bug #10089
closedOrder TypeDesignationSetContainer by status type
80%
Description
Currently it is first ordered by base entity (e.g. field unit) alphabetically and only within TypeDesignationWorkingSet ordered by type status.
Files
Related issues
Updated by Andreas Müller almost 2 years ago
- Status changed from New to Resolved
- % Done changed from 0 to 70
Applied in changeset cdmlib|7af46cd80139907f3c80f4ee1ad644a0260c7b18.
Updated by Andreas Müller almost 2 years ago
- Subject changed from Order TypeDesignationWorkingSetManager by status type to Order TypeDesignationSetContainer by status type
Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago
- Priority changed from New to Priority14
Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago
- Assignee changed from Andreas Müller to Katja Luther
- % Done changed from 70 to 80
Asked WGB for testing (2022-08-02).
Katja, can you please review?
Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago
- Related to feature request #7696: use compact type representations in the synonymy as provided by the typedesignations/byTaxon/{taxon_uuid} service added
Updated by Andreas Müller over 1 year ago
Only implemented for cdmlight. Data portal does not use the TypeDesignationSetContainer yet.
Updated by Katja Luther over 1 year ago
- File types.png added
mail WB:
Hallo,
das Type Statement in der HomotypicGroup.csv muss ich für Publikationen umsortieren. Beispiel:
Achyranthes coynei Santapau in Kew Bull. 3: 488. 1948 ["1949"]. Sec. Santapau (1948)
Type: India, E. Blatter 27553 (paratype: BLAT); India, E. Blatter 27554 (paratype: BLAT); India, E. Blatter 27555 (isoparatype: BLAT); India, H. Santapau 5945 (paratype: BLAT); India, H. Santapau 5946 (paratype: BLAT); India, H. Santapau 5947 (paratype: BLAT); India, H. Santapau 8649 (paratype: BLAT); India, Khandala, Western Ghauts, 26 Nov 1945, H. Santapau 8071 (isotype: K K000848074); India, Khandala, Western Ghauts, 26 Nov 1945, H. Santapau 8072 (isotype: A A00036932); India, Khandala, Western Ghauts, 26 Nov 1945, H. Santapau 8074 (holotype: BLAT).
Hier müsste für die Publikation folgende Reihenfolge eingehalten werden:
Holo- bzw. Lektotypus (gefolgt von ihren Iso- bzw. Isolecto-Typen) zuerst. In diesem Fall haben die Isotypen allerdings andere Nummern als der Holotypus, aber die als Isotypus designierten gehören trotzdem nach dem Holotypus eingeordnet.
Syntypen und ggf. Isosyntypen oder andere Typusbezeichnungen dann danach, bei gleichen Sammler/Sammelnummerstatements immer die Iso- irgendwastypen nachgestellt.
Auch auf dem Website kommt das genau umgekehrt heraus:
Es scheint, dass die Anordnung alphabetisch Sammlername (Nachname?) und Sammelnummer vorliegt.
Herzlichen Gruß
Walter
Updated by Katja Luther over 1 year ago
- Status changed from Resolved to Closed
- Assignee changed from Katja Luther to Andreas Müller
Katja Luther wrote in #note-10:
Test cdmLight implementation
In HOmotypicGroup.csv the example above shows now:
India, Khandala, Western Ghauts, 26 Nov 1945, H. Santapau 8074 (holotype: BLAT); India, Khandala, Western Ghauts, 26 Nov 1945, H. Santapau 8071 (isotype: K K000848074); India, Khandala, Western Ghauts, 26 Nov 1945, H. Santapau 8072 (isotype: A A00036932); India, E. Blatter 27553 (paratype: BLAT); India, E. Blatter 27554 (paratype: BLAT); India, E. Blatter 27555 (paratype: BLAT); India, H. Santapau 5945 (paratype: BLAT); India, H. Santapau 5946 (paratype: BLAT); India, H. Santapau 5947 (paratype: BLAT); India, H. Santapau 8649 (paratype: BLAT).
This seems to be correct.