EDIT

Hi Franck,

i am about to figure out how the order of the map legend entries are defined and how it can be influenced in a reliable way wich works for all versions of the map service.

My first experiments with an example from http://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/trac/wiki/MapRestServiceExamples revealed that the order seems to be defined by the order of the as parameter entries:

http://edit.africamuseum.be/edit_wp5/v1/areas.php?l=tdwg1&legend=1&mlp=3&title=a:foreign|b:native|c:rare|d:unknown&ad=tdwg4:c:MXEDU|b:MXETA|tdwg3:a:MXC,CUB|b:MXE,MXG|c:MXS,MXT&as=a:329d2a,483eef,2,2_2|b:ab8dc9F,da1029,2,5_7|c:d2e347|d:f7555d&ms=500&bbox=-115,6.78,-75.19,29.8&recalculate=false

http://edit.africamuseum.be/edit_wp5/v1/areas.php?l=tdwg1&legend=1&mlp=3&title=a:foreign|b:native|c:rare|d:unknown&ad=tdwg4:c:MXEDU|b:MXETA|tdwg3:a:MXC,CUB|b:MXE,MXG|c:MXS,MXT&as=b:ab8dc9F,da1029,2,5_7|c:d2e347|a:329d2a,483eef,2,2_2|d:f7555d&ms=500&bbox=-115,6.78,-75.19,29.8&recalculate=false

(BTW: the above is not working with v1.4_dev !)

Then I tried a more realistic test:

http://edit.africamuseum.be/edit_wp5/v1.4_dev/rest_gen.php?&image=true&recalculate=false&ms=512,512&bbox=-52.208579,12.692779,84.447524,66.352633&l=background_gis:Y,euromed_2013:Z&title=b:native%2C++doubtfully+native|h:native|c:introduced|d:native%2C++presence+questionable|f:introduced%2C+adventitious+%28casual%29|g:introduced%2C+naturalized|e:present&ad=euromed_2013%3Aparent:h:It,Gg|d:Ca|euromed_2013%3Aemarea:h:Ge,Cs,Hs%28A%29,Ga%28C%29,Tu%28A%29,Uk%28K%29,Sk,La,Uk%28U%29,Hu,Rf%28NW%29,Ar,Au%28L%29,Si%28S%29,Rf%28E%29,Rf%28K%29,Bu,Gr,Ga%28F%29,Da,Rf%28CS%29,Ct,Cg,Rf%28N%29,Tu%28E%29,Rf%28C%29,Lt,Ab%28A%29,Sr,Hs%28S%29,Su,Be%28L%29,Au%28A%29,Si%28M%29,By,Es,Lu,He,Ho,BH,Sl,Rf%28S%29,Rm,Ab%28N%29,Mo,Be%28B%29,Sy,Po,Al,Mk,Ga%28M%29|b:Br|c:Hb%28E%29|e:Sa,Le|f:Hb%28N%29|g:Co&as=Z:ffffff,c8c8c8~|Y:e0faff~|b:00ff00~0.1,|g:c86400~0.1,|h:008000~0.1,|f:c8c800~0.1,|c:c89600~0.1,|d:00c8b4~0.1,|e:9cdf00~0.1,&legend=1

http://edit.africamuseum.be/edit_wp5/v1.4_dev/rest_gen.php?&image=true&recalculate=false&ms=512,512&bbox=-52.208579,12.692779,84.447524,66.352633&l=background_gis:Y,euromed_2013:Z&title=b:native%2C++doubtfully+native|h:native|c:introduced|d:native%2C++presence+questionable|f:introduced%2C+adventitious+%28casual%29|g:introduced%2C+naturalized|e:present&ad=euromed_2013%3Aparent:h:It,Gg|d:Ca|euromed_2013%3Aemarea:h:Ge,Cs,Hs%28A%29,Ga%28C%29,Tu%28A%29,Uk%28K%29,Sk,La,Uk%28U%29,Hu,Rf%28NW%29,Ar,Au%28L%29,Si%28S%29,Rf%28E%29,Rf%28K%29,Bu,Gr,Ga%28F%29,Da,Rf%28CS%29,Ct,Cg,Rf%28N%29,Tu%28E%29,Rf%28C%29,Lt,Ab%28A%29,Sr,Hs%28S%29,Su,Be%28L%29,Au%28A%29,Si%28M%29,By,Es,Lu,He,Ho,BH,Sl,Rf%28S%29,Rm,Ab%28N%29,Mo,Be%28B%29,Sy,Po,Al,Mk,Ga%28M%29|b:Br|c:Hb%28E%29|e:Sa,Le|f:Hb%28N%29|g:Co&as=Z:ffffff,c8c8c8~|Y:e0faff~|g:c86400~0.1,|h:008000~0.1,|f:c8c800~0.1,|c:c89600~0.1,|d:00c8b4~0.1,|e:9cdf00~0.1,|b:00ff00~0.1,&legend=1

This change however did not have any effect. I tried other approaches but I could not influence the order in any way.

Cheers

Andreas

Hi Andreas,

I think the order of map legend should be as you have described it, except:

PresenceTerm.INTRODUCED_NATURALIZED

PresenceTerm.INTRODUCED

PresenceTerm.INTRODUCED_ADVENTITIOUS

Eckhard

from email:

Hallo Eckhard,

die Reihenfolge in der Legende entspricht exakt der Priorität der Status, das ist aus zeitlichen Gründen derzeit nicht anders lösbar.

Mehr Flexibilität wäre wünschenswert, da gebe ich dir Recht, ist aber mit einigem Aufwand verbunden, und daher denke ich es ist besser ich kümmere mich um dringlichere Baustellen, wie die Bibliographie aka. Referenzen etc. ich denke das ist in eurem Sinne

Andreas

The subject of this ticket is that the order of map legend entries should conform to term order, this is solved! I will therefore open a new ticket for the freely configurable legend order: #4369 (order of map legend entries freely configurable)

Looks like fixed: order is ok, except what I wrote in this ticket before:

"I think the order of map legend should be as you have described it, except:

PresenceTerm.INTRODUCED_NATURALIZED PresenceTerm.INTRODUCED PresenceTerm.INTRODUCED_ADVENTITIOUS"

Example: http://test.e-taxonomy.eu/dataportal/preview/euromed/cdm_dataportal/taxon/f3397e54-17e0-4f97-b276-afdd54d8b047

The colour should get paler in the order, not becoming paler and then darker again.

However, I do not understand why some areas get the "present" status instead of the correct one. E.g., in Solidago candensis, the status for France is "present", whereas the status should in fact be "introduced: naturalised".

In Symphyotrichum squamatum,the status for Italy and Turkey is "present", but it should be "introduced: naturalised"

Andreas M., could you check the data? Something to do with the import or transmission engine?

Replying to e.raab-straube:

Looks like fixed: order is ok, except what I wrote in this ticket before:

"I think the order of map legend should be as you have described it, except:

PresenceTerm.INTRODUCED_NATURALIZED PresenceTerm.INTRODUCED PresenceTerm.INTRODUCED_ADVENTITIOUS"

Example:http://test.e-taxonomy.eu/dataportal/preview/euromed/cdm_dataportal/taxon/f3397e54-17e0-4f97-b276-afdd54d8b047

The colour should get paler in the order, not becoming paler and then darker again.

This seems to be a misconfiguration in the edit map server, I will create a new ticket in which we can examine this issue in depth ... #4818

Replying to a.kohlbecker:

Replying to e.raab-straube:

Looks like fixed: order is ok, except what I wrote in this ticket before:

"I think the order of map legend should be as you have described it, except:

PresenceTerm.INTRODUCED_NATURALIZED PresenceTerm.INTRODUCED PresenceTerm.INTRODUCED_ADVENTITIOUS"

Example:http://test.e-taxonomy.eu/dataportal/preview/euromed/cdm_dataportal/taxon/f3397e54-17e0-4f97-b276-afdd54d8b047

The colour should get paler in the order, not becoming paler and then darker again.

This seems to be a misconfiguration in the edit map server, I will create a new ticket in which we can examine this issue in depth ... #4818

I misunderstood this, the colors are correct but the order of the introduces status is not correct, it shoul dbe like:

• PresenceTerm.INTRODUCED_NATURALIZED

• PresenceTerm.INTRODUCED

• PresenceTerm.INTRODUCED_ADVENTITIOUS

This (http://euromed.luomus.fi/euromed_map.php?taxon=283364&size=medium) is the reference map for Symphyotrichum squamatum.

Andreas

i created a new ticket for the problem with the distribution status present : #4822

This is a minor issue, still not fixed. Can be postponed.

Priority increase to have a look to the ticket if time is left until version 1.0 of the portal

Create new ticket for remaining task