bug #3992
open
[CHECK] Use last scrutiny instead of sec reference
Added by Andreas Müller about 10 years ago.
Updated over 2 years ago.
Description
In E+M the last scrutiny field may better represent the meaning of the secundum reference than the PTRefFK field does. We may have to adapt E+M imports this way.
First discuss with Eckhard.
See also #3990
Hallo,
Ich erinnere mich, dass es einen wichtigen Grund gab, warum wir sec. Referenz und last scrutiny getrennt behandeln. Leider fällt mir dieser aber nicht mehr ein. Es müsste aber E-Mail Korrespondenz (zum Beispiel zwischen Walter und Eckhard) dazu geben.
Viele Grüße
Anton
- Keywords set to Euro+Med,Migration
- Description updated (diff)
- Priority changed from New to Highest
- Estimated time set to 4:00 h
- Related to task #7713: Atomize last scrutiny references added
- Status changed from New to In Progress
Last scrutiny is now imported as sec references for those taxa having a last scrutiny information. Otherwise PTaxon.ptRefFk is taken as before.
- Precedes feature request #5882: option (as new default) to show full citation of accepted name below taxon page title added
- Private changed from Yes to No
- Subject changed from Use last scrutiny instead of sec reference to [CHECK] Use last scrutiny instead of sec reference
- Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
Generally this worked. Special cases will be handled in separate tickets.
After import we will need to check all taxa having still a former sec reference as sec reference and see if these should be handled differently somehow.
- % Done changed from 0 to 80
Also available in: Atom
PDF