EDIT Project Management: Issueshttps://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/https://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/redmine/favicon.ico?14691914852021-09-22T10:25:18ZEDIT Project Management
Redmine EDIT - feature request #9780 (Closed): Split rank grex into grex (ICNCP) and grex (infraspec)https://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/97802021-09-22T10:25:18ZAndreas Müller
<p>AM:</p>
<p>wir haben in letzter Zeit versucht das Handling (Parsen, Formattieren, Handling im TaxEditor) von Kultivaren etwas zu verbessern.</p>
<p>Dabei bin ich auf folgendes gestoßen: der Rang „grex“ wird im ICNCP als spezieller „Rang“ für Orchideen genannt. Bislang habe ich überall gehört, dass er nur dort vorkommen soll.<br>
Jetzt habe ich aber bei Hieracium sowohl in E+M als auch in Cichorieeae einige Namen gefunden, die den Rang auch dort zu verwenden scheinen und zudem eher nach den Regeln des ICN gebildet werden, auch wenn grex natürlich kein offizieller ICN Rang ist.<br>
Klären müsste ich, ob es sich dabei quasi um 2 verschiedene Ränge handelt. Das ist wichtig, da die Formatierung vom Rang abhängt. Wenn ich der Regel folge, dass „grex“ immer ein ICNCP Rang ist, würde das dazu führen, dass die Namen unten anders formatiert würden.<br>
Wisst ihr was es mit diesen Namen auf sich hat?</p>
<p>Hieracium aphyllum grex singulare Zahn in Koch, Syn. Deut. Schweiz. Fl. ed. 3: 1809. 1901 <br>
Hieracium bernense grex filicaule Zahn in Koch, Syn. Deut. Schweiz. Fl., ed. 3: 1833. 1901 <br>
...</p>
<p>NoK:</p>
<p>ja, grex im Sinne des ICNCP wurde eingeführt um Orchideenhybriden zu beschreiben und ist nach Art. 4 auf Orchideen beschränkt. </p>
<p>"ARTICLE 4: THE GREX (<a href="https://www.ishs.org/sites/default/files/static/ScriptaHorticulturae_18.pdf">https://www.ishs.org/sites/default/files/static/ScriptaHorticulturae_18.pdf</a>)<br>
4.1. The formal category for assembling plants based solely on specified parentage <br>
is the grex. It may only be used in orchid nomenclature. The rules for forming grex <br>
names are laid out in Art. 23 of this Code. ...</p>
<p>... in der Hieraciologie wurde der Terminus grex von der sog. deutschen Schule (Zahn und Vorläufer) eingeführt, die die "Kleinarten" als infraspezifische Taxa klassifiziert. Hier wurden grex und subgrex als Ränge zwischen Art und Unterart eingeführt (Ref., e.g. <a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25133846.pdf">https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25133846.pdf</a>). Da auch Rangstufen, die nicht explizit im ICN genannt sind, Gültigkeit haben, sind diese Ränge als gültig anzusehen, aber haben tatsächlich eine vom Rang i.S.d. ICNCP abweichende Bedeutung.</p>
<p>AM:<br>
D.h. ich mache dann da wirklich 2 semantisch unterschiedliche Ränge draus.</p>
<p>Noch [eine Frage] zum Thema: </p>
<p>Was meinst du, welches die geeignetsten Label wären, um die beiden sofort voneinander unterscheiden zu können?</p>
<ul>
<li>Grex im Sinne von „Zahn“: grex (Zahn), grex (Hieracium), grex (German school), … ?</li>
<li>Grex im Sinne des ICNCP: grex (ICNCP), grex (orchids), … ?</li>
</ul>
<p>NoK:</p>
<p>ich denke "grex (ICNCP)" ist am klarsten; im andern Fall ist es so, dass grex auch in anderen Gattungen verwendet wird/wurde: jedenfalls in Rubus (e.g. <a href="https://www.zobodat.at/pdf/MittNatVerSt_52_0253-0291.pdf">https://www.zobodat.at/pdf/MittNatVerSt_52_0253-0291.pdf</a>), deshalb denke ich, dass vielleicht "grex (infraspec)" ein guter Homonymiezusatz wäre.</p>
EDIT - bug #9762 (Closed): Handle cultivars correctly in TaxEditorhttps://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/97622021-09-15T13:45:48ZAndreas Müller
<p>copied from <a class="issue tracker-5 status-2 priority-12 priority-high14" title="feature request: Open issues for cultivar handling (In Progress)" href="https://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/9755">#9755</a></p>
<ul>
<li>If ICNCP is selected make only cultivar ranks (<a class="issue tracker-5 status-5 priority-10 priority-lowest closed" title="feature request: [Rule] Rank rule for CultivarPlantNames (Closed)" href="https://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/6387">#6387</a>) available</li>
<li>If a cultivar rank is selected always show the according fields, no matter if ICNAFP or ICNCP is selected
<ul>
<li>if "Cultivar" is selected show "Cultivar Group" and "Cultivar Name" (new field that should appear above "Cultivar Name")</li>
<li>if "Cultivar Group" is selected show "Cultivar Group"</li>
<li>if "Grex (ICNCP)" is selected show "Cultivar Group" (see also <a class="issue tracker-5 status-5 priority-10 priority-lowest closed" title="feature request: Split rank grex into grex (ICNCP) and grex (infraspec) (Closed)" href="https://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/9780">#9780</a>)</li>
</ul></li>
<li>Rename Cultivar Name to Cultivar Epithet and Cultivar Group to Cultivar Group Epi. (to make it not too long)</li>
<li>for checking if a rank is a cultivar rank use Rank.isCultivar()</li>
</ul>
<p>Discussion is still need for the following tasks:</p>
<ul>
<li>If ICNafp is selected do not show cultivar ranks</li>
<li>Make it possible via preferences to select in nomenclatural code field only from certain Codes (e.g. only ICN and ICNCP), alternatively remove ICNCP from Codes as selecting one of the cultivar ranks (<a class="issue tracker-5 status-5 priority-10 priority-lowest closed" title="feature request: [Rule] Rank rule for CultivarPlantNames (Closed)" href="https://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/6387">#6387</a>) may be enough to decide that ICNCP is meant (ask taxonomists for correctness of this idea)</li>
<li>How to handle graft-chimaera and denomination class rank</li>
</ul>
EDIT - feature request #9761 (Closed): Add cultivarGroup as field for handling cultivar groups an...https://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/97612021-09-15T11:55:22ZAndreas Müller
<p>This is needed as in cultivar names the cultivar epithet can exist together with cultivar group epithet and/or grex epithet.</p>
<p>Grex and cultivarGroup can be handled in the same field.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.actahort.org/chronica/pdf/sh_10.pdf">http://www.actahort.org/chronica/pdf/sh_10.pdf</a></p>
<p><a href="https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internationaler_Code_der_Nomenklatur_der_Kulturpflanzen">https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internationaler_Code_der_Nomenklatur_der_Kulturpflanzen</a></p>
EDIT - feature request #9757 (Closed): Make cultivars, cultivar groups and grexes parsablehttps://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/97572021-09-14T07:47:38ZAndreas Müller
<p>See <a href="http://www.actahort.org/chronica/pdf/sh_10.pdf">http://www.actahort.org/chronica/pdf/sh_10.pdf</a></p>
<p>Allowed characters: Art. 21.18</p>
EDIT - feature request #9755 (In Progress): Open issues for cultivar handlinghttps://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/97552021-09-11T13:08:56ZAndreas Müller
<p><del>Cultivar names, groups and grex are currently not parsable</del> (<a class="issue tracker-5 status-5 priority-10 priority-lowest closed" title="feature request: Make cultivars, cultivar groups and grexes parsable (Closed)" href="https://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/9757">#9757</a>)</p>
<p><del>Cultivar names, groups and grex need to be formatted correctly</del> (<a class="issue tracker-5 status-5 priority-10 priority-lowest closed" title="feature request: Adapt cache strategy to support cultivar names (Closed)" href="https://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/9754">#9754</a>)</p>
<p>Decide on related ranks (see also <a class="issue tracker-5 status-5 priority-10 priority-lowest closed" title="feature request: [Rule] Rank rule for CultivarPlantNames (Closed)" href="https://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/6387">#6387</a>)</p>
<p><del>Add "Group" or "Gp" and "grex" or "gx" as abbreviation to the according rank terms</del> (similar to <a class="issue tracker-5 status-5 priority-11 priority-default closed" title="feature request: Add abbreviation to Rank "Cultivar" (Closed)" href="https://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/5981">#5981</a> - but not fully correct there)</p>
<p>Handling of cultivars in TaxEditor needs improvement (see <a class="issue tracker-4 status-5 priority-10 priority-lowest closed" title="bug: Handle cultivars correctly in TaxEditor (Closed)" href="https://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/9762">#9762</a>)</p>
<ul>
<li><del>Show cultivar ranks only when ICNCP is selected, do not show any other ranks then</del> <a class="issue tracker-4 status-5 priority-10 priority-lowest closed" title="bug: Handle cultivars correctly in TaxEditor (Closed)" href="https://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/9762">#9762</a></li>
<li>Make it possible to select only from certain Codes in NomCode field (e.g. only ICN and ICNCP), alternatively remove ICNCP from Codes as selecting one of the cultivar ranks (<a class="issue tracker-5 status-5 priority-10 priority-lowest closed" title="feature request: [Rule] Rank rule for CultivarPlantNames (Closed)" href="https://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/6387">#6387</a>) may be enough to decide that ICNCP is meant (ask taxonomists for correctness of this idea)</li>
</ul>
<p>Handle cultivars correctly in publication</p>
<ul>
<li>cultivar part should not be put in italics (see also formatting)</li>
</ul>
<p>Questions:</p>
<ul>
<li><del>is grex only used for cultivars? What about existing grex names in current databases</del></li>
<li>what exactly is rank "denomination class" (see Art. 6), usually it is a genus, should it be moved there?</li>
<li>Should graft-chimera be handled similar to hybrids (or general: how to handle them)</li>
<li><del>what is rank convar</del> (see <a class="issue tracker-5 status-5 priority-10 priority-lowest closed" title="feature request: [Rule] Rank rule for CultivarPlantNames (Closed)" href="https://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/6387">#6387</a>)</li>
<li>Should a cultivar name link to the scientific name it is derived from? (see IOPI model <a href="https://archive.bgbm.org/biodivinf/docs/iopi_model/iopi_model.pdf">https://archive.bgbm.org/biodivinf/docs/iopi_model/iopi_model.pdf</a> page 295)</li>
<li>How to handle cultivars using infraspecific scientific name part (the rank can not be defined here as the rank is used for setting the cultivar rank), should rank marker be entered into the infaspecific epi field as this is a rare case, maybe change label in TaxEditor in this case?</li>
</ul>
<p><del>What about grex names like "Amblysellus grex" (<a href="https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/4880">https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/4880</a>)? Is this a simple species or a cultivated plant name? Similar: Parthenicus grex Van Duzee, 1925</del></p>
<p>Code: <a href="http://www.actahort.org/chronica/pdf/sh_10.pdf">http://www.actahort.org/chronica/pdf/sh_10.pdf</a></p>
<p><a href="https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internationaler_Code_der_Nomenklatur_der_Kulturpflanzen">https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internationaler_Code_der_Nomenklatur_der_Kulturpflanzen</a></p>
<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grex_(horticulture)">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grex_(horticulture)</a></p>
EDIT - feature request #9754 (Closed): Adapt cache strategy to support cultivar nameshttps://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/97542021-09-11T06:55:05ZAndreas Müller
<p>copied form <a class="issue tracker-5 status-2 priority-10 priority-lowest" title="feature request: Implement cache strategy for cultivar plant names (done), bacterial names, fungi, etc. (In Progress)" href="https://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/6963">#6963</a></p>
<p>We need a cache strategy for Cultivar Status (Art. 14), Group Status (Art. 15) and Grex Status (Art. 16).</p>
<p>Code: <a href="http://www.actahort.org/chronica/pdf/sh_10.pdf">http://www.actahort.org/chronica/pdf/sh_10.pdf</a></p>
<p><a href="https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internationaler_Code_der_Nomenklatur_der_Kulturpflanzen">https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internationaler_Code_der_Nomenklatur_der_Kulturpflanzen</a></p>
<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graft-chimaera">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graft-chimaera</a></p>
EDIT - feature request #6963 (In Progress): Implement cache strategy for cultivar plant names (do...https://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/69632017-09-20T16:36:26ZAndreas Müller
<p>We do now allow editing all nomenclatural codes and subtypes (e.g. fungi).</p>
<p>Therefore we need to implement appropriate cache strategies for all these codes.</p>
<p>Cultivar names are handled in <a class="issue tracker-5 status-5 priority-10 priority-lowest closed" title="feature request: Adapt cache strategy to support cultivar names (Closed)" href="https://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/9754">#9754</a></p>
EDIT - feature request #6387 (Closed): [Rule] Rank rule for CultivarPlantNameshttps://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/63872017-01-26T15:21:58ZAndreas Müller
<p>The only possible ranks for cultivars are CULTIVAR, GREX, CULTIVAR_GROUP, GRAFT_CHIMAERA or DENOMINATION_CLASS.</p>
<p>See comment on ICultivarPlantName</p>
<p><a href="http://www.actahort.org/chronica/pdf/sh_10.pdf" class="external">www.actahort.org/chronica/pdf/sh_10.pdf</a></p>
<p><a href="https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internationaler_Code_der_Nomenklatur_der_Kulturpflanzen">https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internationaler_Code_der_Nomenklatur_der_Kulturpflanzen</a></p>
<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grex_(horticulture)">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grex_(horticulture)</a></p>
<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graft-chimaera">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graft-chimaera</a></p>
<p>Note: CONVAR was prior in this list too, but turned out to be not a cultivar rank.</p>
<p>We still need to discuss if graft-chimaera and demonitation classes are really ranks or only flags.</p>
EDIT - feature request #5981 (Closed): Add abbreviation to Rank "Cultivar"https://dev.e-taxonomy.eu/redmine/issues/59812016-07-15T11:32:13ZAndreas Müller
<p>For formatting it is helpful to have the abbreviation. Maybe not always necessary if name is handled as CultivarName, not BotanicalName.</p>
<p>Abbreviation will be "cv."</p>
<p>Also add as idInVocabulary</p>