasehttps://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/4682?journal_id=189272015-03-05T15:03:56ZAndreas Müller
<ul><li><strong>Subject</strong> changed from <i>[DISCUSS] Do we need an explanation field in RelationBase</i> to <i>[DISCUSS] Do we need an explanation/reason field in RelationBase</i></li></ul> EDIT - feature request #4682: [DISCUSS] Do we need an explanation/reason field in RelationBasehttps://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/4682?journal_id=189282015-06-04T12:20:16ZAndreas Müller
<ul><li><strong>Target version</strong> deleted (<del><i>CDM UML 3.6</i></del>)</li></ul> EDIT - feature request #4682: [DISCUSS] Do we need an explanation/reason field in RelationBasehttps://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/4682?journal_id=189292016-05-02T13:45:23ZAndreas Müller
<ul><li><strong>Target version</strong> changed from <i>CDM UML 4.0</i> to <i>CDM UML 4.1</i></li></ul> EDIT - feature request #4682: [DISCUSS] Do we need an explanation/reason field in RelationBasehttps://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/4682?journal_id=189302016-07-08T18:53:07ZAndreas Müller
<ul><li><strong>Priority</strong> changed from <i>New</i> to <i>Priority14</i></li></ul> EDIT - feature request #4682: [DISCUSS] Do we need an explanation/reason field in RelationBasehttps://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/4682?journal_id=257362016-12-01T13:21:41ZAndreas Kohlbecker
<ul><li><strong>Description</strong> updated (<a title="View differences" href="/redmine/journals/25736/diff?detail_id=33746">diff</a>)</li></ul> EDIT - feature request #4682: [DISCUSS] Do we need an explanation/reason field in RelationBasehttps://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/4682?journal_id=257432016-12-01T13:21:58ZAndreas Kohlbecker
<ul><li><strong>Target version</strong> changed from <i>CDM UML 4.1</i> to <i>CDM UML 4.7</i></li></ul> EDIT - feature request #4682: [DISCUSS] Do we need an explanation/reason field in RelationBasehttps://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/4682?journal_id=296642017-06-06T23:23:33ZAndreas Müller
<ul><li><strong>Target version</strong> changed from <i>CDM UML 4.7</i> to <i>CDM UML 5.0</i></li></ul> EDIT - feature request #4682: [DISCUSS] Do we need an explanation/reason field in RelationBasehttps://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/4682?journal_id=365552018-05-14T11:55:38ZAndreas Müller
<ul><li><strong>Target version</strong> changed from <i>CDM UML 5.0</i> to <i>CDM UML 5.5</i></li></ul> EDIT - feature request #4682: [DISCUSS] Do we need an explanation/reason field in RelationBasehttps://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/4682?journal_id=430172019-01-18T23:34:27ZAndreas Müller
<ul><li><strong>Priority</strong> changed from <i>Priority14</i> to <i>Priority13</i></li></ul> EDIT - feature request #4682: [DISCUSS] Do we need an explanation/reason field in RelationBasehttps://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/4682?journal_id=463902019-05-05T09:19:34ZAndreas Müller
<ul><li><strong>Target version</strong> changed from <i>CDM UML 5.5</i> to <i>CDM UML 5.15</i></li></ul> EDIT - feature request #4682: [DISCUSS] Do we need an explanation/reason field in RelationBasehttps://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/4682?journal_id=542712020-06-23T12:53:03ZAndreas Müller
<ul><li><strong>Target version</strong> changed from <i>CDM UML 5.15</i> to <i>CDM UML 5.43</i></li></ul> EDIT - feature request #4682: [DISCUSS] Do we need an explanation/reason field in RelationBasehttps://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/4682?journal_id=652282022-03-11T17:23:59ZAndreas Müller
<ul><li><strong>Due date</strong> set to <i>03/29/2022</i></li><li><strong>Priority</strong> changed from <i>Priority13</i> to <i>Highest</i></li><li><strong>Target version</strong> changed from <i>CDM UML 5.43</i> to <i>Release 5.31</i></li><li><strong>Start date</strong> set to <i>03/24/2022</i></li><li><strong>Estimated time</strong> set to <i>3:00 h</i></li><li><strong>Parent task</strong> set to <i>#2934</i></li><li><strong>Severity</strong> changed from <i>normal</i> to <i>major</i></li></ul><p>Dicussion/implementation should be done in 5.31 to have it available for RL import in case we implement it.</p>
EDIT - feature request #4682: [DISCUSS] Do we need an explanation/reason field in RelationBasehttps://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/4682?journal_id=659102022-04-05T10:46:29ZAndreas Müller
<ul><li><strong>Private</strong> changed from <i>Yes</i> to <i>No</i></li></ul> EDIT - feature request #4682: [DISCUSS] Do we need an explanation/reason field in RelationBasehttps://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/4682?journal_id=659112022-04-05T10:46:45ZAndreas Müller
<ul><li><strong>Tags</strong> set to <i>redlist</i></li></ul> EDIT - feature request #4682: [DISCUSS] Do we need an explanation/reason field in RelationBasehttps://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/4682?journal_id=659202022-04-05T12:52:58ZAndreas Müller
<ul><li><strong>Description</strong> updated (<a title="View differences" href="/redmine/journals/65920/diff?detail_id=82602">diff</a>)</li></ul> EDIT - feature request #4682: [DISCUSS] Do we need an explanation/reason field in RelationBasehttps://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/4682?journal_id=659242022-04-05T16:16:29ZAndreas Müller
<ul><li><strong>Target version</strong> changed from <i>Release 5.31</i> to <i>CDM UML - Next major release</i></li><li><strong>% Done</strong> changed from <i>0</i> to <i>10</i></li><li><strong>Parent task</strong> deleted (<del><i>#2934</i></del>)</li><li><strong>Severity</strong> changed from <i>major</i> to <i>normal</i></li></ul><p>We will not implement this for "Moose" therefore remove it from parent and link it instead. Move to UML milestone</p>
EDIT - feature request #4682: [DISCUSS] Do we need an explanation/reason field in RelationBasehttps://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/4682?journal_id=659252022-04-05T16:16:38ZAndreas Müller
<ul><li><strong>Due date</strong> deleted (<del><i>03/29/2022</i></del>)</li><li><strong>Start date</strong> deleted (<del><i>03/24/2022</i></del>)</li></ul>