Project

General

Profile

Actions

feature request #3312

closed

Add time period scope to DescriptionElementBase

Added by Patricia Kelbert about 11 years ago. Updated about 5 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Highest
Category:
cdm
Target version:
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Estimated time:
Severity:
normal

Description

Distribution data need to have the possibility to be linked with time period.

It's missing in the CDM.

It's needed for RedList and for proiBiosphere

see also #3746, #3747


Related issues

Related to EDIT - feature request #3746: Implement time period scope for description elements in TaxEditorClosedKatja Luther

Actions
Actions #1

Updated by Andreas Müller about 11 years ago

  • Category changed from cdmlib to cdm
  • Target version deleted (cdmlib - Next Major Release)
  • Priority changed from Priority08 to Priority14

Can you give more details? Examples? There are different types of time periods: seasonal or startEndYear (e.g. for fossils, we do have a requirement for this already), etc.

Actions #2

Updated by Patricia Kelbert about 11 years ago

Here what Quentin said in his email

"

One important feature is that distributions are not dated (except for the publication date of the linked reference). The only way we can record that a species was present on a particular date is by recording an observation. However, this is not really the most suitable data type for information taken from floras. Observations are also not suitable for absence data, but we will need to record when it was absent."

For example, you extract data from a flora (book). There can be information concerning the distribution at different time periods- for example: "until 1900 : unknown"; "from 1900 to 1920: present"; "from 1920 to 1960: absent"

I think startEndYear is the more appropriate.

Actions #3

Updated by Andreas Müller about 11 years ago

Replying to p.kelbert:

Here what Quentin said in his email

"

One important feature is that distributions are not dated (except for the publication date of the linked reference). The only way we can record that a species was present on a particular date is by recording an observation. However, this is not really the most suitable data type for information taken from floras. Observations are also not suitable for absence data, but we will need to record when it was absent."

For example, you extract data from a flora (book). There can be information concerning the distribution at different time periods- for example: "until 1900 : unknown"; "from 1900 to 1920: present"; "from 1920 to 1960: absent"

I think startEndYear is the more appropriate.

So this is more a temporal scope on the status rather then a scope on the area.

Generally we will need more generic scopes on DescriptionElementBase. At least a spatial and a temporal one.

Actions #4

Updated by Alexander Oppermann about 11 years ago

Replying to a.mueller:

Replying to p.kelbert:

Here what Quentin said in his email

"

One important feature is that distributions are not dated (except for the publication date of the linked reference). The only way we can record that a species was present on a particular date is by recording an observation. However, this is not really the most suitable data type for information taken from floras. Observations are also not suitable for absence data, but we will need to record when it was absent."

For example, you extract data from a flora (book). There can be information concerning the distribution at different time periods- for example: "until 1900 : unknown"; "from 1900 to 1920: present"; "from 1920 to 1960: absent"

I think startEndYear is the more appropriate.

So this is more a temporal scope on the status rather then a scope on the area.

Generally we will need more generic scopes on DescriptionElementBase. At least a spatial and a temporal one.

This is actually what we mean and need. The given example is not the limit, but rather a use case of many other. So it doesn't matter if the scope is bound to a status or an area.

Actions #5

Updated by Andreas Müller almost 11 years ago

  • Status changed from New to In Progress
  • Priority changed from Priority14 to Highest
Actions #6

Updated by Andreas Müller almost 11 years ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
  • Subject changed from Distribution needs time period to Add time period scope to DescriptionElementBase

changed title as the change needs to be more generic and will be applied to all description elements.

r18376

Actions #7

Updated by Andreas Müller over 10 years ago

  • Status changed from Resolved to Closed
  • Resolution set to fixed
  • % Done set to 100
Actions #8

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker over 7 years ago

  • Tags deleted (distribution, time)
  • Description updated (diff)
Actions #9

Updated by Andreas Müller over 6 years ago

  • Related to feature request #3746: Implement time period scope for description elements in TaxEditor added
Actions #10

Updated by Andreas Kohlbecker about 5 years ago

  • Private changed from Yes to No
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF