Project

General

Profile

Actions

bug #10501

closed

Numbering of footnotes sometimes not correct

Added by Katja Luther 2 months ago. Updated about 1 month ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Priority14
Assignee:
Category:
cdm-dataportal
Target version:
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Estimated time:
Severity:
normal
Found in Version:

Description

mail ERS:

ich habe mal zu einem Taxon mal ausführlich Gebrauch von Annotationen gemacht, und zwar sowohl zu Taxon- als auch zu Namens- und Faktendaten:

https://europlusmed.org/cdm_dataportal/taxon/c0bb1e1f-725e-407a-ba45-e7d33773a0af

Dabei kommen die Annotationen zu den Faktendaten als erste heraus (Nr. 1 und 2 zu den Verbreitungsdaten Algerien bzw. Tunesien), obwohl sie im Portal unten stehen.

Bei dem MA-Namen Sphaerocarpos texanus ist es eigentlich auch nicht logisch, dass „err. sec.-Referenz“ als Nr. 4 vor den beiden sensu-Referenzen Nr. 5 und 6 gelistet wird.


Related issues

Related to EDIT - bug #10502: Short citations of sensu references should be ordered chronologicallyClosedKatja Luther

Actions
Related to EDIT - bug #10517: Remaining issues on footnote order and formattingNewKatja Luther

Actions
Actions #1

Updated by Katja Luther 2 months ago

The numbering of footnotes comes from the order of processing the different elements. Maybe we have to think about to reorder after complete processing.

Actions #2

Updated by Katja Luther about 2 months ago

First step was moving processing of synonymy in not tabbed pages at the beginning, this results in starting the footnotes of synonymy with one.

Also the ordering of the MAN sources is done before creating the footnotes and the footnotes of sensu and err sec sources are numbered in the order of their appearance.

Actions #3

Updated by Andreas Müller about 2 months ago

  • Status changed from New to In Progress
  • Priority changed from New to Highest
Actions #4

Updated by Katja Luther about 2 months ago

  • % Done changed from 0 to 30

Now the footnotes for sensu references are correct and if synonymy and factual data are on one page, the footnotes are correctly ordered. Still problematic is the ordering if both exists in parallel footnotes for sensu/err sec refernces and annotations.

Actions #5

Updated by Andreas Müller about 1 month ago

  • Target version changed from Release 5.47 to Release 5.43
Actions #6

Updated by Andreas Müller about 1 month ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
  • % Done changed from 30 to 70

We need a follow up ticket.

Actions #7

Updated by Katja Luther about 1 month ago

  • Related to bug #10502: Short citations of sensu references should be ordered chronologically added
Actions #8

Updated by Katja Luther about 1 month ago

  • Related to bug #10517: Remaining issues on footnote order and formatting added
Actions #9

Updated by Andreas Müller about 1 month ago

  • Priority changed from Highest to Priority14
Actions #10

Updated by Katja Luther about 1 month ago

  • Status changed from Resolved to Closed

The follow up ticket is #10517, so we can close this ticket.

Actions #11

Updated by Katja Luther about 1 month ago

  • % Done changed from 70 to 100
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF