Project

General

Profile

Actions

feature request #3697

open

Distinguish display of fossil and "normal" occurrence records in specimen map

Added by Gabriele Dröge over 8 years ago. Updated almost 2 years ago.

Status:
New
Priority:
Priority11
Category:
cdm-dataportal
Start date:
09/04/2013
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Severity:
normal
Tags:

Description

Fossil records are telling a different story of distribution/occurrence of a taxon than classical occurrence records. Therefore they should be displayed in a different way in the specimen maps, otherwise a misinterpretation of the map is forseeable.

e.g. Cyanopica today only in Portugal/Spain and eastern Asia/China. Fossil records available for the whole area between Spain and China.

I suggest at least a different color/pattern for the fossil bubbles in the specimen map. In worst case different colors/patterns are required for different geological eras due to millions of years laying between them.

We should also think about creating a separate specimen map for the fossil records, maybe this is easier to implement and a different color/pattern could be avoided?

Since I am currently on the way to include a lot of fossil records to the Corvids portal I would appreciate a solution for this.


Related issues

Related to PhycoBank - bug #6069: DataPortal for Registry ClosedAndreas Kohlbecker12/13/2016

Actions
Related to Edit - feature request #4488: Specimen data points in map should show FieldUnit informationClosedAndreas Kohlbecker09/29/2016

Actions
Related to Edit - feature request #3363: dagger (Totenkreuz) after extinct and fossil taxaIn ProgressAndreas Müller03/24/2013

Actions
Related to Edit - feature request #6113: webservice to expose FieldUnits related to a Taxon or TaxonName as KML and/or GML ClosedAndreas Kohlbecker09/29/2016

Actions
Related to Edit - feature request #8307: display fossil in the context of the taxon nameNewAndreas Kohlbecker05/28/2019

Actions
Actions #1

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 8 years ago

  • Keywords set to map

I think we should allow differentiating between point representing observations, specimens and fossils.

We should also think about creating a separate specimen map for the fossil records, maybe this is easier to implement and a different color/pattern could be avoided?

How about different layers in the same map? This is much easier to achieve at the moment.

Actions #2

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 8 years ago

Replying to a.kohlbecker:

I think we should allow differentiating between point representing observations, specimens and fossils.

We should also think about creating a separate specimen map for the fossil records, maybe this is easier to implement and a different color/pattern could be avoided?

How about different layers in the same map? This is much easier to achieve at the moment.

I forgot something to add: color/pattern is also easy to achieve, since it is already supported by the map service

Actions #3

Updated by Gabriele Dröge over 8 years ago

Ok, then lets try different layers for the fossil/non-fossil problem please!

If different colors are easy to achieve I propose different colors for the specimen record aggregation problem. There is no specific ticket available yet, but see also ticket #3277.

Example suggestion: Specimen records for a species should aggregate all subspecies/varieties records (all levels below). Those subspecies records should be displayed with different colors. In case of genus level the different colors should be used for different species (but not grandchildren like subspecies).

This different colors feature would be perfect both for fossil and non-fossil specimen records and should be optional in general.

If you want to create a new ticket for this color feature please cc Norbert, Henning and Eckhard as well.

Actions #4

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker almost 7 years ago

  • Target version changed from cdm_dataportal RELEASE 3.5.0 to cdm_dataportal RELEASE 3.5.1

moving tickets to next milestone

Actions #5

Updated by Andreas Müller over 6 years ago

  • Target version deleted (cdm_dataportal RELEASE 3.5.1)

move open 3.5.1 tickets to next milestone after release

Actions #6

Updated by Andreas Müller over 6 years ago

  • Target version deleted ()
Actions #7

Updated by Andreas Müller over 6 years ago

  • Target version changed from cdm_dataportal RELEASE 3.8 to Reviewed Next Major Release
  • Priority changed from Priority12 to Priority14
Actions #8

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 5 years ago

  • Related to bug #6069: DataPortal for Registry added
Actions #9

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 5 years ago

Actions #10

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 5 years ago

Actions #11

Updated by Gabriele Dröge about 5 years ago

  • Tags changed from map to map, corvidae
  • Description updated (diff)
Actions #12

Updated by Andreas Müller almost 3 years ago

  • Priority changed from Priority14 to Priority11
Actions #13

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker almost 2 years ago

  • Related to feature request #6113: webservice to expose FieldUnits related to a Taxon or TaxonName as KML and/or GML added
Actions #14

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker almost 2 years ago

  • Private changed from Yes to No
Actions #15

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker 11 months ago

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF